Literature DB >> 22373045

Preoperative characteristics of high-Gleason disease predictive of favourable pathological and clinical outcomes at radical prostatectomy.

Phillip M Pierorazio1, Ashley E Ross, Brian M Lin, Jonathan I Epstein, Misop Han, Patrick C Walsh, Alan W Partin, Christian P Pavlovich, Edward M Schaeffer.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Men with high-risk prostate cancer experience recurrence, metastases and death at the highest rate in the prostate cancer population. Pathological stage at radical prostatectomy (RP) is the greatest predictor of recurrence and mortality in men with high-grade disease. Preoperative models predicting outcome after RP are skewed by the large proportion of men with low- and intermediate-risk features; there is a paucity of data about preoperative criteria to identify men with high-grade cancer who may benefit from RP. The present study adds comprehensive biopsy data from a large cohort of men with high-grade prostate cancer at biopsy. By adding biopsy parameters, e.g. number of high-grade cores and >50% involvement of any core, to traditional predictors of outcome (prostate-specific antigen concentration, clinical stage and Gleason sum), we can better inform men who present with high-grade prostate cancer as to their risk of favourable or unfavourable disease at RP.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate preoperative characteristics that distinguish favourable and unfavourable pathological and clinical outcomes in men with high biopsy Gleason sum (8-10) prostate cancer to better select men who will most benefit from radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Institutional Review Board-approved institutional RP database (1982-2010) was analysed for men with high-Gleason prostate cancer on biopsy; 842 men were identified. The 10-year biochemical-free (BFS), metastasis-free (MFS) and prostate cancer-specific survival (CSS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method to verify favourable pathology as men with Gleason <8 at RP or ≤ pT3a compared with men with unfavourable pathology with Gleason 8-10 and pT3b or N1. Preoperative characteristics were compared using appropriate comparative tests. Logistic regression determined preoperative predictors of unfavourable pathology.
RESULTS: There was favourable pathology in 656 (77.9%) men. The 10-year BFS, MFS and CSS were 31.0%, 60.9% and 74.8%, respectively. In contrast, men with unfavourable pathological findings had significantly worse 10-year BFS, MFS and CSS, at 4.3%, 29.1% and 52.3%, respectively (all P < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration of >10 ng/mL (odds ratio [OR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-3.62, P = 0.001), advanced clinical stage (≥ cT2b; OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.55-4.21, P < 0.001), Gleason pattern 9 or 10 at biopsy (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.59-4.09, P < 0.001), increasing number of cores positive with high-grade cancer (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.34, P = 0.04) and >50% positive core involvement (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.17-4.35, P = 0.015) were predictive of unfavourable pathology.
CONCLUSIONS: Men with high-Gleason sum at biopsy are at high risk for biochemical recurrence, metastasis and death after RP; men with high Gleason sum and advanced pathological stage (pT3b or N1) have the worst prognosis. Among men with high-Gleason sum at biopsy, a PSA concentration of >10 ng/mL, clinical stage ≥ T2b, Gleason pattern 9 or 10, increasing number of cores with high-grade cancer and >50% core involvement are predictive of unfavourable pathology.
© 2012 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2012 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22373045      PMCID: PMC4124597          DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10986.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  26 in total

1.  Predicting recurrence after radical prostatectomy for patients with high risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gary D Grossfeld; David M Latini; Deborah P Lubeck; Shilpa S Mehta; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  M Han; A W Partin; C R Pound; J I Epstein; P C Walsh
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.241

3.  Metastasis after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a comparison of clinical cohorts adjusted for case mix.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; James A Eastham; Angel M Cronin; Zvi Fuks; Zhigang Zhang; Yoshiya Yamada; Andrew Vickers; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Identification of patients with prostate cancer who benefit from immediate postoperative radiotherapy: EORTC 22911.

Authors:  Theodorus H Van der Kwast; Michel Bolla; Hein Van Poppel; Paul Van Cangh; Kris Vekemans; Luigi Da Pozzo; Jean-Francois Bosset; Karl H Kurth; Fritz H Schröder; Laurence Collette
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Cognitive effects of hormone therapy in men with prostate cancer: a review.

