Literature DB >> 16333623

64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents.

David Maintz1, Harald Seifarth, Rainer Raupach, Thomas Flohr, Michael Rink, Torsten Sommer, Murat Ozgün, Walter Heindel, Roman Fischbach.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test a large sample of different coronary artery stents using four image reconstruction approaches with respect to lumen visualization, lumen attenuation, and image noise in 64-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in vitro and to provide a catalogue of currently used coronary artery stents when imaged with state-of the-art MDCT. We examined 68 different coronary artery stents (57 stainless steel, four cobalt-chromium, one cobalt-alloy, two nitinol, four tantalum) in a coronary artery phantom (vessel diameter 3 mm, intravascular attenuation 250 HU, extravascular density -70). Stents were imaged in axial orientation with standard parameters: 32 x 0.6 collimation, pitch 0.24, 680 mAs, 120 kV, rotation time 0.37 s. Four different image reconstructions were obtained with varying convolution kernels and section thicknesses: (1) soft, 0.6 mm, (2) soft, 0.75, (3) medium soft, 0.6, and (4) stent-optimized sharp, 0.6. To evaluate visualization characteristics of of the stent, the lumen diameter, intraluminal density and noise were measured. The high-resolution kernel offered significantly better average lumen visualization (57% +/-10%) and more realistic lumen attenuation (222 HU +/-66 HU) at the expense of increased noise (15.3 HU +/-3.7 HU) compared with the soft and medium-soft CT angiography (CTA) protocol (p<0.001 for all). Stents with a lumen visibility of more than 66% were: Arthos pico, Driver, Flex, Nexus2, S7, Tenax complete, Vision (all 67%), Symbiot, Teneo (70%), and Radius (73%). Only ten stents showed a lumen visibility of less than 50%. Stent lumen visibility largely varies depending on the stent type. Even with the improved spatial resolution of 64-slice CT, a stent-optimized kernel remains beneficial for stent visualization when compared with the standard medium-soft CTA protocol. Using 64-slice CT and high-resolution kernel, the majority of stent products show a lumen visibility of more than 50% of the stent diameter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16333623     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-0062-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  22 in total

1.  [Submillimeter 3D coronary MR angiography with real-time navigator correction in 107 patients with suspected coronary artery disease].

Authors:  T Sommer; U Hofer; M Hackenbroch; C Meyer; S Flacke; A Schmiedel; C Schmitz; K Thiemann; H Omran; H Schild
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2002-04

2.  Coronary arterial stents: safety and artifacts during MR imaging.

Authors:  J Hug; E Nagel; A Bornstedt; B Schnackenburg; H Oswald; E Fleck
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.

Authors:  P J Scanlon; D P Faxon; A M Audet; B Carabello; G J Dehmer; K A Eagle; R D Legako; D F Leon; J A Murray; S E Nissen; C J Pepine; R M Watson; J L Ritchie; R J Gibbons; M D Cheitlin; T J Gardner; A Garson; R O Russell; T J Ryan; S C Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot.

Authors:  T Flohr; K Stierstorfer; R Raupach; S Ulzheimer; H Bruder
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2004-12

5.  Noninvasive assessment of left main coronary stent patency with 16-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Martine Gilard; Jean Christophe Cornily; Gilles Rioufol; Gerard Finet; Pierre Yves Pennec; Jacques Mansourati; Jean Jacques Blanc; Jacques Boschat
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Assessment of coronary artery stents using 16-slice MDCT angiography: evaluation of a dedicated reconstruction kernel and a noise reduction filter.

Authors:  Harald Seifarth; Rainer Raupach; Stefan Schaller; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Thomas Flohr; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach; David Maintz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses.

Authors:  W Y Kim; P G Danias; M Stuber; S D Flamm; S Plein; E Nagel; S E Langerak; O M Weber; E M Pedersen; M Schmidt; R M Botnar; W J Manning
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-12-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Artifact-free in-stent lumen visualization by standard magnetic resonance angiography using a new metallic magnetic resonance imaging stent.

Authors:  Arno Buecker; Elmar Spuentrup; Alexander Ruebben; Rolf W Günther
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Joanne D Schuijf; Jeroen J Bax; J Wouter Jukema; Hildo J Lamb; Hazem M A Warda; Hubert W Vliegen; Albert de Roos; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Assessment of coronary arterial stents by multislice-CT angiography.

Authors:  D Maintz; M Grude; E M Fallenberg; W Heindel; R Fischbach
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.701

View more
  47 in total

1.  [Imaging of coronary stents using multislice computed tomography].

Authors:  H Seifarth; W Heindel; D Maintz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis with prospectively ECG-triggered axial CT angiography versus retrospective technique: a phantom study.

Authors:  W-J Yang; Z-L Pan; H Zhang; L-F Pang; Y Guo; K-M Chen
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  64-Slice multidetector row CT angiography of the abdomen: comparison of low versus high concentration iodinated contrast media in a porcine model.

Authors:  N-S Holalkere; K Matthes; S P Kalva; W R Brugge; D V Sahani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Impact of an advanced image-based monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm on coronary stent visualization using third generation dual-source dual-energy CT: a phantom study.

Authors:  Stefanie Mangold; Paola M Cannaó; U Joseph Schoepf; Julian L Wichmann; Christian Canstein; Stephen R Fuller; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Akos Varga-Szemes; Konstantin Nikolaou; Carlo N De Cecco
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Effect of contrast concentration, tube potential and reconstruction kernels on MDCT evaluation of coronary stents: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Gopi Kiran Reddy Sirineni; Mannudeep K Kalra; Krishna Pottala; Sandra Waldrop; Mushabbar Syed; Stefan Tigges
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Evaluation of in-stent restenosis in proximal coronary arteries with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).

Authors:  V Chabbert; D Carrie; M Bennaceur; E Maupas; V Lauwers; M Mhem; T Lhermusier; M Elbaz; F Joffre; H Rousseau; J Puel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Cardiac CT: coronary arteries and beyond.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Georg Mühlenbruch; Rolf W Günther; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Comprehensive cardiac CT study: evaluation of coronary arteries, left ventricular function, and myocardial perfusion--is it possible?

Authors:  Ricardo C Cury; Koen Nieman; Michael D Shapiro; Khurram Nasir; Roberto C Cury; Thomas J Brady
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Coronary artery stent geometry and in-stent contrast attenuation with 64-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Tiziano Schepis; Pascal Koepfli; Sebastian Leschka; Lotus Desbiolles; Lars Husmann; Oliver Gaemperli; Franz R Eberli; Simon Wildermuth; Borut Marincek; Thomas F Lüscher; Hatem Alkadhi; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michèle Hamon; Laure Champ-Rigot; Rémy Morello; John W Riddell; Martial Hamon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.