Literature DB >> 2035000

Reproducibility of nine tests to measure spinal mobility and trunk muscle strength.

K Hyytiäinen1, J J Salminen, T Suvitie, G Wickström, J Pentti.   

Abstract

The reproducibility of nine back function tests suitable for use in the occupational health service was determined in 30 male employees. The correlation of three tests made with a tape measure--forward bending, modified Schober, and side bending--was high in both intra- and inter-observer comparisons (r = 0.82-0.96). Immediate repetition of the testing procedure improved the performance in the forward and side bending tests. The reproducibility was also good for the tests of dynamic (K = 0.57-0.78) and endurance (r = 0.90-0.96) strength of the abdominal muscles and quite good for the test of endurance strength of the back muscles (r = 0.74-0.80). The differences between the examiners must be taken into account in the modified Schober test, and in testing the flexibility of the hip flexors and hamstrings and the endurance strength of the back muscles.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2035000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med        ISSN: 0036-5505


  12 in total

1.  No difference in 9-year outcome in CLBP patients randomized to lumbar fusion versus cognitive intervention and exercises.

Authors:  Anne Froholdt; Olav Reikeraas; Inger Holm; Anne Keller; Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Marcus Richter; Wolfhart Puhl; René Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The role of back muscle endurance, maximum force, balance and trunk rotation control regarding lifting capacity.

Authors:  Peter Schenk; Andreas Klipstein; Susanne Spillmann; Jesper Strøyer; Thomas Laubli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Effects of back posture education on elementary schoolchildren's back function.

Authors:  Elisabeth Geldhof; Greet Cardon; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Lieven Danneels; Pascal Coorevits; Guy Vanderstraeten; Dirk De Clercq
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Time-course changes associated with PA lumbar mobilizations on lumbar and hamstring range of motion: a randomized controlled crossover trial.

Authors:  Paul Chesterton; William Evans; Nick Livadas; Shaun J McLaren
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-11-13

6.  Effectiveness of massage therapy for subacute low-back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Preyde
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-06-27       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Do MRI findings correlate with mobility tests? An explorative analysis of the test validity with regard to structure.

Authors:  Christoph Quack; Peter Schenk; Thomas Laeubli; Susanne Spillmann; Juerg Hodler; Beat A Michel; Andreas Klipstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Interrater Reliability of Spine Range of Motion Measurement Using a Tape Measure and Goniometer.

Authors:  Madelyn Johnson; M J Mulcahey
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2021-12-09

9.  The reliability of a 10-test package for patients with prolonged back and neck pain: could an examiner without formal medical education be used without loss of quality? A methodological study.

Authors:  Odd Lindell; Lars Eriksson; Lars-Erik Strender
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Screening of the spine in adolescents: inter- and intra-rater reliability and measurement error of commonly used clinical tests.

Authors:  Ellen Aartun; Anna Degerfalk; Linn Kentsdotter; Lise Hestbaek
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.