Literature DB >> 12111262

Early postoperative results of surgery for rectal carcinoma as a function of the distance of the tumor from the anal verge: results of a multicenter prospective evaluation.

Frank Marusch1, Andreas Koch, Uwe Schmidt, Hubertus Wenisch, Michael Ernst, Thomas Manger, Stefanie Wolff, Matthias Pross, Jörg Tautenhahn, Ingo Gastinger, Hans Lippert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The problems associated with rectal surgery are frequently discussed with no reference being made to the distance of the tumor from the anal verge. This study examined the effect of the location of the tumor on early postoperative results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter study involving 75 German hospitals and 3756 patients, of whom 1463 had rectal carcinoma. On the basis of the location of the tumor (distance from the anal verge), four groups were distinguished: <4, 4-7.9, 8-11.9, and 12-16 cm.
RESULTS: Resection and abdominoperineal resection rates and the incidence of postoperative complications depended on the location of the tumor. Significantly higher resection rates and fewer specific complications, and a significant reduction in overall postoperative morbidity were found with tumor locations more than 8 cm from the anal verge. The highest anastomotic leak rate was observed with anastomoses less than 7 cm from the anal verge. The logistic regression showed that the distance of the tumor from the anal verge is an independent variable for the development of an anastomotic leak.
CONCLUSIONS: Early results are greatly affected by the location of the rectal carcinoma. This applies to both abdominoperineal resection rates and specific postoperative complications, such as anastomotic leak rate and operation morbidity in general.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12111262     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-002-0298-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  6 in total

Review 1.  Influence of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  In Ja Park
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Current perioperative practice in rectal surgery in Austria and Germany.

Authors:  Till Hasenberg; Friedrich Längle; Bianca Reibenwein; Karin Schindler; Stefan Post; Claudia Spies; Wolfgang Schwenk; Edward Shang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Delayed anastomotic leakage following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ui Sup Shin; Chan Wook Kim; Chang Sik Yu; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Risk factors for symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer with 30 Gy/10 f/2 w preoperative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Jin Gu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  "Fast-track" rehabilitation after rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  W Schwenk; J Neudecker; W Raue; O Haase; J M Müller
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Risk factors of early postoperative small bowel obstruction following a proctectomy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin Yong Shin
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2011-12-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.