Literature DB >> 26801506

Surgical Apgar Score Predicted Postoperative Morbidity After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Kojiro Eto1, Naoya Yoshida1, Masaaki Iwatsuki1, Junji Kurashige1, Satoshi Ida1, Takatsugu Ishimoto1, Yoshifumi Baba1, Yasuo Sakamoto1, Yuji Miyamoto1, Masayuki Watanabe2, Hideo Baba3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, a simple and easy complication prediction system, the Surgical Apgar Sore (SAS) calculated by three intraoperative parameters (estimated blood loss, lowest mean arterial pressure, and lowest heart rate), has been proposed for general surgery. This study aimed to determine if the SAS could accurately predict perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
METHODS: We investigated 399 patients who underwent esophagectomy at the Kumamoto University Hospital between April 2007 and March 2015. Clinical data, including intraoperative parameters, were collected retrospectively. Patients had postoperative morbidities classified as Clavien-Dindo grade III or more. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to elucidate factors that affected the development of complications.
RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 65.7 years, 357 patients (89.5 %) were male. The frequency of any morbidity was 32.3 %. Univariate analyses showed that the SAS as well as preoperative chemotherapy, volume of bleeding, and reconstruction of organs were associated with morbidities. Multivariate analysis showed that a SAS < 5 was found to be an independent risk factor for morbidities.
CONCLUSION: The SAS is considered to be useful for predicting the development of postoperative morbidities after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26801506     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3425-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  29 in total

1.  Tissue oxygen saturation, measured by near-infrared spectroscopy, and its relationship to surgical-site infections.

Authors:  C L Ives; D K Harrison; G S Stansby
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  An Apgar score for surgery.

Authors:  Atul A Gawande; Mary R Kwaan; Scott E Regenbogen; Stuart A Lipsitz; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Surgical Apgar score predicts perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at a high-volume center.

Authors:  M Mura Assifi; John Lindenmeyer; Benjamin E Leiby; Zvi Grunwald; Ernest L Rosato; Eugene P Kennedy; Charles J Yeo; Adam C Berger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) as a new prediction scoring system for postoperative morbidity and mortality following elective gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Y Haga; S Ikei; M Ogawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Preoperative therapy of esophagogastric cancer: the problem of nonresponding patients.

Authors:  S Blank; A Stange; L Sisic; W Roth; L Grenacher; F Sterzing; M Burian; D Jäger; M Büchler; K Ott
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Original scoring system for predicting postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Naoya Yoshida; Yoshifumi Baba; Masayuki Watanabe; Satoshi Ida; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Ryuichi Karashima; Shiro Iwagami; Yu Imamura; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Preoperative prediction of the occurrence and severity of complications after esophagectomy for cancer with use of a nomogram.

Authors:  Sjoerd M Lagarde; Johannes B Reitsma; Anna-Karin D Maris; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Olivier R C Busch; Hugo Obertop; Aelko H Zwinderman; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Effect of high perioperative oxygen fraction on surgical site infection and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: the PROXI randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Christian S Meyhoff; Jørn Wetterslev; Lars N Jorgensen; Steen W Henneberg; Claus Høgdall; Lene Lundvall; Poul-Erik Svendsen; Hannah Mollerup; Troels H Lunn; Inger Simonsen; Kristian R Martinsen; Therese Pulawska; Lars Bundgaard; Lasse Bugge; Egon G Hansen; Claus Riber; Peter Gocht-Jensen; Line R Walker; Asger Bendtsen; Gun Johansson; Nina Skovgaard; Kim Heltø; Andrei Poukinski; André Korshin; Aqil Walli; Mustafa Bulut; Palle S Carlsson; Svein A Rodt; Liselotte B Lundbech; Henrik Rask; Niels Buch; Sharafaden K Perdawid; Joan Reza; Kirsten V Jensen; Charlotte G Carlsen; Frank S Jensen; Lars S Rasmussen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Risk-adjusted prediction of operative mortality in oesophagogastric surgery with O-POSSUM.

Authors:  P P Tekkis; P McCulloch; J D Poloniecki; D R Prytherch; N Kessaris; A C Steger
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Perioperative risk assessment for gastrectomy by surgical apgar score.

Authors:  Yuichiro Miki; Masanori Tokunaga; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  8 in total

1.  Clinical usefulness of the surgical Apgar score for estimating short-term and prognostic outcomes after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Naoya Yoshida; Hideo Baba
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  The value of esophagectomy surgical apgar score (eSAS) in predicting the risk of major morbidity after open esophagectomy.

Authors:  Xue-Zhong Xing; Hai-Jun Wang; Shi-Ning Qu; Chu-Lin Huang; Hao Zhang; Hao Wang; Quan-Hui Yang; Yong Gao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  The effect of enhanced recovery after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yaxing Shen; Xiaosang Chen; Junyi Hou; Youwen Chen; Yong Fang; Zhanggang Xue; Xavier Benoit D'Journo; Robert J Cerfolio; Hiran C Fernando; Alfonso Fiorelli; Alessandro Brunelli; Jing Cang; Lijie Tan; Hao Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Improvement of the Surgical Apgar Score by Addition of Intraoperative Blood Transfusion Among Patients Undergoing Major Gastrointestinal Surgery.

Authors:  Aslam Ejaz; Faiz Gani; Steven M Frank; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  The Reliability of Surgical Apgar Score in Predicting Immediate and Late Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Abhijit Nair; Aanchal Bharuka; Basanth Kumar Rayani
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2018-01-29

6.  Reduction of oxidative stress a key for enhanced postoperative recovery with fewer complications in esophageal surgery patients: Randomized control trial to investigate therapeutic impact of anesthesia management and usefulness of simple blood test for prediction of high-risk patients.

Authors:  Masahiko Tsuchiya; Kazumasa Shiomoto; Koh Mizutani; Kazuya Fujioka; Koichi Suehiro; Tokuhiro Yamada; Eisuke F Sato; Kiyonobu Nishikawa
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Prediction of perioperative complications after robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer using the modified surgical Apgar score.

Authors:  Seon Hee Park; Jung-Yun Lee; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Sang Wun Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  An esophagectomy Surgical Apgar Score (eSAS)-based nomogram for predicting major morbidity in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yong Xi; Weiyu Shen; Lijie Wang; Chaoqun Yu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.