PURPOSE: To investigate the association between physical activity (PA) and mammographic density in the year before diagnosis in a population-based sample of 474 women diagnosed with stage 0-IIIA breast cancer and enrolled in the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle Study. METHODS: We collected information on PA during an interview administered at a baseline visit scheduled within the first year after diagnosis. Participants recalled the type, duration, and frequency of different PAs for the year prior to their diagnosis. Dense area and percent density were estimated, from mammograms imaged approximately 1 year before diagnosis, as a continuous measure using a computer-assisted software program. Analysis of covariance methods were used to obtain mean density across PA tertiles adjusted for confounders. We stratified analyses by menopausal status and body mass index (BMI) because these factors strongly influence density. RESULTS: We observed a statistically significant decline in mammographic dense area (p for trend = 0.046) and percent density (p for trend = 0.026) with increasing level of sports/recreational PA in postmenopausal women with a BMI > or = 30 kg/m2. Conversely, in premenopausal women with a BMI < 30 kg/m2, we observed a statistically significant increase in percent density with increasing level of sports/recreational PA (p for trend = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Both mammographic dense area and percent density are inversely related to level of sports/recreational PA in obese postmenopausal women. Increasing PA among obese postmenopausal women may be a reasonable intervention approach to reduce mammographic density.
PURPOSE: To investigate the association between physical activity (PA) and mammographic density in the year before diagnosis in a population-based sample of 474 women diagnosed with stage 0-IIIA breast cancer and enrolled in the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle Study. METHODS: We collected information on PA during an interview administered at a baseline visit scheduled within the first year after diagnosis. Participants recalled the type, duration, and frequency of different PAs for the year prior to their diagnosis. Dense area and percent density were estimated, from mammograms imaged approximately 1 year before diagnosis, as a continuous measure using a computer-assisted software program. Analysis of covariance methods were used to obtain mean density across PA tertiles adjusted for confounders. We stratified analyses by menopausal status and body mass index (BMI) because these factors strongly influence density. RESULTS: We observed a statistically significant decline in mammographic dense area (p for trend = 0.046) and percent density (p for trend = 0.026) with increasing level of sports/recreational PA in postmenopausal women with a BMI > or = 30 kg/m2. Conversely, in premenopausal women with a BMI < 30 kg/m2, we observed a statistically significant increase in percent density with increasing level of sports/recreational PA (p for trend = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Both mammographic dense area and percent density are inversely related to level of sports/recreational PA in obese postmenopausal women. Increasing PA among obese postmenopausal women may be a reasonable intervention approach to reduce mammographic density.
Authors: Olga Pawluczyk; Bindu J Augustine; Martin J Yaffe; Dan Rico; Jiwei Yang; Gordon E Mawdsley; Norman F Boyd Journal: Med Phys Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Pilar López; Linda Van Horn; Laura A Colangelo; Judith A Wolfman; R Edward Hendrick; Susan M Gapstur Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2003-12-20 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Anne McTiernan; Shelley S Tworoger; Cornelia M Ulrich; Yutaka Yasui; Melinda L Irwin; Kumar B Rajan; Bess Sorensen; Rebecca E Rudolph; Deborah Bowen; Frank Z Stanczyk; John D Potter; Robert S Schwartz Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-04-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: R R Pate; M Pratt; S N Blair; W L Haskell; C A Macera; C Bouchard; D Buchner; W Ettinger; G W Heath; A C King Journal: JAMA Date: 1995-02-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Melinda L Irwin; Anne McTiernan; Leslie Bernstein; Frank D Gilliland; Richard Baumgartner; Kathy Baumgartner; Rachel Ballard-Barbash Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Anne McTiernan; Kumar B Rajan; Shelley S Tworoger; Melinda Irwin; Leslie Bernstein; Richard Baumgartner; Frank Gilliland; Frank Z Stanczyk; Yutaka Yasui; Rachel Ballard-Barbash Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Melinda L Irwin; Yutaka Yasui; Cornelia M Ulrich; Deborah Bowen; Rebecca E Rudolph; Robert S Schwartz; Michi Yukawa; Erin Aiello; John D Potter; Anne McTiernan Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-01-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Melinda L Irwin; Diane Crumley; Anne McTiernan; Leslie Bernstein; Richard Baumgartner; Frank D Gilliland; Andrea Kriska; Rachel Ballard-Barbash Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-04-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Shannon M Conroy; Lesley M Butler; Danielle Harvey; Ellen B Gold; Barbara Sternfeld; Nina Oestreicher; Gail A Greendale; Laurel A Habel Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Catherine Klifa; Adriana Pérez; Andrea M Kriska; Robin R High; Linda Snetselaar; Joanne F Dorgan Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Christine M Friedenreich; Kerry S Courneya; Sameer M Siddiqi; Anne McTiernan; Catherine M Alfano Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Thang Trinh; Mikael Eriksson; Hatef Darabi; Stephanie E Bonn; Judith S Brand; Jack Cuzick; Kamila Czene; Arvid Sjölander; Katarina Bälter; Per Hall Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Theresa H M Keegan; Salma Shariff-Marco; Meera Sangaramoorthy; Jocelyn Koo; Andrew Hertz; Clayton W Schupp; Juan Yang; Esther M John; Scarlett L Gomez Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 2.532