Literature DB >> 10221268

Role of radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer of high Gleason score.

M V Tefilli1, E L Gheiler, R Tiguert, M Banerjee, W Sakr, D Grignon, D P Wood, J E Pontes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The routine use of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing combined with digital rectal examination has lowered tumor volume and clinical-pathological stage of men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Therefore, we may identify more men with poorly differentiated tumors of early clinical stage. In order to identify those who may benefit from radical prostatectomy, we evaluated known prognostic variables in patients with prostate cancer of high Gleason score (8-10).
METHODS: Of 652 patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy as monotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer between March 1991-December 1995, 84 patients with prostatectomy specimen Gleason score 8-10 tumors were identified. Clinical-pathological data were obtained from our prostate cancer database. Gleason score, PSA level, margin status, pathologic stage, and tumor volume were analyzed as general prognostic variables for disease-free survival (DFS). Follow-up ranged from 13-84 months (median, 36.2). Biochemical recurrence was defined as a postoperative PSA elevation greater than 0.4 ng/ml.
RESULTS: The DFS for patients with Gleason score 8-10 and pathologically organ-confined disease was 62.5%. DFS was 56.2% for patients with PSA < or =10 ng/ml, compared to 19.2% for patients with serum PSA >10 ng/ml (P = 0.009). Patients with nonspecimen-confined disease (positive margins) had a DFS rate of 26.6% vs. 55% for patients with specimen-confined disease (negative margins) (P = 0.009). On multivariable analysis, only preoperative PSA < or =10 ng/ml (P = 0.02) and surgical margin status (P = 0.04) were significant predictors of DFS.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical margin status and preoperative serum PSA level are independent predictors of DFS for patients with high Gleason score prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy as monotherapy. Patients with poorly differentiated prostate cancer treated surgically at an early stage can have a favorable prognosis, especially if negative surgical margins are obtained. A preoperative serum PSA level < or =10 ng/ml carries the greatest likelihood of achieving prolonged DFS in this group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10221268     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0045(19990401)39:1<60::aid-pros10>3.0.co;2-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  5 in total

1.  Do tumor volume, percent tumor volume predict biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yang Meng; He Li; Peng Xu; Jia Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-12-15

2.  Poorly differentiated prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: long-term outcome and incidence of pathological downgrading.

Authors:  John F Donohue; Fernando J Bianco; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Andrew J Vickers; Thomas M Wheeler; Peter T Scardino; Victor A Reuter; James A Eastham
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy for men with high Gleason sum in pathologic specimen.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Thomas J Guzzo; Misop Han; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Jonathan I Epstein; Edward M Schaeffer; Mark Schoenberg; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  Radical Prostatectomy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancers-Review of Literature.

Authors:  N Srivatsa; H Nagaraja; S Shweta; S K Raghunath
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-05

Review 5.  Locally advanced and high risk prostate cancer: The best indication for initial radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Hendrik van Poppel
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2015-04-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.