Literature DB >> 8745106

Is general practitioner decision making associated with patient socio-economic status?

A Scott1, A Shiell, M King.   

Abstract

This paper presents a preliminary exploration into the relationship between decisions made by general practitioners (GPs) and the socio-economic status (SES) of patients. There is a large literature on the association between SES, health state and the use of health services, but relatively little has been published on the association between SES and decisions by clinicians once a patient is in the health system. The associations between GP decision making and the patient's SES, health status, gender and insurance status are examined using logit analysis. Three sets of binary choices are analysed: the decision to follow up; to prescribe; and to perform or to order a diagnostic test. Secondary data on consultations for a check up/examination were used to explore these relationships. The results suggest that SES is associated independently with the decision to test and the decision to prescribe but not with the decision to follow up. Patients of high SES are, ceteris paribus, more likely to be tested and less likely to receive a prescription compared with patients of low SES. Women are more likely to be tested and to receive a prescription than men. These findings have implications for the pursuit of equity as a goal of health services policy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8745106     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00063-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  29 in total

1.  Medical schools, affirmative action, and the neglected role of social class.

Authors:  S A Magnus; S S Mick
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Unequal to the task: deprivation, health and UK general practice at the millennium.

Authors:  N Beale
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Non-clinical influences on clinical decision-making: a major challenge to evidence-based practice.

Authors:  F M Hajjaj; M S Salek; M K A Basra; A Y Finlay
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Recommended drug use after acute myocardial infarction by migration status and education level.

Authors:  Dashti Ali Mustafa Dzayee; Tahereh Moradi; Omid Beiki; Lars Alfredsson; Rickard Ljung
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Variations in activity and practice patterns: a French study for GPs.

Authors:  Sophie Béjean; Christine Peyron; Renaud Urbinelli
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2007-02-06

6.  The effect of socioeconomic status on access to primary care: an audit study.

Authors:  Michelle E Olah; Gregory Gaisano; Stephen W Hwang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  The intended and unintended consequences of clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Rebecca J Shackelton; Lisa D Marceau; Carol L Link; John B McKinlay
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  Does patient educational level affect office visits to family physicians?

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Meredith A Goodwin; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.798

9.  Physician evaluation of obesity in health surveys: "who are you calling fat?".

Authors:  Kenneth F Ferraro; Kimberlee B Holland
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Better access to outpatient magnetic resonance imaging in Ontario - But for whom?

Authors:  John J You; Vikram Venkatesh; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2009-03-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.