Literature DB >> 20383578

BRCA1/2 test results impact risk management attitudes, intentions, and uptake.

Suzanne C O'Neill1, Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir, Tiffani A Demarco, Beth N Peshkin, Kristi D Graves, Karen Brown, Karen E Hurley, Claudine Isaacs, Sharon Hecker, Marc D Schwartz.   

Abstract

Women who receive positive or uninformative BRCA1/2 test results face a number of decisions about how to manage their cancer risk. The purpose of this study was to prospectively examine the effect of receiving a positive versus uninformative BRCA1/2 genetic test result on the perceived pros and cons of risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and risk-reducing oophorectomy (RRO) and breast cancer screening. We further examined how perceived pros and cons of surgery predict intention for and uptake of surgery. 308 women (146 positive, 162 uninformative) were included in RRM and breast cancer screening analyses. 276 women were included in RRO analyses. Participants completed questionnaires at pre-disclosure baseline and 1-, 6-, and 12-months post-disclosure. We used linear multiple regression to assess whether test result contributed to change in pros and cons and logistic regression to predict intentions and surgery uptake. Receipt of a positive BRCA1/2 test result predicted stronger pros for RRM and RRO (P < 0.001), but not perceived cons of RRM and RRO. Pros of surgery predicted RRM and RRO intentions in carriers and RRO intentions in uninformatives. Cons predicted RRM intentions in carriers. Pros and cons predicted carriers' RRO uptake in the year after testing (P < 0.001). Receipt of BRCA1/2 mutation test results impacts how carriers see the positive aspects of RRO and RRM and their surgical intentions. Both the positive and negative aspects predict uptake of surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20383578      PMCID: PMC3039480          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0881-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  33 in total

1.  Using intervention theory to model factors influencing behavior change. Project RESPECT.

Authors:  M Fishbein; M Hennessy; M Kamb; G A Bolan; T Hoxworth; M Iatesta; F Rhodes; J M Zenilman
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Utilization of breast cancer screening in a clinically based sample of women after BRCA1/2 testing.

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Marc D Schwartz; Claudine Isaacs; Chanita Hughes; David Main; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Intention to undergo prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  B Meiser; P Butow; M Friedlander; V Schnieden; M Gattas; J Kirk; G Suthers; E Haan; K Tucker
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Breast cancer risks in individuals testing negative for a known family mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2.

Authors:  S M Domchek; M M Gaudet; J E Stopfer; M H Fleischaut; J Powers; N Kauff; K Offit; K L Nathanson; M Robson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Genetic testing for a BRCA1 mutation: prophylactic surgery and screening behavior in women 2 years post testing.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Ken R Smith; Robert T Croyle; Bonnie J Baty; Jean E Wylie; Debra Dutson; Anna Chan; Heidi A Hamann; Caryn Lerman; Jamie McDonald; Vickie Venne; John H Ward; Elaine Lyon
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita Hughes; David Main; Claudine Isaacs; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Efficacy of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a personal and family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  S K McDonnell; D J Schaid; J L Myers; C S Grant; J H Donohue; J E Woods; M H Frost; J L Johnson; D L Sitta; J M Slezak; T B Crotty; R B Jenkins; T A Sellers; L C Hartmann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  Noah D Kauff; Jaya M Satagopan; Mark E Robson; Lauren Scheuer; Martee Hensley; Clifford A Hudis; Nathan A Ellis; Jeff Boyd; Patrick I Borgen; Richard R Barakat; Larry Norton; Mercedes Castiel; Khedoudja Nafa; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Timothy R Rebbeck; Henry T Lynch; Susan L Neuhausen; Steven A Narod; Laura Van't Veer; Judy E Garber; Gareth Evans; Claudine Isaacs; Mary B Daly; Ellen Matloff; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Barbara L Weber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A BRCA1/2 mutation, high breast density and prominent pushing margins of a tumor independently contribute to a frequent false-negative mammography.

Authors:  Madeleine Tilanus-Linthorst; Leon Verhoog; Inge-Marie Obdeijn; Karina Bartels; Marian Menke-Pluymers; Alexander Eggermont; Jan Klijn; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Theo van der Kwast; Cecile Brekelmans
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  16 in total

1.  Challenges of genetic testing in adolescents with cardiac arrhythmia syndromes.

Authors:  Lilian Liou Cohen; Marina Stolerman; Christine Walsh; David Wasserman; Siobhan M Dolan
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Impact of genomic testing and patient-reported outcomes on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Chalanda N Evans; Noel T Brewer; Susan T Vadaparampil; Marc Boisvert; Yvonne Ottaviano; M Catherine Lee; Claudine Isaacs; Marc D Schwartz; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  An iPhone Application Intervention to Promote Surveillance Among Women with a BRCA Mutation: Pre-intervention Data.

Authors:  Stephanie A Cohen; Courtney Lynam Scherr; Dawn M Nixon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Predictors of risk-reducing surgery intentions following genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Mary Kathleen Ladd; Beth N Peshkin; Leigha Senter; Shari Baldinger; Claudine Isaacs; Hannah Segal; Samantha Philip; Chloe Phillips; Kate Shane; Aimee Martin; Veronique Weinstein; Robert Pilarski; Joanne Jeter; Kevin Sweet; Bonnie Hatten; Elisabeth J Wurtmann; Shanda Phippen; Della Bro; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Beliefs about Genetically Targeted Care in African Americans.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Jasmine A McDonald; Gayenell Magwood; Melanie Jefferson
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Genetic counseling content: How does it impact health behavior?

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Lee Ellington; Nancy Schoenberg; Thomas Jackson; Stephanie Dickinson; Kyle Porter; Howard Leventhal; Michael Andrykowski
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-12-23

Review 7.  Impact of genetic risk assessment on nutrition-related lifestyle behaviours.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Vernarelli
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 6.297

8.  Conveying genomic recurrence risk estimates to patients with early-stage breast cancer: oncologist perspectives.

Authors:  Elizabeth Spellman; Nadiyah Sulayman; Susan Eggly; Beth N Peshkin; Claudine Isaacs; Marc D Schwartz; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Intentions for bilateral mastectomy among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Lesley King; Suzanne C O'Neill; Elizabeth Spellman; Beth N Peshkin; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Shawna Willey; Kara Grace Leventhal; Tiffani DeMarco; Rachel Nusbaum; Elizabeth Feldman; Lina Jandorf; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Comparison of the screening practices of unaffected noncarriers under 40 and between 40 and 49 in BRCA1/2 families.

Authors:  Christelle Duprez; Véronique Christophe; Isabelle Milhabet; Aurélie Krzeminski; Claude Adenis; Pascaline Berthet; Jean-Philippe Peyrat; Philippe Vennin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.