Literature DB >> 20350749

Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy for men with high Gleason sum in pathologic specimen.

Phillip M Pierorazio1, Thomas J Guzzo, Misop Han, Trinity J Bivalacqua, Jonathan I Epstein, Edward M Schaeffer, Mark Schoenberg, Patrick C Walsh, Alan W Partin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with high Gleason sum 8-10 at radical prostatectomy (RP) and to identify the predictors of prostate cancer-specific survival (CSS) in this cohort.
METHODS: The institutional RP database was queried. A total of 9381 patients with complete follow-up underwent RP from 1982 to 2008. Of these 9381 patients, 1061 had pathologic Gleason sum 8-10 cancer. The patient and prostate cancer characteristics were evaluated. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate proportional hazard regression models were created to evaluate the pertinent predictors of CSS (death from, or attributed to, prostate cancer).
RESULTS: The median preoperative prostate-specific antigen level was 7.6 ng/mL; 435 men had clinical Stage T1 tumor, 568 had Stage T2, and 36 had Stage T3. The biopsy Gleason sum was <7, 7, and >7 in 244 (22.3%), 406 (37.2%), and 425 (38.9%) patients, respectively. The median follow-up was 5 years (range 1-23). The actuarial 15-year recurrence-free survival, CSS, and overall survival rate was 20.7%, 57.4%, and 45.4%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the predictors of poor CSS were pathologic Gleason sum 9-10 and seminal vesicle and lymph node involvement. Patients with pathologic Gleason sum 8 and organ-confined disease had a CSS rate of 89.9% at 15 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that 80% of the men with Gleason sum 8-10 who undergo RP will have experienced biochemical recurrence by 15 years. However, the CSS rate approached 90% for men with pathologic organ-confined disease. Higher pathologic Gleason sum 9-10 and seminal vesicle and lymph node involvement were independent predictors of worse CSS.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20350749      PMCID: PMC2897964          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  25 in total

1.  Role of radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer of high Gleason score.

Authors:  M V Tefilli; E L Gheiler; R Tiguert; M Banerjee; W Sakr; D Grignon; D P Wood; J E Pontes
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 4.104

2.  A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M W Kattan; J A Eastham; A M Stapleton; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Results of radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  G S Gerber; R A Thisted; P T Scardino; H G Frohmuller; F H Schroeder; D F Paulson; A W Middleton; D B Rukstalis; J A Smith; P F Schellhammer; M Ohori; G W Chodak
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-08-28       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The result of radical retropubic prostatectomy and adjuvant therapy for pathologic stage C prostate cancer.

Authors:  S E Schild; W W Wong; G L Grado; M Y Halyard; D E Novicki; S K Swanson; T R Larson; R G Ferrigni
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Improved survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy and goserelin.

Authors:  M Bolla; D Gonzalez; P Warde; J B Dubois; R O Mirimanoff; G Storme; J Bernier; A Kuten; C Sternberg; T Gil; L Collette; M Pierart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-07-31       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M W Kattan; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Initial hormonal management of androgen-sensitive metastatic, recurrent, or progressive prostate cancer: 2006 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline.

Authors:  D Andrew Loblaw; Katherine S Virgo; Robert Nam; Mark R Somerfield; Edgar Ben-Josef; David S Mendelson; Richard Middleton; Stewart A Sharp; Thomas J Smith; James Talcott; Maryellen Taplin; Nicholas J Vogelzang; James L Wade; Charles L Bennett; Howard I Scher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Clinical and pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with a preoperative Gleason sum of 8 to 10.

Authors:  Patrick J Bastian; Mark L Gonzalgo; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Joseph C Presti; Leslie A Mangold; Elizabeth Humphreys; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Prostate-specific antigen after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Patterns of recurrence and cancer control.

Authors:  C R Pound; A W Partin; J I Epstein; P C Walsh
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.241

10.  Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; D Schultz; K Blank; G A Broderick; J E Tomaszewski; A A Renshaw; I Kaplan; C J Beard; A Wein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  16 in total

1.  Evolution of the clinical presentation of men undergoing radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Ashley E Ross; Misop Han; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Characteristics of modern Gleason 9/10 prostate adenocarcinoma: a single tertiary centre experience within the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  F O'Kelly; S Elamin; A Cahill; P Aherne; J White; J Buckley; K N O'Regan; A Brady; D G Power; M F O'Brien; P Sweeney; N Mayer; P J Kelly
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Preoperative characteristics of high-Gleason disease predictive of favourable pathological and clinical outcomes at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Ashley E Ross; Brian M Lin; Jonathan I Epstein; Misop Han; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin; Christian P Pavlovich; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Matched comparison of outcomes following open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk patients.

Authors:  Jonas Busch; Ahmed Magheli; Natalia Leva; Stefan Hinz; Michelle Ferrari; Frank Friedersdorff; Tom Florian Fuller; Kurt Miller; Mark L Gonzalgo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Prostate-specific antigen density predicts extracapsular extension and increased risk of biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Takuya Koie; Koji Mitsuzuka; Takahiro Yoneyama; Shintaro Narita; Sadafumi Kawamura; Yasuhiro Kaiho; Norihiko Tsuchiya; Tatsuo Tochigi; Tomonori Habuchi; Yoichi Arai; Chikara Ohyama; Tohru Yoneyama; Yuki Tobisawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Surgery vs Radiotherapy in the Management of Biopsy Gleason Score 9-10 Prostate Cancer and the Risk of Mortality.

Authors:  Derya Tilki; Ming-Hui Chen; Jing Wu; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen; Michelle Braccioforte; Brian J Moran; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  Contemporaneous comparison of open vs minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Jeffrey K Mullins; John B Eifler; Kipp Voth; Elias S Hyams; Misop Han; Christian P Pavlovich; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Alan W Partin; Mohamad E Allaf; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Secreted protein, acidic and rich in cysteine-like 1 (SPARCL1) is down regulated in aggressive prostate cancers and is prognostic for poor clinical outcome.

Authors:  Paula J Hurley; Luigi Marchionni; Brian W Simons; Ashley E Ross; Sarah B Peskoe; Rebecca M Miller; Nicholas Erho; Ismael A Vergara; Mercedeh Ghadessi; Zhenhua Huang; Bora Gurel; Ben Ho Park; Elai Davicioni; Robert B Jenkins; Elizabeth A Platz; David M Berman; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The Significance of Accurate Determination of Gleason Score for Therapeutic Options and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Burkhard Helpap; Daniel Ringli; Jens Tonhauser; Immanuel Poser; Jürgen Breul; Heidrun Gevensleben; Hans-Helge Seifert
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.201

10.  Notch3 is activated by chronic hypoxia and contributes to the progression of human prostate cancer.

Authors:  Giovanna Danza; Claudia Di Serio; Maria Raffaella Ambrosio; Niccolò Sturli; Giuseppe Lonetto; Fabiana Rosati; Bruno Jim Rocca; Giuseppina Ventimiglia; Maria Teresa del Vecchio; Igor Prudovsky; Niccolò Marchionni; Francesca Tarantini
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 7.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.