Literature DB >> 10993414

Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites.

A M Swartz1, S J Strath, D R Bassett, W L O'Brien, G A King, B E Ainsworth.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to establish prediction models that relate hip and wrist accelerometer data to energy expenditure (EE) in field and laboratory settings. We also sought to determine whether the addition of a wrist accelerometer would significantly improve the prediction of EE (METs), compared with a model that used a hip accelerometer alone.
METHODS: Seventy participants completed one to six activities within the categories of yardwork, housework, family care, occupation, recreation, and conditioning, for a total of 5 to 12 participants tested per activity. EE was measured using the Cosmed K4b2 portable metabolic system. Simultaneously, two Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) accelerometers (model 7164), one worn on the wrist and one worn on the hip, recorded body movement. Correlations between EE measured by the Cosmed and the counts recorded by the CSA accelerometers were calculated, and regression equations were developed to predict EE from the CSA data.
RESULTS: The wrist, hip, and combined hip and wrist regression equations accounted for 3.3%, 31.7%, and 34.3% of the variation in EE, respectively. The addition of the wrist accelerometer data to the hip accelerometer data to form a bivariate regression equation, although statistically significant (P = 0.002), resulted in only a minor improvement in prediction of EE. Cut points for 3 METs (574 hip counts), 6 METs (4945 hip counts), and 9 METs (9317 hip counts) were also established.
CONCLUSION: The small amount of additional accuracy gained from the wrist accelerometer is offset by the extra time required to analyze the data and the cost of the accelerometer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10993414     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  153 in total

1.  Identifying walking trips from GPS and accelerometer data in adolescent females.

Authors:  Daniel A Rodriguez; Gi-Hyoug Cho; John P Elder; Terry L Conway; Kelly R Evenson; Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar; Elizabeth Shay; Deborah Cohen; Sara Veblen-Mortenson; Julie Pickrell; Leslie Lytle
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2011-05-11

2.  Towards an Understanding of Change in Physical Activity from Pregnancy Through Postpartum.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson
Journal:  Psychol Sport Exerc       Date:  2011-01

3.  Validity of uniaxial accelerometry during activities of daily living in children.

Authors:  Joey C Eisenmann; Scott J Strath; Danny Shadrick; Paul Rigsby; Nicole Hirsch; Leigh Jacobson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-10-21       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Predicting energy expenditure of physical activity using hip- and wrist-worn accelerometers.

Authors:  Kong Y Chen; Sari A Acra; Karen Majchrzak; Candice L Donahue; Lemont Baker; Linda Clemens; Ming Sun; Maciej S Buchowski
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Perceived effort of walking: relationship with gait, physical function and activity, fear of falling, and confidence in walking in older adults with mobility limitations.

Authors:  Leslie M Julius; Jennifer S Brach; David M Wert; Jessie M VanSwearingen
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2012-06-21

6.  A randomized trial of diet and physical activity in women treated for stage II-IV ovarian cancer: Rationale and design of the Lifestyle Intervention for Ovarian Cancer Enhanced Survival (LIVES): An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG-225) Study.

Authors:  Cynthia A Thomson; Tracy E Crane; Austin Miller; David O Garcia; Karen Basen-Engquist; David S Alberts
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Feasibility, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a telephone-based weight loss program delivered via a hospital outpatient setting.

Authors:  M E Whelan; A D Goode; E G Eakin; J L Veerman; E A H Winkler; I J Hickman; M M Reeves
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Comparison of Accelerometry Methods for Estimating Physical Activity.

Authors:  Jacqueline Kerr; Catherine R Marinac; Katherine Ellis; Suneeta Godbole; Aaron Hipp; Karen Glanz; Jonathan Mitchell; Francine Laden; Peter James; David Berrigan
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Classification accuracy of the wrist-worn gravity estimator of normal everyday activity accelerometer.

Authors:  Whitney A Welch; David R Bassett; Dixie L Thompson; Patty S Freedson; John W Staudenmayer; Dinesh John; Jeremy A Steeves; Scott A Conger; Tyrone Ceaser; Cheryl A Howe; Jeffer E Sasaki; Eugene C Fitzhugh
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Ecological measurement of fatigue and fatigability in older adults with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Susan L Murphy; Dylan M Smith
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 6.053

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.