Literature DB >> 15777684

Proximal femur bone geometry is appropriately adapted to lean mass in overweight children and adolescents.

Moira A Petit1, Thomas J Beck, Justine Shults, Babette S Zemel, Bethany J Foster, Mary B Leonard.   

Abstract

It is unclear if the bones of overweight children are appropriately adapted to increased loads. The objective of this study was to compare bone geometry in 40 overweight (body mass index [BMI] > 85th percentile) and 94 healthy weight (BMI < or = 85th percentile) subjects, ages 4-20 years. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (Hologic QDR 2000) scans were analyzed at the femoral shaft (FS) and narrow neck (NN) by the Hip Structure Analysis program. Subperiosteal width, cortical thickness and indices of bone axial and bending strength (bone cross-sectional area [CSA] and section modulus [Z]) were measured from bone mass profiles. Multivariate regression models were used to compare overweight and healthy weight subjects. Z was 11 (95% CI 5, 19) and 13 (7, 20) percent higher at the FS and NN, respectively, in overweight subjects (P < 0.001), adjusted for height, maturation and gender. At the NN, higher Z was due to greater subperiosteal width [4% (2, 7)] and bone CSA [10% (5, 16]) and at the FS, to higher bone CSA [10% (5, 16)] and thicker cortices [9% (3, 15)]. When lean mass was added to the models, bone variables did not differ between overweight and healthy weight subjects (P > 0.22), with the exception of NN subperiosteal width [3% (0, 6), P = 0.04]. Fat mass did not contribute significantly to any model. In summary, proximal femur bone geometric strength in overweight children was appropriately adapted to lean mass and height but greater weight in the form of fat mass did not have an independent effect on bone bending strength. These geometric adaptations are consistent with the mechanostat hypothesis that bone strength adapts primarily to muscle forces, not to static loads represented by body weight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15777684     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  67 in total

1.  Bone and fat relationships in postadolescent black females: a pQCT study.

Authors:  N K Pollock; E M Laing; M W Hamrick; C A Baile; D B Hall; R D Lewis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Associations of fat mass and fat distribution with bone mineral density in pre- and postmenopausal Chinese women.

Authors:  X Fu; X Ma; H Lu; W He; Z Wang; S Zhu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Femoral neck geometry in overweight and normal weight adolescent girls.

Authors:  Rawad El Hage; Elie Moussa; Christophe Jacob
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Influence of age and morphological characteristics on whole body, lumbar spine, femoral neck and 1/3 radius bone mineral apparent density in a group of Lebanese adolescent boys.

Authors:  Rawad El Hage; Elie Moussa; Zaher El Hage; Denis Theunynck; Christophe Jacob
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Lower bone mass in prepubertal overweight children with prediabetes.

Authors:  Norman K Pollock; Paul J Bernard; Karl Wenger; Sudipta Misra; Barbara A Gower; Jerry D Allison; Haidong Zhu; Catherine L Davis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 6.  Examining the link between bariatric surgery, bone loss, and osteoporosis: a review of bone density studies.

Authors:  Lesley M Scibora; Sayeed Ikramuddin; Henry Buchwald; Moira A Petit
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Genetic determination and correlation of body weight and body mass index (BMI) and cross-sectional geometric parameters of the femoral neck.

Authors:  Hong Xu; Ji-Rong Long; Yan-Jun Yang; Fei-Yan Deng; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Extending DXA beyond bone mineral density: understanding hip structure analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Beck
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  Tibia and radius bone geometry and volumetric density in obese compared to non-obese adolescents.

Authors:  Mary B Leonard; Babette S Zemel; Brian H Wrotniak; Sarah B Klieger; Justine Shults; Virginia A Stallings; Nicolas Stettler
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Does obesity really make the femur stronger? BMD, geometry, and fracture incidence in the women's health initiative-observational study.

Authors:  Thomas J Beck; Moira A Petit; Guanglin Wu; Meryl S LeBoff; Jane A Cauley; Zhao Chen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.