Paul Chesterton1, William Evans2, Nick Livadas1, Shaun J McLaren3,4. 1. a Department of Physiotherapy, Sport Rehabilitation, Dietetics and Leadership , Teesside University , Middlesbrough , UK. 2. b Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing , Sunderland University , UK. 3. c Institute for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure , Leeds Beckett University , Leeds , UK. 4. d The Rugby Football League , Leeds , UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the post-intervention time-course changes in active knee extension (AKE) and active lumbar flexion (ALF) range of motion in response to unilateral posterior-anterior (UPA) mobilizations of the lumbar spine (L4/5 zygapophyseal). METHODS:Twenty-four asymptomatic participants (maleness: 0.58, age [mean ± standard deviation]: 32 ± 8 years, body mass index 25.9 ± 2.6 kg m2) were recruited to a fully controlled crossover trial. Following either the intervention (L4/5 zygapophyseal mobilizations) or control, participants immediately performed the AKE and ALF tests, which were also performed at baseline. Subsequent tests were made at intervals of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 45 and 60 min. RESULTS: After adjustment for baseline (mean AKE: 37.2° from full extension, mean ALF: 14.37 cm), sex and age, UPA lumbar mobilizations had a most likely moderate effect on AKE (9.8° closer to full extension; ±1.9) and a likely moderate effect on ALF (1.34 cm; ±90% confidence limits 0.43). The magnitude of the AKE effect became most likely small 20-min posttreatment (5.3; ±1.7) and possibly small/possibly trivial 60-min posttreatment (2.1; ±1.4). For ALF, the magnitude of the effect became most likely small 15-min posttreatment (0.76; ±0.25), possibly small/possibly trivial 25-min posttreatment (0.38; ±0.18) and likely trivial 60-min posttreatment (0.26; ±1.8). DISCUSSION: UPA lumbar mobilizations increased lumbar Range of Motion and hamstring extensibility by a moderate magnitude, with the effect reducing after 10-20-min posttreatment. Clinicians should consider these time-course changes when applying UPA lumbar mobilizations. Clinical Trials Registry: NCT03273400 Evidence Level: 2b.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the post-intervention time-course changes in active knee extension (AKE) and active lumbar flexion (ALF) range of motion in response to unilateral posterior-anterior (UPA) mobilizations of the lumbar spine (L4/5 zygapophyseal). METHODS: Twenty-four asymptomatic participants (maleness: 0.58, age [mean ± standard deviation]: 32 ± 8 years, body mass index 25.9 ± 2.6 kg m2) were recruited to a fully controlled crossover trial. Following either the intervention (L4/5 zygapophyseal mobilizations) or control, participants immediately performed the AKE and ALF tests, which were also performed at baseline. Subsequent tests were made at intervals of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 45 and 60 min. RESULTS: After adjustment for baseline (mean AKE: 37.2° from full extension, mean ALF: 14.37 cm), sex and age, UPA lumbar mobilizations had a most likely moderate effect on AKE (9.8° closer to full extension; ±1.9) and a likely moderate effect on ALF (1.34 cm; ±90% confidence limits 0.43). The magnitude of the AKE effect became most likely small 20-min posttreatment (5.3; ±1.7) and possibly small/possibly trivial 60-min posttreatment (2.1; ±1.4). For ALF, the magnitude of the effect became most likely small 15-min posttreatment (0.76; ±0.25), possibly small/possibly trivial 25-min posttreatment (0.38; ±0.18) and likely trivial 60-min posttreatment (0.26; ±1.8). DISCUSSION: UPA lumbar mobilizations increased lumbar Range of Motion and hamstring extensibility by a moderate magnitude, with the effect reducing after 10-20-min posttreatment. Clinicians should consider these time-course changes when applying UPA lumbar mobilizations. Clinical Trials Registry: NCT03273400 Evidence Level: 2b.
Authors: Isabelle Boutron; David Moher; Douglas G Altman; Kenneth F Schulz; Philippe Ravaud Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-02-19 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: James W Youdas; David A Krause; John H Hollman; William S Harmsen; Edward Laskowski Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.751