Literature DB >> 16900523

Clinical and pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with a preoperative Gleason sum of 8 to 10.

Patrick J Bastian1, Mark L Gonzalgo, William J Aronson, Martha K Terris, Christopher J Kane, Christopher L Amling, Joseph C Presti, Leslie A Mangold, Elizabeth Humphreys, Jonathan I Epstein, Alan W Partin, Stephen J Freedland.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Men with a biopsy Gleason sum of 8 to 10 are considered high-risk. The current study sought to identify whether there was a subset of men with high biopsy Gleason sums who would have a good pathologic and biochemical outcome with surgical monotherapy. To increase the generalizability of the findings, data were used from patients treated at 2 very different practice settings: a tertiary care referral center (Johns Hopkins Hospital) and multiple equal-access medical centers (Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital [SEARCH] Database).
METHODS: The data were retrospectively reviewed from men with biopsy Gleason sums 8 to 10 treated by radical prostatectomy at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (n = 220, 3.8% of total cohort) and within the SEARCH Database (n = 149, 7.7% of total cohort). The preoperative clinical characteristics predicting unfavorable pathologic disease (nonorgan-confined and/or positive surgical margins) and time to biochemical recurrence were determined using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards analysis, respectively.
RESULTS: Favorable pathologic outcome (organ-confined and negative surgical margins) was observed in 21% of the men in the Johns Hopkins cohort and 41% from the SEARCH cohort. On multivariate analysis, higher serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was the only variable that significantly predicted an unfavorable pathologic outcome from both the Johns Hopkins (P = .047) and SEARCH cohorts (P = .002). The 5-year and 10-year estimated biochemical-free survival rates in the Johns Hopkins cohort were 40% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33-48%) and 27% (95% CI, 18-36%), respectively, and 32% (95% CI, 22-42%) and 28% (95% CI, 18-38%) in the SEARCH cohort, respectively. Among men with favorable pathologic findings, the 5- and 10-year estimated biochemical-free survival rates in the Johns Hopkins cohort were 79% (95% CI, 62-89%) and 50% (95% CI, 25-71%), respectively, and 49% (95% CI, 32-65%) and 49% (95% CI, 32-65%) in the SEARCH cohort, respectively. No single preoperative variable significantly predicted the risk of biochemical progression in both the SEARCH or Johns Hopkins cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of men with a biopsy Gleason sum of >or=8, regardless of where the patient is treated, had unfavorable pathologic disease and experienced a biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy. Even among men with organ-confined disease and negative surgical margins or pathologic Gleason sum <8, at least half of the men experienced a PSA recurrence. Patients with biopsy Gleason sum 8 to 10 cancers are good candidates for multimodal therapy. Whereas multimodal therapy has often meant radiation plus hormonal therapy, newer possibilities for multimodal therapy exist such as surgery with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemohormonal therapy or surgery with adjuvant radiation. (c) 2006 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16900523     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  25 in total

Review 1.  Radical prostatectomy as primary treatment of high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alexandre Ingels; Alexandre de la Taille; Guillaume Ploussard
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  What is appropriate neoadjuvant/adjuvant androgen deprivation for high-risk/locally advanced prostate cancer?

Authors:  Mikio Namiki; Hiroyuki Konaka
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 3.  Effectiveness and adverse effects of hormonal therapy for prostate cancer: Japanese experience and perspective.

Authors:  Mikio Namiki; Satoru Ueno; Yasuhide Kitagawa; Takashi Fukagai; Hideyuki Akaza
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Preoperative characteristics of high-Gleason disease predictive of favourable pathological and clinical outcomes at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Ashley E Ross; Brian M Lin; Jonathan I Epstein; Misop Han; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin; Christian P Pavlovich; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 5.  The status of surgery in the management of high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christian Bach; Sailaja Pisipati; Datesh Daneshwar; Mark Wright; Edward Rowe; David Gillatt; Raj Persad; Anthony Koupparis
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Impact of stage migration and practice changes on high-risk prostate cancer: results from patients treated with radical prostatectomy over the last two decades.

Authors:  Nicola Fossati; Niccolò M Passoni; Marco Moschini; Giorgio Gandaglia; Alessandro Larcher; Massimo Freschi; Giorgio Guazzoni; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy for men with high Gleason sum in pathologic specimen.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Thomas J Guzzo; Misop Han; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Jonathan I Epstein; Edward M Schaeffer; Mark Schoenberg; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  The role of surgery in high risk and advanced prostate cancer: A narrative review.

Authors:  Chloe Sheila Dayan Roy; Ashwin Sachdeva; Gokul Vignesh Kandaswamy; Bhavan Prasad Rai
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-10-30

9.  What are the outcomes of radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer?

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Edward M Schaeffer; Bruce J Trock; Jonathan I Epstein; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Evaluation of clinical staging of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (eighth edition) for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wen-Jun Xiao; Yu Zhu; Yao Zhu; Bo Dai; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.