| Literature DB >> 20336024 |
Jin-Jie Li1, Xiao-Ya Shang, Ling-Ling Li, Ming-Tao Liu, Jian-Quan Zheng, Zong-Lian Jin.
Abstract
Using a cell-based cytotoxicity assay three new cytotoxic azaphilones, including two stereoisomers and designated monapurones A-C (1-3), were isolated from the extract of Monascus purpureus-fermented rice (red yeast rice). Their structures were elucidated by detailed interpretation of spectroscopic and chemical data. The relative configurations were assigned on the basis of analysis of NOE data, and the absolute configurations were determined by direct comparison of their CD spectra with those of known azaphilones and chemical correlations. In the in vitro assays, monapurones A-C (1-3) showed selective cytotoxicity against human cancer cell line A549 with IC50 values of 3.8, 2.8 and 2.4 microM respectively, while exhibiting no significant toxicity to normal MRC-5 and WI-38 cells at the same concentration.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20336024 PMCID: PMC6257306 DOI: 10.3390/molecules15031958
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structures of compounds 1, 2 and 3.
1H-NMR data forcompounds 1-3.
| No. | 1a
| 1b
| 2a
| 3a
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.35 (br s) | 7.37 (brs) | 7.04 (br s) | 7.09 (br s) |
| 4 | 5.95 (br s) | 6.23 (brs) | 5.91 (br s) | 5.90 (br s) |
| 5 | 5.37 ( br s ) | 5.34 (d. 1.2) | 5.37 (br s) | 5.34 (br s) |
| 8 | 3.37 (dd, 3.0, 10.0) | 3.31 (dd, 3.6, 10.2) | 2.92 (t, 10.0) | 3.30 (t, 10.0) |
| 9 | 1.28 (s) | 1.21 (s) | 1.31 (s) | 1.36 (s) |
| 10 | 5.94 (dd, 1.5, 15.5) | 6.14 (dd, 1.8 15.6) | 5.95 (dd, 1.5, 15.5) | 5.93 (dd, 1.5, 15.5) |
| 11 | 6.49 (dq, 7.0, 15.5) | 6.50 (dq, 7.2, 15.6) | 6.41 (dq, 7.0, 15.5) | 6.43 (dq, 7.0, 15.5) |
| 12 | 1.89 (dd, 1.0, 6.5) | 1.88 (dd, 1.8, 6.6) | 1.87 (dd, 1.0, 6.5) | 1.86 (dd, 1.0, 6.5) |
| 13α | 2.33(dd, 10.0, 18.0) | 2.39 (dd, 10.2, 17.4) | 1.96 (dd, 10.5, 13.0) | 1.93 (overlap) |
| 13β | 2.99 (dd, 3.0, 18.0) | 2.99 (dd, 3.6, 17.4 ) | 2.36 (dd, 10.5, 13.0) | 1.98 (overlap) |
| 15a | 2.22 (dt, 7.5, 18.0) | 2.32 (dt, 7.5, 18.0) | 1.58 (m) | 1.45 (m) |
| 15b | 2.34 (dt, 7.5, 18.0) | 2.39 (dt, 7.5, 18.0) | 1.84 (m) | 2.00 (overlap) |
| 16 | 1.49 (m) | 1.48 (m) | 1.29 (m) | 1.23 (m) |
| 17 | 1.24 (m) | 1.19 (m) | 1.29 (m) | 1.23 (m) |
| 18 | 1.18 (m) | 1.28 (m) | 1.29 (m) | 1.23 (m) |
| 19 | 0.84 (t, 7.5) | 0.84 (t, 7.8) | 0.87 (t, 7.5) | 0.82 (t, 7.5) |
| OH-7 | 4.17 (br s) | 4.17 (br s) | ||
| OCH3 | 3.16 (s) | 3.29 (s) |
a Data were recorded in CDCl3 at 500 MHz; b Data were recorded in CD3COCD3 at 600 MHz. The assignments were based on DEPT, 1H-1H COSY, HMQC and HMBC experiments.
13C-NMR data forcompounds 1-3.
| No. | 1
| 2
| 3
| No. | 1
| 2
| 3
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 146.0 ( d ) | 143.4 ( d ) | 144.1 ( d ) | 11 | 134.3 ( d ) | 133.1 ( d ) | 133.6 ( d ) |
| 3 | 155.5 ( s ) | 154.7 ( s ) | 155.1 ( s ) | 12 | 18.4 ( q ) | 18.4 ( q ) | 18.4 ( q ) |
| 4 | 106.9 ( d ) | 108.2 ( d ) | 107.6 ( d ) | 13 | 40.4 ( t ) | 44.8 ( t ) | 43.3 ( t ) |
| 4a | 145.8 ( s ) | 142.9 ( s ) | 143.6 ( s ) | 14 | 209.8 ( s ) | 108.0 ( s ) | 107.0 ( s ) |
| 5 | 103.7 ( d ) | 107.0 ( d ) | 106.7 ( d ) | 15 | 43.5 ( t ) | 34.9 ( t ) | 34.3 ( t ) |
| 6 | 198.3 ( s ) | 196.2 ( s ) | 196.8 ( s ) | 16 | 23.4 ( t ) | 24.1 ( t ) | 24.7 ( t ) |
| 7 | 73.1 ( s ) | 82.7 ( s ) | 83.6 ( s ) | 17 | 22.4 ( t ) | 24.0 ( t ) | 24.1 ( t ) |
| 8 | 40.5 ( d ) | 44.8 ( d ) | 43.5 ( d ) | 18 | 31.3 ( t ) | 31.9 ( t ) | 31.8 ( t ) |
| 8a | 120.1 ( s ) | 118.1 ( s ) | 117.2 ( s ) | 19 | 13.9 ( q ) | 14.0 ( q ) | 13.9 ( q ) |
| 9 | 26.8 ( q ) | 22.5 ( q ) | 22.4 ( q ) | OCH3 | 48.5 | 48.3 | |
| 10 | 123.1 ( d ) | 123.3 ( d ) | 123.2 ( d ) |
13C-NMR data were measured in CDCl3 at 125 MHz. The assignments were based on DEPT, 1H-1H COSY, HMQC and HMBC experiments.
Figure 2Main 1H-1H COSY (bold lines) and HMBC (arrows) correlations of compounds 1 and 2.
Figure 3Key NOESY correlations of compounds 1-3.