BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography (coronary CTA) using prospective ECG triggering (PT) for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). METHODS: A total of 20 patients underwent coronary CTA with PT using a 128-slice CT scanner (Definition AS+, Siemens) and ICA. All coronary CTA studies were evaluated for significant coronary artery stenoses (>or=50% luminal narrowing) by 2 observers in consensus using the AHA-15-segment model. Findings in CTA were compared to those in ICA. RESULTS: Coronary CTA using PT had 88% sensitivity in comparison to 100% with ICA, 95% to 88% specificity, 80% to 92% positive predictive value and 97% to 100% negative predictive value for diagnosing significant coronary artery stenosis on per segment per patient analysis, respectively. Mean effective radiation dose-equivalent of CTA was 2.6+/-1 mSv. CONCLUSION: Coronary CTA using PT enables non-invasive diagnosis of significant coronary artery stenosis with high diagnostic accuracy in comparison to ICA and is associated with comparably low radiation exposure.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography (coronary CTA) using prospective ECG triggering (PT) for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). METHODS: A total of 20 patients underwent coronary CTA with PT using a 128-slice CT scanner (Definition AS+, Siemens) and ICA. All coronary CTA studies were evaluated for significant coronary artery stenoses (>or=50% luminal narrowing) by 2 observers in consensus using the AHA-15-segment model. Findings in CTA were compared to those in ICA. RESULTS: Coronary CTA using PT had 88% sensitivity in comparison to 100% with ICA, 95% to 88% specificity, 80% to 92% positive predictive value and 97% to 100% negative predictive value for diagnosing significant coronary artery stenosis on per segment per patient analysis, respectively. Mean effective radiation dose-equivalent of CTA was 2.6+/-1 mSv. CONCLUSION: Coronary CTA using PT enables non-invasive diagnosis of significant coronary artery stenosis with high diagnostic accuracy in comparison to ICA and is associated with comparably low radiation exposure.
Authors: Stephen Schroeder; Stephan Achenbach; Frank Bengel; Christof Burgstahler; Filippo Cademartiri; Pim de Feyter; Richard George; Philipp Kaufmann; Andreas F Kopp; Juhani Knuuti; Dieter Ropers; Joanne Schuijf; Laurens F Tops; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Arthur E Stillman; Matthijs Oudkerk; Margaret Ackerman; Christoph R Becker; Pawel E Buszman; Pim J de Feyter; Udo Hoffmann; Matthew T Keadey; Riccardo Marano; Martin J Lipton; Gilbert L Raff; Gautham P Reddy; Michael R Rees; Geoffrey D Rubin; U Joseph Schoepf; Giuseppe Tarulli; Edwin J R van Beek; Lewis Wexler; Charles S White Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-06-05 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: James P Earls; Elise L Berman; Bruce A Urban; Charlene A Curry; Judith L Lane; Robert S Jennings; Colin C McCulloch; Jiang Hsieh; John H Londt Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-01-14 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Koen Nieman; Filippo Cademartiri; Pedro A Lemos; Rolf Raaijmakers; Peter M T Pattynama; Pim J de Feyter Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Dieter Ropers; Johannes Rixe; Katharina Anders; Axel Küttner; Ulrich Baum; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2005-12-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Thorsten R C Johnson; Konstantin Nikolaou; Stephanie Busch; Alexander W Leber; Alexander Becker; Bernd J Wintersperger; Carsten Rist; Andreas Knez; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Dieter Ropers; Ulrich Baum; Karsten Pohle; Katharina Anders; Stefan Ulzheimer; Bernd Ohnesorge; Christian Schlundt; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-02-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: N Glaser-Gallion; B Stinn; H Alkadhi; M Lell; H W Goo; J-F Paul; S Wildermuth; S Leschka Journal: Radiologe Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 0.635