Literature DB >> 16944227

Effects of back posture education on elementary schoolchildren's back function.

Elisabeth Geldhof1, Greet Cardon, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Lieven Danneels, Pascal Coorevits, Guy Vanderstraeten, Dirk De Clercq.   

Abstract

The possible effects of back education on children's back function were never evaluated. Therefore, main aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of back education in elementary schoolchildren on back function parameters. Since the reliability of back function measurement in children is poorly defined, another objective was to test the selected instruments for reliability in 8-11-year olds. The multi-factorial intervention lasting two school-years consisted of a back education program and the stimulation of postural dynamism in the class. Trunk muscle endurance, leg muscle capacity and spinal curvature were evaluated in a pre-post design including 41 children who received the back education program (mean age at post-test: 11.2 +/- 0.9 years) and 28 controls (mean age at post-test: 11.4 +/- 0.6 years). Besides, test-retest reliability with a 1-week interval was investigated in a separate sample. Therefore, 47 children (mean age: 10.1 +/- 0.5 years) were tested for reliability of trunk muscle endurance and 40 children (mean age: 10.2 +/- 0.7 years) for the assessment of spinal curvatures. Reliability of endurance testing was very good to good for the trunk flexors (ICC = 0.82) and trunk extensors (ICC = 0.63). The assessment of the thoracic (ICC = 0.69) and the lumbar curvature (ICC = 0.52) in seating position showed good to acceptable reliability. Low ICCs were found for the assessment of the thoracic (ICC = 0.39) and the lumbar curvature (ICC = 0.37) in stance. The effects of 2 year back education showed an increase in trunk flexor endurance in the intervention group compared to a decrease in the controls and a trend towards significance for a higher increase in trunk extensor endurance in the intervention group. For leg muscle capacity and spinal curvature no intervention effects were found. The small samples recommend cautious interpretation of intervention effects. However, the present study's findings favor the implementation of back education with focus on postural dynamism in the class as an integral part of the elementary school curriculum in the scope of optimizing spinal loading through the school environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16944227      PMCID: PMC2200723          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0199-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  44 in total

1.  Reliability and validity of the Biodex system 3 pro isokinetic dynamometer velocity, torque and position measurements.

Authors:  Joshua M Drouin; Tamara C Valovich-mcLeod; Sandra J Shultz; Bruce M Gansneder; David H Perrin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Cervical spine ROM measurements: optimizing the testing protocol by using a 3D ultrasound-based motion analysis system.

Authors:  N Strimpakos; V Sakellari; G Gioftsos; M Papathanasiou; E Brountzos; D Kelekis; E Kapreli; J Oldham
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.292

3.  Statistical modelling of fatigue-related electromyographic median frequency characteristics of back and hip muscles during a standardized isometric back extension test.

Authors:  P L M Coorevits; L A Danneels; H Ramon; R Van Audekercke; D C Cambier; G G Vanderstraeten
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.368

4.  Physical activity and four-year development of back strength in children.

Authors:  K Newcomer; M Sinaki; P C Wollan
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 5.  Sitting biomechanics part I: review of the literature.

Authors:  D D Harrison; S O Harrison; A C Croft; D E Harrison; S J Troyanovich
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Measurement of muscle strength of the trunk and the lower extremities in subjects with history of low back pain.

Authors:  J H Lee; Y Ooi; K Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Risk factors for the development of low back pain in adolescence.

Authors:  D E Feldman; I Shrier; M Rossignol; L Abenhaim
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Sitting habits in elementary schoolchildren: a traditional versus a "Moving school".

Authors:  Greet Cardon; Dirk De Clercq; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Dieter Breithecker
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-08

10.  Quantitative Assessment of Lumbar Paraspinal Muscle Endurance.

Authors:  Brian E. Udermann; John M. Mayer; James E. Graves; Steven R. Murray
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.860

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Primary prevention of disc degeneration-related symptoms.

Authors:  Aron Lazary; Zsolt Szövérfi; Julia Szita; Annamária Somhegyi; Michelle Kümin; Peter Paul Varga
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Effects of a postural education program on school backpack habits related to low back pain in children.

Authors:  Josep Vidal; Pere A Borràs; Francisco J Ponseti; Jaume Cantallops; Francisco B Ortega; Pere Palou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The quality of evidence of psychometric properties of three-dimensional spinal posture-measuring instruments.

Authors:  Yolandi Brink; Quinette Louw; Karen Grimmer-Somers
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  The spinal posture of computing adolescents in a real-life setting.

Authors:  Yolandi Brink; Quinette Louw; Karen Grimmer; Esmè Jordaan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  A Meta-Analysis of the Reliability of Four Field-Based Trunk Extension Endurance Tests.

Authors:  María Teresa Martínez-Romero; Francisco Ayala; Mark De Ste Croix; Francisco J Vera-Garcia; Pilar Sainz de Baranda; Fernando Santonja-Medina; Julio Sánchez-Meca
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Comparison of spinal curvature parameters as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and the Cobb method in children with scoliosis.

Authors:  Mária Takács; Zsanett Orlovits; Bence Jáger; Rita M Kiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Preventive physiotherapy interventions for back care in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Inmaculada Calvo-Muñoz; Antonia Gómez-Conesa; Julio Sánchez-Meca
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Development of a cost effective three-dimensional posture analysis tool: validity and reliability.

Authors:  Yolandi Brink; Quinette Louw; Karen Grimmer; Kristiaan Schreve; Gareth van der Westhuizen; Esmè Jordaan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Cluster-randomized, controlled evaluation of a teacher led multi factorial school based back education program for 10 to 12-year old children.

Authors:  Silvia Dullien; Joachim Grifka; Petra Jansen
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Sitting Posture, Sagittal Spinal Curvatures and Back Pain in 8 to 12-Year-Old Children from the Region of Murcia (Spain): ISQUIOS Programme.

Authors:  Pilar Sainz de Baranda; Antonio Cejudo; María Teresa Martínez-Romero; Alba Aparicio-Sarmiento; Olga Rodríguez-Ferrán; Mónica Collazo-Diéguez; José Hurtado-Avilés; Pilar Andújar; Fernando Santonja-Medina
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.