Literature DB >> 19885732

Breast cancer risks in individuals testing negative for a known family mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2.

S M Domchek1, M M Gaudet, J E Stopfer, M H Fleischaut, J Powers, N Kauff, K Offit, K L Nathanson, M Robson.   

Abstract

Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in family members of individuals with known deleterious mutations can distinguish between patients at high risk of disease and those who are not. Some studies have suggested that individuals testing negative for known familial mutations (true negatives), may still have a higher risk of breast cancer (BC) than the general population. We have examined a prospectively followed cohort of true negative women in the US. Subjects were close relatives of known BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers who had undergone genetic testing, were negative for the known familial mutation, and were unaffected at the time of genetic testing. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using SEER incidence rates. Among 375 true negatives, two invasive and two in situ BC and no ovarian cancers were diagnosed with mean follow up of 4.9 years (total of 1,962 person years).Four invasive BC were expected, whereas two were observed, for an age-adjusted SIR of 0.52 (95% CI 0.13-2.09). We observed more cases of in situ BC (n = 2) than were expected (n = 0.9; SIR = 2.30; 95% CI 0.57-9.19).There were no cases of ovarian cancer observed; 0.4 case was expected. In this prospective study of women who were unaffected at the time of genetic testing and who were negative for the known familial mutation in BRCA1/2, no excess risk of invasive BC was observed. Our data suggest that such women in the US should adhere to population based guidelines for breast cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19885732     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0611-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  24 in total

1.  No evidence of excess breast cancer risk among mutation-negative women from BRCA mutation-positive families.

Authors:  Larissa A Korde; Christine M Mueller; Jennifer T Loud; Jeffery P Struewing; Kathy Nichols; Mark H Greene; Phuong L Mai
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Can chimerism explain breast/ovarian cancers in BRCA non-carriers from BRCA-positive families?

Authors:  Rachel Mitchell; Lela Buckingham; Melody Cobleigh; Jacob Rotmensch; Kelly Burgess; Lydia Usha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Antimüllerian hormone levels are lower in BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Lauren Johnson; Mary D Sammel; Susan Domchek; Allison Schanne; Maureen Prewitt; Clarisa Gracia
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Estrogen controls the survival of BRCA1-deficient cells via a PI3K-NRF2-regulated pathway.

Authors:  Chiara Gorrini; Bevan P Gang; Christian Bassi; Andrew Wakeham; Shakiba Pegah Baniasadi; Zhenyue Hao; Wanda Y Li; David W Cescon; Yen-Ting Li; Sam Molyneux; Nadia Penrod; Mathieu Lupien; Edward E Schmidt; Vuk Stambolic; Mona L Gauthier; Tak W Mak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  BRCA1/2 test results impact risk management attitudes, intentions, and uptake.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Tiffani A Demarco; Beth N Peshkin; Kristi D Graves; Karen Brown; Karen E Hurley; Claudine Isaacs; Sharon Hecker; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  No evidence of increased breast cancer risk for proven noncarriers from BRCA1 and BRCA2 families.

Authors:  Henriette Roed Nielsen; Janne Petersen; Lotte Krogh; Mef Nilbert; Anne-Bine Skytte
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Information and support needs of young women regarding breast cancer risk and genetic testing: adapting effective interventions for a novel population.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Chalanda Evans; Rebekah J Hamilton; Beth N Peshkin; Claudine Isaacs; Sue Friedman; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 8.  The oviduct and ovarian cancer: causality, clinical implications, and "targeted prevention".

Authors:  Christopher P Crum; Frank D McKeon; Wa Xian
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.190

9.  Is the psychological impact of genetic testing moderated by support and sharing of test results to family and friends?

Authors:  Julie Lapointe; Michel Dorval; Catherine Noguès; Roxane Fabre; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Comparison of the screening practices of unaffected noncarriers under 40 and between 40 and 49 in BRCA1/2 families.

Authors:  Christelle Duprez; Véronique Christophe; Isabelle Milhabet; Aurélie Krzeminski; Claude Adenis; Pascaline Berthet; Jean-Philippe Peyrat; Philippe Vennin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.