OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of dual source CT coronary angiography (DSCT-CA) in the detection of in-stent restenosis (>or=50% luminal narrowing) in symptomatic patients referred for conventional angiography (CA). DESIGN/ PATIENTS: 100 patients (78 males, age 62 (SD 10)) with chest pain were prospectively evaluated after coronary stenting. DSCT-CA was performed before CA. SETTING: Many patients undergo coronary artery stenting; availability of a non-invasive modality to detect in-stent restenosis would be desirable. RESULTS: Average heart rate (HR) was 67 (SD 12) (range 46-106) bpm. There were 178 stented lesions. The interval between stenting and inclusion in the study was 35 (SD 41) (range 3-140) months. 39/100 (39%) patients had angiographically proven restenosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of DSCT-CA, calculated in all stents, were 94%, 92%, 77% and 98%, respectively. Diagnostic performance at HR <70 bpm (n = 69; mean 58 bpm) was similar to that at HR >or=70 bpm (n = 31; mean 78 bpm); diagnostic performance in single stents (n = 95) was similar to that in overlapping stents and bifurcations (n = 83). In stents >or=3.5 mm (n = 78), sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV were 100%; in 3 mm stents (n = 59), sensitivity and NPV were 100%, specificity 97%, PPV 91%; in stents <or=2.75 mm (n = 41), sensitivity was 84%, specificity 64%, PPV 52%, NPV 90%. Nine stents <or=2.75 mm were uninterpretable. Specificity of DSCT-CA in stents >or=3.5 mm was significantly higher than in stents <or=2.75 mm (OR = 6.14; 99%CI: 1.52 to 9.79). CONCLUSION: DSCT-CA performs well in the detection of in-stent restenosis. Although DSCT-CA leads to frequent false positive findings in smaller stents (<or=2.75 mm), it reliably rules out in-stent restenosis irrespective of stent size.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of dual source CT coronary angiography (DSCT-CA) in the detection of in-stent restenosis (>or=50% luminal narrowing) in symptomatic patients referred for conventional angiography (CA). DESIGN/ PATIENTS: 100 patients (78 males, age 62 (SD 10)) with chest pain were prospectively evaluated after coronary stenting. DSCT-CA was performed before CA. SETTING: Many patients undergo coronary artery stenting; availability of a non-invasive modality to detect in-stent restenosis would be desirable. RESULTS: Average heart rate (HR) was 67 (SD 12) (range 46-106) bpm. There were 178 stented lesions. The interval between stenting and inclusion in the study was 35 (SD 41) (range 3-140) months. 39/100 (39%) patients had angiographically proven restenosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of DSCT-CA, calculated in all stents, were 94%, 92%, 77% and 98%, respectively. Diagnostic performance at HR <70 bpm (n = 69; mean 58 bpm) was similar to that at HR >or=70 bpm (n = 31; mean 78 bpm); diagnostic performance in single stents (n = 95) was similar to that in overlapping stents and bifurcations (n = 83). In stents >or=3.5 mm (n = 78), sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV were 100%; in 3 mm stents (n = 59), sensitivity and NPV were 100%, specificity 97%, PPV 91%; in stents <or=2.75 mm (n = 41), sensitivity was 84%, specificity 64%, PPV 52%, NPV 90%. Nine stents <or=2.75 mm were uninterpretable. Specificity of DSCT-CA in stents >or=3.5 mm was significantly higher than in stents <or=2.75 mm (OR = 6.14; 99%CI: 1.52 to 9.79). CONCLUSION: DSCT-CA performs well in the detection of in-stent restenosis. Although DSCT-CA leads to frequent false positive findings in smaller stents (<or=2.75 mm), it reliably rules out in-stent restenosis irrespective of stent size.
Authors: Stefanie Mangold; Paola M Cannaó; U Joseph Schoepf; Julian L Wichmann; Christian Canstein; Stephen R Fuller; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Akos Varga-Szemes; Konstantin Nikolaou; Carlo N De Cecco Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 5.315