AIMS: To investigate the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and incidence of diabetes. METHODS: We investigated three measures of SES and incidence of diagnosed diabetes among women and men in the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study, 1971-1992, who were free of diagnosed diabetes in 1980. RESULTS: Among women, diabetes incidence was inversely associated with income (measured as percent of the poverty level), education, and occupational status, adjusting for age and race/ethnicity. The hazard ratio (HR) for women with > 16 years education was 0.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13-0.54) relative to those with < 9 years of education. Adjustment for potential mediators, including body size variables, diet, physical activity, and alcohol and tobacco use, substantially attenuated the associations with income and education. Among men a trend toward lower diabetes incidence with higher income and higher education was evident (the HR for men with household income > 5 times the poverty level was 0.44 (95% CI 0.19-0.98) relative to those under the poverty line), but there was no inverse association of diabetes incidence with occupational status. CONCLUSIONS: SES, assessed with any of three common measures, is a risk factor for diagnosed diabetes in women. Among men these associations are less consistent.
AIMS: To investigate the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and incidence of diabetes. METHODS: We investigated three measures of SES and incidence of diagnosed diabetes among women and men in the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study, 1971-1992, who were free of diagnosed diabetes in 1980. RESULTS: Among women, diabetes incidence was inversely associated with income (measured as percent of the poverty level), education, and occupational status, adjusting for age and race/ethnicity. The hazard ratio (HR) for women with > 16 years education was 0.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13-0.54) relative to those with < 9 years of education. Adjustment for potential mediators, including body size variables, diet, physical activity, and alcohol and tobacco use, substantially attenuated the associations with income and education. Among men a trend toward lower diabetes incidence with higher income and higher education was evident (the HR for men with household income > 5 times the poverty level was 0.44 (95% CI 0.19-0.98) relative to those under the poverty line), but there was no inverse association of diabetes incidence with occupational status. CONCLUSIONS: SES, assessed with any of three common measures, is a risk factor for diagnosed diabetes in women. Among men these associations are less consistent.
Authors: N Mansournia; S Riyahi; S Tofangchiha; M A Mansournia; M Riahi; Z Heidari; E Hazrati Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Mario Sims; Ana V Diez Roux; Shawn Boykin; Daniel Sarpong; Samson Y Gebreab; Sharon B Wyatt; DeMarc Hickson; Marinelle Payton; Lynette Ekunwe; Herman A Taylor Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Sherita Hill Golden; Arleen Brown; Jane A Cauley; Marshall H Chin; Tiffany L Gary-Webb; Catherine Kim; Julie Ann Sosa; Anne E Sumner; Blair Anton Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Luis Palomo; Francisco-Javier Félix-Redondo; Luis Lozano-Mera; José-Fernando Pérez-Castán; Daniel Fernández-Berges; Francisco Buitrago Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Victoria L Mayer; Nita Vangeepuram; Kezhen Fei; Emily A Hanlen-Rosado; Guedy Arniella; Rennie Negron; Ashley Fox; Kate Lorig; Carol R Horowitz Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2019-08-23