Literature DB >> 33312342

Mammographic density: intersection of advocacy, science, and clinical practice.

Katherine Tossas-Milligan1, Sundus Shalabi2,3, Veronica Jones2, Patricia J Keely4, Matthew W Conklin4, Kevin W Elicerie4, Robert Winn1, Christopher Sistrunk2, Joseph Geradts2, Gustavo Miranda-Carboni5, Eric C Dietze2, Lisa D Yee2, Victoria L Seewaldt3.   

Abstract

Purpose: Here we aim to review the association between mammographic density, collagen structure and breast cancer risk. Findings: While mammographic density is a strong predictor of breast cancer risk in populations, studies by Boyd show that mammographic density does not predict breast cancer risk in individuals. Mammographic density is affected by age, parity, menopausal status, race/ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI).New studies normalize mammographic density to BMI may provide a more accurate way to compare mammographic density in women of diverse race and ethnicity. Preclinical and tissue-based studies have investigated the role collagen composition and structure in predicting breast cancer risk. There is emerging evidence that collagen structure may activate signaling pathways associated with aggressive breast cancer biology. Summary: Measurement of film mammographic density does not adequately capture the complex signaling that occurs in women with at-risk collagen. New ways to measure at-risk collagen potentially can provide a more accurate view of risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mammographic density; TACS; breast cancer risk; collagen; mammographic density notification; tissue tensile forces

Year:  2019        PMID: 33312342      PMCID: PMC7728377          DOI: 10.1007/s12609-019-00316-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep        ISSN: 1943-4588


  88 in total

Review 1.  Second-harmonic imaging microscopy for visualizing biomolecular arrays in cells, tissues and organisms.

Authors:  Paul J Campagnola; Leslie M Loew
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Macrophages promote the invasion of breast carcinoma cells via a colony-stimulating factor-1/epidermal growth factor paracrine loop.

Authors:  Sumanta Goswami; Erik Sahai; Jeffrey B Wyckoff; Michael Cammer; Dianne Cox; Fiona J Pixley; E Richard Stanley; Jeffrey E Segall; John S Condeelis
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  A randomized trial of dietary intervention for breast cancer prevention.

Authors:  Lisa J Martin; Qing Li; Olga Melnichouk; Cary Greenberg; Salomon Minkin; Greg Hislop; Norman F Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Johanna M Rommens; Kelly Vogt; Vivian Lee; John L Hopper; Martin J Yaffe; Andrew D Paterson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Diana L Miglioretti; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Karla Kerlikowske; Robert Rosenberg; Carolyn M Rutter; Berta M Geller; Linn A Abraham; Steven H Taplin; Mark Dignan; Gary Cutter; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Stroma in breast development and disease.

Authors:  Lisa M Arendt; Jenny A Rudnick; Patricia J Keller; Charlotte Kuperwasser
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 7.727

7.  Nuclear actin regulates dynamic subcellular localization and activity of the SRF cofactor MAL.

Authors:  Maria K Vartiainen; Sebastian Guettler; Banafshe Larijani; Richard Treisman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Stromal changes in invasive breast carcinoma: an ultrastructural study.

Authors:  S O Tamimi; A Ahmed
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 7.996

9.  Focal contacts as mechanosensors: externally applied local mechanical force induces growth of focal contacts by an mDia1-dependent and ROCK-independent mechanism.

Authors:  D Riveline; E Zamir; N Q Balaban; U S Schwarz; T Ishizaki; S Narumiya; Z Kam; B Geiger; A D Bershadsky
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-06-11       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 10.  Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density.

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  1 in total

1.  Mammographic Density Laws and Inclusion-Time for Change.

Authors:  Katherine Y Tossas; Robert A Winn; Victoria L Seewaldt
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 33.006

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.