Literature DB >> 22669708

No difference in 9-year outcome in CLBP patients randomized to lumbar fusion versus cognitive intervention and exercises.

Anne Froholdt1, Olav Reikeraas, Inger Holm, Anne Keller, Jens Ivar Brox.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the 9-year outcome in patients with chronic low back pain treated by instrumented lumbar fusion versus cognitive intervention and exercises.
METHODS: The main outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcome measures included pain, fear-avoidance beliefs, trunk muscle strength, medication, and return to work.
RESULTS: One-third of the patients randomized to cognitive intervention and exercises had crossed over and been operated and one-third of the patients allocated to lumbar fusion had been re-operated. The intention-to-treat analysis detected no differences between the two groups. The mean adjusted treatment effect for ODI was 1.9 (95 % CI -7.8 to 11.6). Analysed according to the treatment received, more operated patients used pain medication and were out of work.
CONCLUSIONS: The outcome at 9 years was not different between instrumented lumbar fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22669708      PMCID: PMC3508245          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2382-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  20 in total

1.  Reliability of the isokinetic trunk extensor test, Biering-Sørensen test, and Astrand bicycle test: assessment of intraclass correlation coefficient and critical difference in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy individuals.

Authors:  A Keller; J Hellesnes; J I Brox
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Reliability of isokinetic trunk muscle strength measurement.

Authors:  Gülçin Kaymak Karataş; Feride Göğüş; Jale Meray
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 3.  Failed degenerative lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Ashish D Diwan; Hari Parvartaneni; Frank Cammisa
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  M Grotle; J I Brox; N K Vøllestad
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Re: Brox JI, Sörensen R, Friis A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine. 2003; 28:1913-1921.

Authors:  Olle Hägg; Peter Fritzell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Long-term outcomes of lumbar fusion among workers' compensation subjects: a historical cohort study.

Authors:  Trang H Nguyen; David C Randolph; James Talmage; Paul Succop; Russell Travis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group.

Authors:  P Fritzell; O Hägg; P Wessberg; A Nordwall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Margreth Grotle; Jens Ivar Brox; Nina Køppke Vøllestad
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration.

Authors:  Jens Ivar Brox; Roger Sørensen; Astrid Friis; Øystein Nygaard; Aage Indahl; Anne Keller; Tor Ingebrigtsen; Hege R Eriksen; Inger Holm; Anne Kathrine Koller; Rolf Riise; Olav Reikerås
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Measuring self-reported functional status and pain in patients with chronic low back pain by postal questionnaires: a reliability study.

Authors:  Inger Holm; Astrid Friis; Kjersti Storheim; Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  9 in total

1.  Five-year follow-up of total disc replacement compared to fusion: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Caroline Sköld; Hans Tropp; Svante Berg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2012.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal 2012.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  New horizons in neuromodulation.

Authors:  Michael Gofeld
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-03

Review 5.  Chronic low back pain: pharmacological, interventional and surgical strategies.

Authors:  Bart Morlion
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 42.937

6.  Chiropractic Distraction Spinal Manipulation on Postsurgical Continued Low Back and Radicular Pain Patients: A Retrospective Case Series.

Authors:  Maruti R Gudavalli; Kurt Olding; George Joachim; James M Cox
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-05-25

Review 7.  What can we learn from long-term studies on chronic low back pain? A scoping review.

Authors:  Alisa L Dutmer; Remko Soer; André P Wolff; Michiel F Reneman; Maarten H Coppes; Henrica R Schiphorst Preuper
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Jenna Ellis; Rachel Ogilvie; Antti Malmivaara; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-28

Review 9.  A systematic literature review of time to return to work and narcotic use after lumbar spinal fusion using minimal invasive and open surgery techniques.

Authors:  Xuan Wang; Benny Borgman; Simona Vertuani; Jonas Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.