Literature DB >> 18421122

Can megavoltage computed tomography reduce proton range uncertainties in treatment plans for patients with large metal implants?

Wayne D Newhauser1, Annelise Giebeler, Katja M Langen, Dragan Mirkovic, Radhe Mohan.   

Abstract

Treatment planning calculations for proton therapy require an accurate knowledge of radiological path length, or range, to the distal edge of the target volume. In most cases, the range may be calculated with sufficient accuracy using kilovoltage (kV) computed tomography (CT) images. However, metal implants such as hip prostheses can cause severe streak artifacts that lead to large uncertainties in proton range. The purposes of this study were to quantify streak-related range errors and to determine if they could be avoided by using artifact-free megavoltage (MV) CT images in treatment planning. Proton treatment plans were prepared for a rigid, heterogeneous phantom and for a prostate cancer patient with a metal hip prosthesis using corrected and uncorrected kVCT images alone, uncorrected MVCT images and a combination of registered MVCT and kVCT images (the hybrid approach). Streak-induced range errors of 5-12 mm were present in the uncorrected kVCT-based patient plan. Correcting the streaks by manually assigning estimated true Hounsfield units improved the range accuracy. In a rigid heterogeneous phantom, the implant-related range uncertainty was estimated at <3 mm for both the corrected kVCT-based plan and the uncorrected MVCT-based plan. The hybrid planning approach yielded the best overall result. In this approach, the kVCT images provided good delineation of soft tissues due to high-contrast resolution, and the streak-free MVCT images provided smaller range uncertainties because they did not require artifact correction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18421122      PMCID: PMC4120878          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/9/009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  22 in total

1.  Dose calculation models for proton treatment planning using a dynamic beam delivery system: an attempt to include density heterogeneity effects in the analytical dose calculation.

Authors:  B Schaffner; E Pedroni; A Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  An iterative maximum-likelihood polychromatic algorithm for CT.

Authors:  B De Man; J Nuyts; P Dupont; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Fast iterative algorithm for metal artifact reduction in X-ray CT.

Authors:  G Wang; T Frei; M W Vannier
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Range, range modulation, and field radius requirements for proton therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  M F Moyers; D W Miller
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2003-10

5.  Calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning of patients with metallic hip prostheses: the use of the extended CT-scale.

Authors:  C Coolens; P J Childs
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Image guidance for precise conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  Thomas Rockwell Mackie; Jeff Kapatoes; Ken Ruchala; Weiguo Lu; Chuan Wu; Gustavo Olivera; Lisa Forrest; Wolfgang Tome; Jim Welsh; Robert Jeraj; Paul Harari; Paul Reckwerdt; Bhudatt Paliwal; Mark Ritter; Harry Keller; Jack Fowler; Minesh Mehta
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Radiation characteristics of helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Robert Jeraj; Thomas R Mackie; John Balog; Gustavo Olivera; Dave Pearson; Jeff Kapatoes; Ken Ruchala; Paul Reckwerdt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Computed tomography with a linear accelerator with radiotherapy applications.

Authors:  W Swindell; R G Simpson; J R Oleson; C T Chen; E A Grubbs
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  A 4-MV CT scanner for radiation therapy: the prototype system.

Authors:  R G Simpson; C T Chen; E A Grubbs; W Swindell
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Proton therapy for prostate cancer: the initial Loma Linda University experience.

Authors:  Jerry D Slater; Carl J Rossi; Les T Yonemoto; David A Bush; B Rodney Jabola; Richard P Levy; Roger I Grove; William Preston; James M Slater
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  30 in total

1.  Predicted risks of second malignant neoplasm incidence and mortality due to secondary neutrons in a girl and boy receiving proton craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Anita Mahajan; Dragan Mirkovic; Rui Zhang; Annelise Giebeler; David Kornguth; Mark Harvey; Shiao Woo; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Risk of second malignant neoplasm following proton versus intensity-modulated photon radiotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Rebecca M Howell; Sunil Krishnan; Sarah B Scarboro; Dragan Mirkovic; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A TRACK-REPEATING ALGORITHM FOR FAST MONTE CARLO DOSE CALCULATIONS OF PROTON RADIOTHERAPY.

Authors:  Pablo Yepes; Sharmalee Randeniya; Phillip J Taddei; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Nucl Technol       Date:  2009-12-01

4.  Effective Dose from Stray Radiation for a Patient Receiving Proton Therapy for Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Sunil Krishnan; Dragan Mirkovic; Pablo Yepes; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2009-03-10

5.  REDUCING STRAY RADIATION DOSE FOR A PEDIATRIC PATIENT RECEIVING PROTON CRANIOSPINAL IRRADIATION.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Dragan Mirkovic; Jonas D Fontenot; Annelise Giebeler; Yuanshui Zheng; Uwe Titt; Shiao Woo; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Nucl Technol       Date:  2009-10-01

6.  Water equivalent thickness values of materials used in beams of protons, helium, carbon and iron ions.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Phillip J Taddei; Markus M Fitzek; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Dosimetric accuracy of proton therapy for chordoma patients with titanium implants.

Authors:  Joost M Verburg; Joao Seco
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  The physics of proton therapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Assessing the risk of second malignancies after modern radiotherapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Marco Durante
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Site-specific range uncertainties caused by dose calculation algorithms for proton therapy.

Authors:  J Schuemann; S Dowdell; C Grassberger; C H Min; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.