Literature DB >> 20227100

The intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score predicts postdischarge complications after colon and rectal resection.

Scott E Regenbogen1, Liliana Bordeianou, Matthew M Hutter, Atul A Gawande.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We previously developed an intraoperative 10-point Surgical Apgar Score-based on blood loss, lowest heart rate, and lowest mean arterial pressure-to predict major complications after colorectal resection. However, because complications often arise after uncomplicated hospitalizations, we sought to evaluate whether this intraoperative metric would predict postdischarge complications after colectomy.
METHODS: We linked our institution's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database with an Anesthesia Intraoperative Management System for all colorectal resections over 4 years. Using Chi-square trend tests and logistic regression, we evaluated the Surgical Apgar Score's prediction for major postoperative complications before and after discharge.
RESULTS: Among 795 colectomies, there were 230 (29%) major complications within 30 days; 45 (20%) after uncomplicated discharges. Surgical Apgar Scores predicted both inpatient complications and late postdischarge complications (both P < .0001). Late complications occurred from 0 to 27 (median, 11) days after discharge; the most common were surgical site infections (42%), sepsis (24%), and venous thromboembolism (16%). In pairwise comparisons against average-scoring patients (Surgical Apgar Scores, 7-8), the relative risk of postdischarge complications trended lower, to 0.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-1.7) for those with the best scores (9-10); and were significantly higher, at 2.6 (95% CI, 1.4-4.9) for scores 5-6, and 4.5 (95% CI, 1.8-11.0) for scores 0-4.
CONCLUSION: The intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score remained a useful metric for predicting postcolectomy complications arising after uncomplicated discharges. Even late complications may thus be related to intraoperative condition and events. Surgeons could use this intraoperative metric to target low-scoring patients for intensive postdischarge surveillance and mitigation of postdischarge complications after colectomy. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20227100      PMCID: PMC2924468          DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  36 in total

1.  Identification of surgical complications and deaths: an assessment of the traditional surgical morbidity and mortality conference compared with the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Matthew M Hutter; Katherine S Rowell; Lynn A Devaney; Suzanne M Sokal; Andrew L Warshaw; William M Abbott; Richard A Hodin
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  An Apgar score for surgery.

Authors:  Atul A Gawande; Mary R Kwaan; Scott E Regenbogen; Stuart A Lipsitz; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it's later than you think.

Authors:  Neil Hyman; Thomas L Manchester; Turner Osler; Betsy Burns; Peter A Cataldo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Prioritizing quality improvement in general surgery.

Authors:  Peter L Schilling; Justin B Dimick; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Can we predict unplanned hospital readmission after colectomy for ulcerative colitis and indeterminate colitis?

Authors:  Zack Medress; Phillip R Fleshner
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Predictors and outcome of readmission after laparoscopic intestinal surgery.

Authors:  David Patrick O'Brien
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Mark E Cohen; Karl Y Bilimoria; Clifford Y Ko; Bruce Lee Hall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Does the Surgical Apgar Score measure intraoperative performance?

Authors:  Scott E Regenbogen; R Todd Lancaster; Stuart R Lipsitz; Caprice C Greenberg; Matthew M Hutter; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Utility of the surgical apgar score: validation in 4119 patients.

Authors:  Scott E Regenbogen; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Stuart R Lipsitz; Caprice C Greenberg; Matthew M Hutter; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-01

10.  Adverse outcomes after discharge: occurrence, treatment and determinants.

Authors:  P J Marang-van de Mheen; N van Duijn-Bakker; J Kievit
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2008-02
View more
  26 in total

1.  Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score in a district general hospital.

Authors:  Christopher C Thorn; Melanie Chan; Nihal Sinha; Richard A Harrison
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Can the Surgical Apgar Score predict morbidity and mortality in general orthopaedic surgery?

Authors:  Julio Urrutia; Macarena Valdes; Tomas Zamora; Valentina Canessa; Jorge Briceno
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Perioperative Information Systems: Opportunities to Improve Delivery of Care and Clinical Outcomes in Cardiac and Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  Robert E Freundlich; Jesse M Ehrenfeld
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  A low surgical Apgar score is a predictor of anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophagectomy, but not a prognostic factor.

Authors:  Masato Hayashi; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Shuhei Mayanagi; Rieko Nakamura; Koichi Suda; Norihito Wada; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.230

5.  Combining the ASA Physical Classification System and Continuous Intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score Measurement in Predicting Postoperative Risk.

Authors:  Monika Zdenka Jering; Khensani N Marolen; Matthew S Shotwell; Jason N Denton; Warren S Sandberg; Jesse Menachem Ehrenfeld
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  The surgical Apgar score is strongly associated with intensive care unit admission after high-risk intraabdominal surgery.

Authors:  Julia B Sobol; Hayley B Gershengorn; Hannah Wunsch; Guohua Li
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Costs and Consequences of Early Hospital Discharge After Major Inpatient Surgery in Older Adults.

Authors:  Scott E Regenbogen; Anne H Cain-Nielsen; Edward C Norton; Lena M Chen; John D Birkmeyer; Jonathan S Skinner
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Impact of including readmissions for qualifying events in the patient safety indicators.

Authors:  Sheryl M Davies; Olga Saynina; Laurence C Baker; Kathryn M McDonald
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  Use of the surgical Apgar score to guide postoperative care.

Authors:  J B Haddow; H Adwan; S E Clark; S Tayeh; S S Antonowicz; P Jayia; D W Chicken; T Wiggins; R Davenport; S Kaptanis; M Fakhry; C H Knowles; A S Elmetwally; E Geddoa; M S Nair; I Naeem; S Adegbola; L J Muirhead
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Surgical Apgar Score Predicted Postoperative Morbidity After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Kojiro Eto; Naoya Yoshida; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Junji Kurashige; Satoshi Ida; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Yoshifumi Baba; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Masayuki Watanabe; Hideo Baba
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.