Yasushi Hashimoto1, L William Traverso. 1. Section of General, Vascular, and Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS: The method to lower postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) involves controlling risk factors for leakage from the pancreatic stump. GOAL: The aim of this study was to identify controllable risk factors for POPF. METHODS: In order to promote homogeneity, we used a single surgeon case series and then calculated POPF with a public web-based tool based on the severity classification system of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). A total of 223 consecutive cases of DPs were reviewed. DP involved the same hand-sewn fish-mouth closure of the pancreatic stump. All received postoperative epidural anesthesia. Logistic regression analysis identified risk factors for clinically relevant POPF (grade B/C). RESULTS: Mortality was zero. ISGPS gradings were: no POPF 53%, grade A = 32%, B = 13.9%, and C = 0.9%. The clinical-relevant POPF (B/C) rate was 14.8% of which 24% represented surgical drain failure due to lack of patency and/or misplaced from their original location. Preoperative endoscopic ablation and/or stenting of Wirsung's duct was a significant risk factor to lower grade B/C leak (3%). Multivariate analysis identified two controllable risk factors-intraoperative blood loss >1,000 ml and those who did not undergo preoperative endoscopic interventions of Wirsung's duct. In the group with presumed intact pancreatic sphincters (no endoscopic intervention, n = 177), the use of postoperative intravenous opioids (with epidural failure) was a risk factor for B/C leak (34%). These findings suggest that increased back pressure in the pancreatic duct has a role in promoting pancreatic stump leakage. CONCLUSIONS: Using the ISGPS definition and its web-based tool, the incidence of clinically relevant leakage was 14.8% in 223 cases of DP. Opportunities to lower this rate are improving our surgical drain technology, limiting intraoperative blood loss, and avoiding postoperative intravenous narcotics with epidural analgesia.
HYPOTHESIS: The method to lower postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) involves controlling risk factors for leakage from the pancreatic stump. GOAL: The aim of this study was to identify controllable risk factors for POPF. METHODS: In order to promote homogeneity, we used a single surgeon case series and then calculated POPF with a public web-based tool based on the severity classification system of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). A total of 223 consecutive cases of DPs were reviewed. DP involved the same hand-sewn fish-mouth closure of the pancreatic stump. All received postoperative epidural anesthesia. Logistic regression analysis identified risk factors for clinically relevant POPF (grade B/C). RESULTS: Mortality was zero. ISGPS gradings were: no POPF 53%, grade A = 32%, B = 13.9%, and C = 0.9%. The clinical-relevant POPF (B/C) rate was 14.8% of which 24% represented surgical drain failure due to lack of patency and/or misplaced from their original location. Preoperative endoscopic ablation and/or stenting of Wirsung's duct was a significant risk factor to lower grade B/C leak (3%). Multivariate analysis identified two controllable risk factors-intraoperative blood loss >1,000 ml and those who did not undergo preoperative endoscopic interventions of Wirsung's duct. In the group with presumed intact pancreatic sphincters (no endoscopic intervention, n = 177), the use of postoperative intravenous opioids (with epidural failure) was a risk factor for B/C leak (34%). These findings suggest that increased back pressure in the pancreatic duct has a role in promoting pancreatic stump leakage. CONCLUSIONS: Using the ISGPS definition and its web-based tool, the incidence of clinically relevant leakage was 14.8% in 223 cases of DP. Opportunities to lower this rate are improving our surgical drain technology, limiting intraoperative blood loss, and avoiding postoperative intravenous narcotics with epidural analgesia.
Authors: Markus K Diener; Christoph M Seiler; Inga Rossion; Jörg Kleeff; Matthias Glanemann; Giovanni Butturini; Ales Tomazic; Christiane J Bruns; Olivier R C Busch; Stefan Farkas; Orlin Belyaev; John P Neoptolemos; Christopher Halloran; Tobias Keck; Marco Niedergethmann; Klaus Gellert; Helmut Witzigmann; Otto Kollmar; Peter Langer; Ulrich Steger; Jens Neudecker; Frederik Berrevoet; Silke Ganzera; Markus M Heiss; Steffen P Luntz; Thomas Bruckner; Meinhard Kieser; Markus W Büchler Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-04-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Cristina R Ferrone; Andrew L Warshaw; David W Rattner; David Berger; Hui Zheng; Bhupendra Rawal; Ruben Rodriguez; Sarah P Thayer; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-08-13 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Ye Rim Chang; Jae Seung Kang; Jin-Young Jang; Woo Hyun Jung; Mee Joo Kang; Kyung Bun Lee; Sun-Whe Kim Journal: World J Surg Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Allison N Martin; Sowmya Narayanan; Florence E Turrentine; Todd W Bauer; Reid B Adams; Victor M Zaydfudim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ulla Klaiber; Peter Sauer; Eike Martin; Thomas Bruckner; Steffen Luntz; Christine Tjaden; Pascal Probst; Phillip Knebel; Markus K Diener; Markus W Buchler; Thilo Hackert Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 2.692