OBJECTIVE: To detail the principles of using model-based determination of regional myocardial blood flow (MBF) by computed tomography (CT) and demonstrate its in vivo applicability. METHODS: Dual-source CT was performed with a dynamic protocol comprising acquisition with alternating table positions in ECG-triggered end-systolic timing every second for 30 s. The results of two reconstructions were merged into one final image stack (coverage 73 mm), with low spatial frequency components from a 360 degrees reconstruction and high spatial frequency components from a dual-source cardiac partial image reconstruction. A parametric deconvolution technique was used to fit the time-attenuation curves (TAC), the maximum slope of which was used to derive MBF. RESULTS: One study participant underwent dynamic myocardial stress perfusion imaging (9.6 mSv) followed by invasive coronary angiography and measurement of fractional flow reserve as the gold standard. MBF was 159 ml/100 ml/min in the non-ischaemic anterolateral and 86 ml/100 ml/min in the inferoseptal ischaemic wall. CONCLUSION: This first evaluation indicates that mathematical modelling of voxel TACs can potentially be used to quantify differences in MBF in a clinical setting. If confirmed in feasibility studies, cardiac CT may allow for parallel assessment of morphology and haemodynamic relevance of coronary artery disease.
OBJECTIVE: To detail the principles of using model-based determination of regional myocardial blood flow (MBF) by computed tomography (CT) and demonstrate its in vivo applicability. METHODS: Dual-source CT was performed with a dynamic protocol comprising acquisition with alternating table positions in ECG-triggered end-systolic timing every second for 30 s. The results of two reconstructions were merged into one final image stack (coverage 73 mm), with low spatial frequency components from a 360 degrees reconstruction and high spatial frequency components from a dual-source cardiac partial image reconstruction. A parametric deconvolution technique was used to fit the time-attenuation curves (TAC), the maximum slope of which was used to derive MBF. RESULTS: One study participant underwent dynamic myocardial stress perfusion imaging (9.6 mSv) followed by invasive coronary angiography and measurement of fractional flow reserve as the gold standard. MBF was 159 ml/100 ml/min in the non-ischaemic anterolateral and 86 ml/100 ml/min in the inferoseptal ischaemic wall. CONCLUSION: This first evaluation indicates that mathematical modelling of voxel TACs can potentially be used to quantify differences in MBF in a clinical setting. If confirmed in feasibility studies, cardiac CT may allow for parallel assessment of morphology and haemodynamic relevance of coronary artery disease.
Authors: Matthew J Budoff; Stephan Achenbach; Roger S Blumenthal; J Jeffrey Carr; Jonathan G Goldin; Philip Greenland; Alan D Guerci; Joao A C Lima; Daniel J Rader; Geoffrey D Rubin; Leslee J Shaw; Susan E Wiegers Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-10-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Elena Daghini; Andrew N Primak; Alejandro R Chade; Xiangyang Zhu; Erik L Ritman; Cynthia H McCollough; Lilach O Lerman Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Richard T George; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Caterina Silva; Kakuya Kitagawa; David A Bluemke; Joao A C Lima; Albert C Lardo Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Andrew J Einstein; Kevin W Moser; Randall C Thompson; Manuel D Cerqueira; Milena J Henzlova Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-09-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Richard T George; Caterina Silva; Marco A S Cordeiro; Anthony DiPaula; Douglas R Thompson; William F McCarthy; Takashi Ichihara; Joao A C Lima; Albert C Lardo Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-06-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Karl H Schuleri; Marco Centola; Richard T George; Luciano C Amado; Kristine S Evers; Kakuya Kitagawa; Andrea L Vavere; Robert Evers; Joshua M Hare; Christopher Cox; Elliot R McVeigh; João A C Lima; Albert C Lardo Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Koen Nieman; Michael D Shapiro; Maros Ferencik; Cesar H Nomura; Suhny Abbara; Udo Hoffmann; Herman K Gold; Ik-Kyung Jang; Thomas J Brady; Ricardo C Cury Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: B M Gramer; D Muenzel; V Leber; A-K von Thaden; H Feussner; A Schneider; M Vembar; N Soni; E J Rummeny; A M Huber Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: S Feger; A Shaban; S Lukas; C Kendziorra; M Rief; E Zimmermann; M Dewey Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Victor Mor-Avi; Mita B Patel; Francesco Maffessanti; Amita Singh; Diego Medvedofsky; S Javed Zaidi; Anuj Mediratta; Akhil Narang; Noreen Nazir; Nadjia Kachenoura; Roberto M Lang; Amit R Patel Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Bernhard Bischoff; Simon Deseive; Martin Rampp; Andrei Todica; Marc Wermke; Stefan Martinoff; Steffen Massberg; Maximilian F Reiser; Hans-Christoph Becker; Jörg Hausleiter Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Amit R Patel; Francesco Maffessanti; Mita B Patel; Kalie Kebed; Akhil Narang; Amita Singh; Diego Medvedofsky; S Javed Zaidi; Anuj Mediratta; Neha Goyal; Nadjia Kachenoura; Roberto M Lang; Victor Mor-Avi Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Michael Bindschadler; Dimple Modgil; Kelley R Branch; Patrick J La Riviere; Adam M Alessio Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2016-05-02
Authors: Bernhard Bischoff; Fabian Bamberg; Roy Marcus; Florian Schwarz; Hans-Christoph Becker; Alexander Becker; Maximilian Reiser; Konstantin Nikolaou Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 2.357