Literature DB >> 23377838

Adolescent and young adult exposure to physical activity and breast density.

Kelley Pettee Gabriel1, Catherine Klifa, Adriana Pérez, Andrea M Kriska, Robin R High, Linda Snetselaar, Joanne F Dorgan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to examine the role of early lifetime exposure to physical activity on magnetic resonance imaging-determined breast density measures.
METHODS: Associations of adolescent (high school (ages 14-17 yr) and early adulthood, post-high school (ages 18-21 yr) and past year) leisure-time physical activity, as well as a principal component score including all three estimates, were examined with percent dense breast volume (%DBV) and absolute dense breast volume (ADBV) in a cross-sectional analysis of 182 healthy women, ages 25-29 yr, enrolled in the Dietary Intervention Study in Children Follow-up Study (DISC06). Generalized linear mixed models were used to examine associations after adjustment for relevant covariates for the entire analytic sample. Analyses were repeated in nulliparous women and hormonal contraceptive nonusers.
RESULTS: Physical activity during high school and post-high school were not statistically significantly related to %DBV or ADBV in multivariable models. Past year physical activity was positively related to %DBV in the unadjusted and partially adjusted models (P < 0.001 and P = 0.01, respectively), which did not adjust for body mass index (BMI). After additional adjustment for childhood and early adulthood BMI, this association became nonstatistically significant. The relation between past year physical activity and ADBV was not statistically significant. These findings were similar in nonusers of hormonal contraceptives. No statistically significant relations were found in nulliparous women or between the principal component score and %DBV or ADBV.
CONCLUSION: Results from this study are consistent with previous research suggesting that physical activity during adolescence and early adulthood is unrelated to breast density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23377838      PMCID: PMC3897238          DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318289a7f8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  37 in total

Review 1.  The effects of intense exercise on the female reproductive system.

Authors:  M P Warren; N E Perlroth
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  Menstrual cycle characteristics and history of ovulatory infertility in relation to breast cancer risk in a large cohort of US women.

Authors:  M Garland; D J Hunter; G A Colditz; J E Manson; M J Stampfer; D Spiegelman; F Speizer; W C Willett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  The assessment of historical physical activity and its relation to adult bone parameters.

Authors:  A M Kriska; R B Sandler; J A Cauley; R E LaPorte; D L Hom; G Pambianco
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Development of questionnaire to examine relationship of physical activity and diabetes in Pima Indians.

Authors:  A M Kriska; W C Knowler; R E LaPorte; A L Drash; R R Wing; S N Blair; P H Bennett; L H Kuller
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 5.  Physical activity and mammographic breast density: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham A Colditz; Kathleen Wolin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Johanna M Rommens; Kelly Vogt; Vivian Lee; John L Hopper; Martin J Yaffe; Andrew D Paterson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Body size, physical activity, and breast cancer hormone receptor status: results from two case-control studies.

Authors:  S M Enger; R K Ross; A Paganini-Hill; C L Carpenter; L Bernstein
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Adolescent lifestyle factors and adult breast density in U.S. Chinese immigrant women.

Authors:  Marilyn Tseng; Temitope O Olufade; Kathryn A Evers; Celia Byrne
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.900

9.  Recreational physical activity and mammographic breast density characteristics.

Authors:  Katherine W Reeves; Gretchen L Gierach; Francesmary Modugno
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  Lisa J Martin; Norman F Boyd
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  7 in total

1.  Endogenous sex hormones and breast density in young women.

Authors:  Seungyoun Jung; Frank Z Stanczyk; Brian L Egleston; Linda G Snetselaar; Victor J Stevens; John A Shepherd; Linda Van Horn; Erin S LeBlanc; Kenneth Paris; Catherine Klifa; Joanne F Dorgan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Early Life Body Fatness, Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone, and Breast Density in Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Kimberly A Bertrand; Heather J Baer; E John Orav; Catherine Klifa; Ajay Kumar; Nola M Hylton; Erin S LeBlanc; Linda G Snetselaar; Linda Van Horn; Joanne F Dorgan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Dietary energy density is positively associated with breast density among young women.

Authors:  Jessica A Jones; Terryl J Hartman; Catherine S Klifa; Donna L Coffman; Diane C Mitchell; Jacqueline A Vernarelli; Linda G Snetselaar; Linda Van Horn; Victor J Stevens; Alan M Robson; John H Himes; John A Shepherd; Joanne F Dorgan
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.910

4.  Body fatness during childhood and adolescence and breast density in young women: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  Kimberly A Bertrand; Heather J Baer; E John Orav; Catherine Klifa; John A Shepherd; Linda Van Horn; Linda Snetselaar; Victor J Stevens; Nola M Hylton; Joanne F Dorgan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Association between the Adherence to the International Guidelines for Cancer Prevention and Mammographic Density.

Authors:  Adela Castelló; Leandro Prieto; María Ederra; Dolores Salas-Trejo; Carmen Vidal; Carmen Sánchez-Contador; Carmen Santamariña; Carmen Pedraz; Pilar Moreo; Nuria Aragonés; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Virginia Lope; Jesús Vioque; Marina Pollán
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide.

Authors:  Anya Burton; Gertraud Maskarinec; Beatriz Perez-Gomez; Celine Vachon; Hui Miao; Martín Lajous; Ruy López-Ridaura; Megan Rice; Ana Pereira; Maria Luisa Garmendia; Rulla M Tamimi; Kimberly Bertrand; Ava Kwong; Giske Ursin; Eunjung Lee; Samera A Qureshi; Huiyan Ma; Sarah Vinnicombe; Sue Moss; Steve Allen; Rose Ndumia; Sudhir Vinayak; Soo-Hwang Teo; Shivaani Mariapun; Farhana Fadzli; Beata Peplonska; Agnieszka Bukowska; Chisato Nagata; Jennifer Stone; John Hopper; Graham Giles; Vahit Ozmen; Mustafa Erkin Aribal; Joachim Schüz; Carla H Van Gils; Johanna O P Wanders; Reza Sirous; Mehri Sirous; John Hipwell; Jisun Kim; Jong Won Lee; Caroline Dickens; Mikael Hartman; Kee-Seng Chia; Christopher Scott; Anna M Chiarelli; Linda Linton; Marina Pollan; Anath Arzee Flugelman; Dorria Salem; Rasha Kamal; Norman Boyd; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Valerie McCormack
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 7.  The epidemiologic factors associated with breast density: A review.

Authors:  Dong-Man Ye; Tao Yu
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 1.985

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.