OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (64-CT) for detection of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in an unselected, consecutive patient population. BACKGROUND: Detection of in-stent restenosis by cardiac CT would be a major advance for the evaluation of patients suspected of having ISR. However, the diagnostic accuracy of current generation 64-CT in this context is not fully established. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study on patients with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome with no prior history of coronary artery disease. Six months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent placement they underwent a 64-CT scan (Toshiba Multi-Slice Aquilion 64) and consequently a repeat coronary angiography for comparison. Cardiac CT data sets were analyzed for the presence of in-stent restenosis by two independent expert readers blinded to the coronary angiographic data. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients with a total of 140 stents were evaluated. Males comprised 82% of the study group and the mean age was 63±10 years. The mean time from PCI to the repeat coronary angiography was 208±37 days and the mean time from 64-CT to repeat coronary angiography was 3.7±4.9 days. The restenosis rate according to coronary angiography was 26%. Stent diameter, strut thickness, heart rate and body mass index (BMI) significantly affected image quality. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 64-CT for detection of in-stent restenosis were 27%, 95%, 67% and 78%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Current generation, 64-slice CT, remains limited in its ability to accurately detect in-stent restenosis.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (64-CT) for detection of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in an unselected, consecutive patient population. BACKGROUND: Detection of in-stent restenosis by cardiac CT would be a major advance for the evaluation of patients suspected of having ISR. However, the diagnostic accuracy of current generation 64-CT in this context is not fully established. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study on patients with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome with no prior history of coronary artery disease. Six months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent placement they underwent a 64-CT scan (Toshiba Multi-Slice Aquilion 64) and consequently a repeat coronary angiography for comparison. Cardiac CT data sets were analyzed for the presence of in-stent restenosis by two independent expert readers blinded to the coronary angiographic data. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients with a total of 140 stents were evaluated. Males comprised 82% of the study group and the mean age was 63±10 years. The mean time from PCI to the repeat coronary angiography was 208±37 days and the mean time from 64-CT to repeat coronary angiography was 3.7±4.9 days. The restenosis rate according to coronary angiography was 26%. Stent diameter, strut thickness, heart rate and body mass index (BMI) significantly affected image quality. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 64-CT for detection of in-stent restenosis were 27%, 95%, 67% and 78%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Current generation, 64-slice CT, remains limited in its ability to accurately detect in-stent restenosis.
Authors: M-N Psychogios; P Schramm; J-H Buhk; A Xyda; K Gröschel; K Jung; M Knauth Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Florian Wolf; Sebastian Leschka; Christian Loewe; Peter Homolka; Christina Plank; Ruediger Schernthaner; Dominik Bercaczy; Robert Goetti; Johannes Lammer; Guy Friedrich; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi; Gudrun Feuchtner Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-04-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Quynh A Truong; Paul Knaapen; Gianluca Pontone; Daniele Andreini; Jonathon Leipsic; Patricia Carrascosa; Bin Lu; Kelley Branch; Subha Raman; Stephen Bloom; James K Min Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2014-12-31 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Daniel Mudrick; Lisa A Kaltenbach; Bimal Shah; Barbara Lytle; Frederick A Masoudi; Daniel B Mark; Jerome J Federspiel; Patricia A Cowper; Cynthia Green; Pamela S Douglas Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2012-05-30 Impact factor: 2.778