Literature DB >> 26359018

Combining the ASA Physical Classification System and Continuous Intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score Measurement in Predicting Postoperative Risk.

Monika Zdenka Jering1, Khensani N Marolen2, Matthew S Shotwell2, Jason N Denton2, Warren S Sandberg2, Jesse Menachem Ehrenfeld2.   

Abstract

The surgical Apgar score predicts major 30-day postoperative complications using data assessed at the end of surgery. We hypothesized that evaluating the surgical Apgar score continuously during surgery may identify patients at high risk for postoperative complications. We retrospectively identified general, vascular, and general oncology patients at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Logistic regression methods were used to construct a series of predictive models in order to continuously estimate the risk of major postoperative complications, and to alert care providers during surgery should the risk exceed a given threshold. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to evaluate the discriminative ability of a model utilizing a continuously measured surgical Apgar score relative to models that use only preoperative clinical factors or continuously monitored individual constituents of the surgical Apgar score (i.e. heart rate, blood pressure, and blood loss). AUROC estimates were validated internally using a bootstrap method. 4,728 patients were included. Combining the ASA PS classification with continuously measured surgical Apgar score demonstrated improved discriminative ability (AUROC 0.80) in the pooled cohort compared to ASA (0.73) and the surgical Apgar score alone (0.74). To optimize the tradeoff between inadequate and excessive alerting with future real-time notifications, we recommend a threshold probability of 0.24. Continuous assessment of the surgical Apgar score is predictive for major postoperative complications. In the future, real-time notifications might allow for detection and mitigation of changes in a patient's accumulating risk of complications during a surgical procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Notifications; Risk; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26359018     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-015-0332-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  29 in total

Review 1.  Advances and new insights in monitoring.

Authors:  John P Lawrence
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.750

2.  An Apgar score for surgery.

Authors:  Atul A Gawande; Mary R Kwaan; Scott E Regenbogen; Stuart A Lipsitz; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  An anesthesia medication cost scorecard--concepts for individualized feedback.

Authors:  Raymond J Malapero; Rodney A Gabriel; Robert Gimlich; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Beverly K Philip; David W Bates; Richard D Urman
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Accuracy of patient's turnover time prediction using RFID technology in an academic ambulatory surgery center.

Authors:  Florence Marchand-Maillet; Claire Debes; Fanny Garnier; Nicolas Dufeu; Didier Sciard; Marc Beaussier
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Developing a genetic fuzzy system for risk assessment of mortality after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Mahyar Taghizadeh Nouei; Ali Vahidian Kamyad; MahmoodReza Sarzaeem; Somayeh Ghazalbash
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Technology diffusion of anesthesia information management systems into academic anesthesia departments in the United States.

Authors:  Ilana S Stol; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Richard H Epstein
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Broadly applicable risk stratification system for predicting duration of hospitalization and mortality.

Authors:  Daniel I Sessler; Jeffrey C Sigl; Paul J Manberg; Scott D Kelley; Armin Schubert; Nassib G Chamoun
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Surgical outcome measurement for a global patient population: validation of the Surgical Apgar Score in 8 countries.

Authors:  Alex B Haynes; Scott E Regenbogen; Thomas G Weiser; Stuart R Lipsitz; Gerald Dziekan; William R Berry; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  How to improve the performance of intraoperative risk models: an example with vital signs using the surgical apgar score.

Authors:  Joseph A Hyder; Daryl J Kor; Robert R Cima; Arun Subramanian
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Renal Cancer in the Elderly.

Authors:  Tania González León; Maricela Morera Pérez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  The Reliability of Surgical Apgar Score in Predicting Immediate and Late Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Abhijit Nair; Aanchal Bharuka; Basanth Kumar Rayani
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2018-01-29

3.  Frailty and postoperative complications in older Chinese adults undergoing major thoracic and abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Binru Han; Qiuping Li; Xi Chen
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  Surgical Apgar score is strongly associated with postoperative ICU admission.

Authors:  Ying-Chun Lin; Yi-Chun Chen; Chen-Hsien Yang; Nuan-Yen Su
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Which Frailty Evaluation Method Can Better Improve the Predictive Ability of the SASA for Postoperative Complications of Patients Undergoing Elective Abdominal Surgery?

Authors:  Yanyan Yin; Li Jiang; Lixin Xue
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.755

6.  Prediction of perioperative complications after robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer using the modified surgical Apgar score.

Authors:  Seon Hee Park; Jung-Yun Lee; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Sang Wun Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Surgical risk assessment for gynecological oncologic patients.

Authors:  Çağlayan Biçer; Jalal Raoufi; Serhan Can İşcan; Mehmet Güney; Evrim Erdemoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-10-10

8.  [CR-POSSUM and Surgical Apgar Score as predictive factors for patients' allocation after colorectal surgery].

Authors:  Sílvia Pinho; Filipa Lagarto; Blandina Gomes; Liliana Costa; Catarina S Nunes; Carla Oliveira
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-04-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.