Literature DB >> 14504711

Measuring the structural strength of bones with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: principles, technical limitations, and future possibilities.

Thomas Beck.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 14504711     DOI： 10.1007/s00198-003-1478-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN： 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


× No keyword cloud information.
  15 in total

1.  Disproportionate, age-related bone loss in long bone ends: a structural analysis based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  H Sievänen; K Uusi-Rasi; A Heinonen; P Oja; I Vuori
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Accuracy of CT-based thickness measurement of thin structures: modeling of limited spatial resolution in all three dimensions.

Authors:  Sven Prevrhal; Julia C Fox; John A Shepherd; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Measurement of mechanical properties of bone material in vitro by ultrasound reflection: methodology and comparison with ultrasound transmission.

Authors:  P P Antich; J A Anderson; R B Ashman; J E Dowdey; J Gonzales; R C Murry; J E Zerwekh; C Y Pak
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Bone dimensional change with age: interactions of genetic, hormonal, and body size variables.

Authors:  R P Heaney; M J Barger-Lux; K M Davies; R A Ryan; M L Johnson; G Gong
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Age and sex-related changes in the structure and strength of the human femoral shaft.

Authors:  R B Martin; P J Atkinson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure.

Authors:  R W McCalden; J A McGeough; M B Barker; C M Court-Brown
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Non-invasive measurement of long bone cross-sectional moment of inertia by photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  R B Martin; D B Burr
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Subperiosteal expansion and cortical remodeling of the human femur and tibia with aging.

Authors:  C B Ruff; W C Hayes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-09-03       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Effects of current and discontinued estrogen replacement therapy on hip structural geometry: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  T J Beck; K L Stone; T L Oreskovic; M C Hochberg; M C Nevitt; H K Genant; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Age-related differences in cross-sectional geometry of the forearm bones in healthy women.

Authors:  M L Bouxsein; K H Myburgh; M C van der Meulen; E Lindenberger; R Marcus
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.333
View more
  47 in total

1.  Femoral neck geometry in overweight and normal weight adolescent girls.

Authors:  Rawad El Hage; Elie Moussa; Christophe Jacob
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Dynamic bone quality: a noninvasive measure of bone's biomechanical property in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Amit Bhattacharya; Nelson B Watts; Kermit Davis; Susan Kotowski; Rakesh Shukla; Alok Kumar Dwivedi; Robert Coleman
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 3.  Bone geometry and skeletal fragility.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; David Karasik
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Age trends in proximal femur geometry in men: variation by race and ethnicity.

Authors:  T G Travison; T J Beck; G R Esche; A B Araujo; J B McKinlay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Does lean tissue mass accrual during adolescence influence bone structural strength at the proximal femur in young adulthood?

Authors:  S A Jackowski; J L Lanovaz; C Van Oort; A D G Baxter-Jones
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Effect of monthly ibandronate on hip structural geometry in men with low bone density.

Authors:  H K Genant; E M Lewiecki; T Fuerst; M Fries
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Lean mass and not fat mass is associated with male proximal femur strength.

Authors:  Thomas G Travison; Andre B Araujo; Gretchen R Esche; Thomas J Beck; John B McKinlay
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Association analysis of estrogen receptor alpha gene polymorphisms with cross-sectional geometry of the femoral neck in Caucasian nuclear families.

Authors:  Dong-Hai Xiong; Yao-Zhong Liu; Peng-Yuan Liu; Lan-Juan Zhao; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Can Hip Fracture Prediction in Women be Estimated beyond Bone Mineral Density Measurement Alone?

Authors:  Piet Geusens; Tineke van Geel; Joop van den Bergh
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.346

10.  Compressive axial mechanical properties of rat bone as functions of bone volume fraction, apparent density and micro-ct based mineral density.

Authors:  Esther Cory; Ara Nazarian; Vahid Entezari; Vartan Vartanians; Ralph Müller; Brian D Snyder
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 2.712
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.