Literature DB >> 20238253

Adaptive removal of gradients-induced artefacts on ECG in MRI: a performance analysis of RLS filtering.

Mario Sansone1, Luciano Mirarchi, Marcello Bracale.   

Abstract

One of the main vital signs used in patient monitoring during Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is Electro-Cardio-Gram (ECG). Unfortunately, magnetic fields gradients induce artefacts which severely affect ECG quality. Adaptive Noise Cancelling (ANC) is one of the preferred techniques for artefact removal. ANC involves the adaptive estimation of the impulse response of the system constituted by the MRI equipment, the patient and the ECG recording device. Least Mean Square (LMS) adaptive filtering has been traditionally employed because of its simplicity: anyway, it requires the choice of a step-size parameter, whose proper value for the specific application must be estimated case by case: an improper choice could yield slow convergence and unsatisfactory behaviour. Recursive Least Square (RLS) algorithm has, potentially, faster convergence while not requiring any parameter. As far as the authors' knowledge, there is no systematic analysis of performances of RLS in this scenario. In this study we evaluated the performance of RLS for adaptive removal of artefacts induced by magnetic field gradients on ECG in MRI, in terms of efficacy of suppression. Tests have been made on real signals, acquired via an expressly developed system. A comparison with LMS was made on the basis of opportune performance indices. Results indicate that RLS is superior to LMS in several respects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20238253     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-010-0596-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  21 in total

1.  Restoration of MR-induced artifacts in simultaneously recorded MR/EEG data.

Authors:  J Sijbers; I Michiels; M Verhoye; J Van Audekerke; A Van der Linden; D Van Dyck
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 2.  Review of patient safety in time-varying gradient fields.

Authors:  D J Schaefer; J D Bourland; J A Nyenhuis
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Removal of FMRI environment artifacts from EEG data using optimal basis sets.

Authors:  R K Niazy; C F Beckmann; G D Iannetti; J M Brady; S M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Cardiac MR imaging: state of the technology.

Authors:  J Paul Finn; Kambiz Nael; Vibhas Deshpande; Osman Ratib; Gerhard Laub
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  A comparative study of different artefact removal algorithms for EEG signals acquired during functional MRI.

Authors:  Frédéric Grouiller; Laurent Vercueil; Alexandre Krainik; Christoph Segebarth; Philippe Kahane; Olivier David
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging on five patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers.

Authors:  J R Gimbel; D Johnson; P A Levine; B L Wilkoff
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Hazardous situation in the MR bore: induction in ECG leads causes fire.

Authors:  Harald Kugel; Christoph Bremer; Marco Püschel; Roman Fischbach; Horst Lenzen; Bernd Tombach; Hugo Van Aken; Walter Heindel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Suppression of MR gradient artefacts on electrophysiological signals based on an adaptive real-time filter with LMS coefficient updates.

Authors:  R Abächerli; C Pasquier; F Odille; M Kraemer; J-J Schmid; J Felblinger
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 9.  Interventional and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J Kettenbach; D F Kacher; S K Koskinen; S G Silverman; A Nabavi; D Gering; C M Tempany; R B Schwartz; R Kikinis; P M Black; F A Jolesz
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.590

10.  Safety of gadoversetamide in patients with acute and chronic myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S Huber; R Muthupillai; B Cheong; J H Wible; D Shah; P Woodard; F Grothues; H Mahrholdt; C E Rochitte; O Masoli; R J Kim; C M Schwaiger; A Fuisz; C Kramer; A C van Rossum; R Biederman; M Lombardi; E Martin; R Kevorkian; S D Flamm
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  5 in total

1.  3DQRS: a method to obtain reliable QRS complex detection within high field MRI using 12-lead electrocardiogram traces.

Authors:  T Stan Gregory; Ehud J Schmidt; Shelley Hualei Zhang; Zion Tsz Ho Tse
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Continuous Rapid Quantification of Stroke Volume Using Magnetohydrodynamic Voltages in 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  T Stan Gregory; John Oshinski; Ehud J Schmidt; Raymond Y Kwong; William G Stevenson; Zion Tsz Ho Tse
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.792

3.  Adaptive noise cancellation to suppress electrocardiography artifacts during real-time interventional MRI.

Authors:  Vincent Wu; Israel M Barbash; Kanishka Ratnayaka; Christina E Saikus; Merdim Sonmez; Ozgur Kocaturk; Robert J Lederman; Anthony Z Faranesh
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  The Nightingale Prize 2011 for best MBEC paper in 2010.

Authors:  Jos A E Spaan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Gamma-Band Oscillations Preferential for Nociception can be Recorded in the Human Insula.

Authors:  Giulia Liberati; Anne Klöcker; Maxime Algoet; Dounia Mulders; Marta Maia Safronova; Susana Ferrao Santos; José-Géraldo Ribeiro Vaz; Christian Raftopoulos; André Mouraux
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.