Literature DB >> 12376518

Utilization of breast cancer screening in a clinically based sample of women after BRCA1/2 testing.

Beth N Peshkin1, Marc D Schwartz, Claudine Isaacs, Chanita Hughes, David Main, Caryn Lerman.   

Abstract

We conducted a prospective, observational study to determine breast cancer screening practices among self-referred high-risk women who pursued genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Of the 107 unaffected women included in this study, 41 were BRCA1/2 carriers and 66 women tested negative for a mutation previously identified in their family. All of the women underwent comprehensive pre- and posttest genetic counseling, and completed baseline and 12-month follow-up telephone interviews. The baseline (pretest) interview assessed potential predictors of mammography use, including demographics and psychosocial variables. During the year after the receipt of BRCA1/2 test results, 47% of the noncarriers and 59% of the carriers reported that they had had a mammogram [chi(2) (1, n = 107) = 1.35; P = 0.24]. Only 39% of carriers ages 25-39 reported having a mammogram, versus 74% of carriers age > or =40 [chi(2) (1, n = 41) = 5.10; P = 0.02]. Among noncarriers ages 50 and older, 83% had an annual mammogram. Factors independently associated with mammography use included age (<40, > or =40; odds ratio, 7.5; confidence interval, 2.6-21.5) and test result (odds ratio, 4.6; confidence interval, 1.1-18.7). The effects of perceived likelihood of having a BRCA1/2 gene alteration and the interaction between test result and perceived likelihood were not significant. As expected, most carriers (95%) and noncarriers (77%) obtained a clinical breast exam within the year after the receipt of test results. These data suggest that in carriers, overall, the use of breast cancer screening including mammography is good, although there was a relatively low uptake rate of mammography in younger carriers. Noncarriers had very good adherence to general population screening guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12376518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  25 in total

1.  The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Screening behavior in women at increased familial risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Yoland C Antill; John Reynolds; Mary Anne Young; Judy A Kirk; Katherine M Tucker; Tarli L Bogtstra; Shirley S Wong; Tracy E Dudding; Juliana L Di Iulio; Kelly-Anne Phillips
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Longitudinal changes in patient distress following interactive decision aid use among BRCA1/2 carriers: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Gillian W Hooker; Kara-Grace Leventhal; Tiffani DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Clinton Finch; Erica Wahl; Jessica Rispoli Joines; Karen Brown; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 4.  How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Glyn Elwyn; Clara L Gaff; Angus J Clarke; Rachel Iredale; Chris Shaw; Joanna Dundon; Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Predictors of choosing life-long screening or prophylactic surgery in women at high and moderate risk for breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  J R J De Leeuw; M J van Vliet; M G E M Ausems
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 6.  Patient responses to genetic information: studies of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes identify issues for use of genetic testing in nephrology practice.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.299

Review 7.  Ethical issues of predictive genetic testing for diabetes.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

8.  Considerations for the impact of personal genome information: a study of genomic profiling among genetics and genomics professionals.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel; Susanne B Haga; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Predictors of decision making in families at risk for inherited breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Mellon; James Janisse; Robin Gold; Michelle Cichon; Lisa Berry-Bobovski; Michael A Tainsky; Michael S Simon
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.267

10.  Randomized trial of a decision aid for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers: impact on measures of decision making and satisfaction.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; William Lawrence; Jessica Rispoli; Karen Brown; Claudine Isaacs; Suzanne O'Neill; Rebecca Shelby; Sherry C Grumet; Margaret M McGovern; Sarah Garnett; Heather Bremer; Suzanne Leaman; Kathryn O'Mara; Sarah Kelleher; Kathryn Komaridis
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.