Literature DB >> 20306151

Optimal technical management of stump closure following distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective review of 215 cases.

Lisa J Harris1, Hamid Abdollahi, Timothy Newhook, Patricia K Sauter, Albert G Crawford, Karen A Chojnacki, Ernest L Rosato, Eugene P Kennedy, Charles J Yeo, Adam C Berger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula (PF) is a major source of morbidity following distal pancreatectomy (DP). Our aim was to identify risk factors related to PF following DP and to determine the impact of technique of transection and stump closure.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 215 consecutive patients who underwent DP. Perioperative and postoperative data were collected and analyzed with attention to PF as defined by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula.
RESULTS: PF developed in 36 patients (16.7%); fistulas were classified as Grade A (44.4%), B (44.4%), or C (11.1%). The pancreas was transected with stapler (n = 139), cautery (n = 70), and scalpel (n = 3). PF developed in 19.8% of remnants which were stapled/oversewn and 27.7% that were stapled alone (p = 0.4). Of the 69 pancreatic remnants transected with cautery and oversewn, a fistula developed in 4.3% (p = 0.004 compared to stapled/oversewn; p = 0.006 compared to stapled/not sewn). The median length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly increased in patients who developed PF (10 vs. 6 days, p = 0.002)
CONCLUSION: The method of transection and management of the pancreatic remnant plays a critical role in the formation of PF following DP. This series suggests that transection using electrocautery followed by oversewing of the pancreatic remnant has the lowest risk of PF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20306151     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-010-1185-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  37 in total

1.  Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Butturini; Enrico Molinari; Giuseppe Mascetta; Roberto Salvia; Massimo Falconi; Andrew Gumbs; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2003-12-30       Impact factor: 2.588

Review 2.  Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands.

Authors:  N Tjarda van Heek; Koert F D Kuhlmann; Rob J Scholten; Steve M M de Castro; Olivier R C Busch; Thomas M van Gulik; Huug Obertop; Dirk J Gouma
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Transection using bipolar scissors reduces pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Manabu Kawai; Masaji Tani; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2008-08-01

4.  Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization.

Authors:  J H Balcom; D W Rattner; A L Warshaw; Y Chang; C Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-04

5.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Markus W Büchler; Markus Wagner; Bruno M Schmied; Waldemar Uhl; Helmut Friess; Kaspar Z'graggen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-12

7.  Staple line reinforcement reduces postoperative pancreatic stump leak after distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Ramon E Jimenez; Arun Mavanur; William P Macaulay
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates.

Authors:  Cristina R Ferrone; Andrew L Warshaw; David W Rattner; David Berger; Hui Zheng; Bhupendra Rawal; Ruben Rodriguez; Sarah P Thayer; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK Pancreatic Cancer Group.

Authors:  J P Neoptolemos; R C Russell; S Bramhall; B Theis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Jörg Kleeff; Markus K Diener; Kaspar Z'graggen; Ulf Hinz; Markus Wagner; Jeannine Bachmann; Jörg Zehetner; Michael W Müller; Helmut Friess; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  20 in total

1.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy: how I do it.

Authors:  Piero Marco Fisichella; Vidya Shankaran; Margo Shoup
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Modified Blumgart Suturing Technique for Remnant Closure After Distal Pancreatectomy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Fujii; Suguru Yamada; Kenta Murotani; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masashi Hattori; Mitsuro Kanda; Hideki Takami; Goro Nakayama; Shuji Nomoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Akimasa Nakao; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  The influence of staple size on fistula formation following distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Boris Sepesi; Jacob Moalem; Eva Galka; Peter Salzman; Luke O Schoeniger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Impact of distal pancreatectomy on outcomes of peritoneal surface disease treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Authors:  Andrea N Doud; Reese W Randle; Clancy J Clark; Edward A Levine; Katrina R Swett; Perry Shen; John H Stewart; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Pancreatic fistula following laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is probably unrelated to the stapler size but to the drainage modality and significantly decreased with a small suction drain.

Authors:  Safi Dokmak; Fadhel Samir Ftériche; Roberto Luca Meniconi; Béatrice Aussilhou; Igor Duquesne; Genaro Perrone; Chihebeddine Romdhani; Jacques Belghiti; Philippe Lévy; Olivier Soubrane; Alain Sauvanet
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  After distal pancreatectomy pancreatic leakage from the stump of the pancreas may be due to drain failure or pancreatic ductal back pressure.

Authors:  Yasushi Hashimoto; L William Traverso
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Complication analysis of distal pancreatectomy based on early personal experience.

Authors:  Sung-Jin Park; Hyung-Il Seo; Soo-Hee Go; Sung-Pil Yun; Ji-Yeon Lee
Journal:  Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2011-12-15

8.  Improved rate of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: parenchymal division with the use of saline-coupled radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Jack W Rostas; William O Richards; Lee W Thompson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 9.  Management of remnant pancreatic stump fto prevent the development of postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy: current evidence and our strategy.

Authors:  Isamu Makino; Hirohisa Kitagawa; Hisatoshi Nakagawara; Hidehiro Tajima; Itasu Ninomiya; Sachio Fushida; Takashi Fujimura; Tetsuo Ohta
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Recurrent pancreatic fistula occurring after nephrectomy in patients with a renal hydatid cyst: a case report.

Authors:  Cavit Ceylan; Öner Odabaş; Serkan Doğan; Metin Yığman
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.