Authors:  Christian J Nelson; Jennifer S Lee; Maria C Gamboa; Andrew J Roth
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Bruce J Trock; Misop Han; Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Theodore L DeWeese; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  What are the outcomes of radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer?

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Edward M Schaeffer; Bruce J Trock; Jonathan I Epstein; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Percentage of tumor in prostatectomy specimens: a study of American Veterans.

Authors:  Robin T Vollmer
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  Phase III postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy compared with radical prostatectomy alone in pT3 prostate cancer with postoperative undetectable prostate-specific antigen: ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95.

Authors:  Thomas Wiegel; Dirk Bottke; Ursula Steiner; Alessandra Siegmann; Reinhard Golz; Stephan Störkel; Norman Willich; Axel Semjonow; Rainer Souchon; Michael Stöckle; Christian Rübe; Lothar Weissbach; Peter Althaus; Udo Rebmann; Tilman Kälble; Horst Jürgen Feldmann; Manfred Wirth; Axel Hinke; Wolfgang Hinkelbein; Kurt Miller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Intermittent androgen deprivation for locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer: results from a randomised phase 3 study of the South European Uroncological Group.

Authors:  Fernando E C Calais da Silva; Aldo V Bono; Peter Whelan; Maurizio Brausi; Anton Marques Queimadelos; Jose A Portillo Martin; Ziya Kirkali; Fernando M V Calais da Silva; Chris Robertson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Artificial neural networks and prostate cancer--tools for diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Xinhai Hu; Henning Cammann; Hellmuth-A Meyer; Kurt Miller; Klaus Jung; Carsten Stephan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  An audit of referral and treatment patterns of high-risk prostate cancer patients in Alberta.

Authors:  Majed Alghamdi; Amandeep Taggar; Derek Tilley; Marc Kerba; Xanthoula Kostaras; Geoffrey Gotto; Michael Sia
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Management of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after local therapy: evolving standards of care and new directions.

Authors:  Channing J Paller; Emmanuel S Antonarakis
Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-01

4.  Contemporaneous comparison of open vs minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Jeffrey K Mullins; John B Eifler; Kipp Voth; Elias S Hyams; Misop Han; Christian P Pavlovich; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Alan W Partin; Mohamad E Allaf; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Secreted protein, acidic and rich in cysteine-like 1 (SPARCL1) is down regulated in aggressive prostate cancers and is prognostic for poor clinical outcome.

Authors:  Paula J Hurley; Luigi Marchionni; Brian W Simons; Ashley E Ross; Sarah B Peskoe; Rebecca M Miller; Nicholas Erho; Ismael A Vergara; Mercedeh Ghadessi; Zhenhua Huang; Bora Gurel; Ben Ho Park; Elai Davicioni; Robert B Jenkins; Elizabeth A Platz; David M Berman; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Should all prostate needle biopsy Gleason score 4 + 4 = 8 prostate cancers be high risk? Implications for shared decision-making and patient counselling.

Authors:  Kevin Ginsburg; Adam I Cole; Michael E Silverman; Joan Livingstone; Daryn W Smith; Lance K Heilbrun; Dongping Shi; Rohit Mehra; Wael A Sakr; Todd M Morgan; Michael L Cher
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  Increased incidence of pathologically nonorgan confined prostate cancer in African-American men eligible for active surveillance.

Authors:  Yun-Sok Ha; Amirali Salmasi; Michael Karellas; Eric A Singer; Jeong Hyun Kim; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; Wun-Jae Kim; Dong Hyeon Lee; Isaac Yi Kim
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Patients treated with radical prostatectomy with positive digital rectal examination findings in the intermediate-risk group are prone to PSA recurrence.

Authors:  Nobuki Furubayashi; Takahito Negishi; Shintaro Ura; Jun Mutaguchi; Kenichi Taguchi; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Motonobu Nakamura
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Nuclear MTA1 overexpression is associated with aggressive prostate cancer, recurrence and metastasis in African Americans.

Authors:  Steven J Dias; Xinchun Zhou; Marina Ivanovic; Michael P Gailey; Swati Dhar; Liangfen Zhang; Zhi He; Alan D Penman; Srinivasan Vijayakumar; Anait S Levenson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Optimizing the management of high-risk, localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Debasish Sundi; Byong Chang Jeong; Seung Bae Lee; Misop Han
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.