Literature DB >> 19153322

Utility of the surgical apgar score: validation in 4119 patients.

Scott E Regenbogen1, Jesse M Ehrenfeld, Stuart R Lipsitz, Caprice C Greenberg, Matthew M Hutter, Atul A Gawande.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To confirm the utility of a 10-point Surgical Apgar Score to rate surgical outcomes in a large cohort of patients.
DESIGN: Using electronic intraoperative records, we calculated Surgical Apgar Scores during a period of 2 years (July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2005).
SETTING: Major academic medical center. PATIENTS: Systematic sample of 4119 general and vascular surgery patients enrolled in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical outcomes database at a major academic medical center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of major postoperative complications and/or death within 30 days of surgery.
RESULTS: Of 1441 patients with scores of 9 to 10, 72 (5.0%) developed major complications within 30 days, including 2 deaths (0.1%). By comparison, among 128 patients with scores of 4 or less, 72 developed major complications (56.3%; relative risk, 11.3; 95% confidence interval, 8.6-14.8; P < .001), of whom 25 died (19.5%; relative risk, 140.7; 95% confidence interval, 33.7-587.4; P < .001). The 3-variable score achieves C statistics of 0.73 for major complications and 0.81 for deaths.
CONCLUSIONS: The Surgical Apgar Score provides a simple, immediate, objective means of measuring and communicating patient outcomes in surgery, using data routinely available in any setting. The score can be effective in identifying patients at higher- and lower-than-average likelihood of major complications and/or death after surgery and may be useful for evaluating interventions to prevent poor outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19153322     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2008.504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  31 in total

1.  Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score in a district general hospital.

Authors:  Christopher C Thorn; Melanie Chan; Nihal Sinha; Richard A Harrison
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  A composite index for predicting readmission following emergency general surgery.

Authors:  Gajanthan Muthuvel; Sarah E Tevis; Amy E Liepert; Suresh K Agarwal; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.313

3.  Basic Features and Clinical Applicability of 'Preliminary Universal Surgical Invasiveness Score' (pUSIS): A Multi-Centre Pilot Study.

Authors:  Peter Biro; Luc Sermeus; Radmilo Jankovic; Nenad Savić; Adela Hilda Onuţu; Daniela Ionescu; Daniela Godoroja; Gabriel Gurman
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-02-01

4.  Can the Surgical Apgar Score predict morbidity and mortality in general orthopaedic surgery?

Authors:  Julio Urrutia; Macarena Valdes; Tomas Zamora; Valentina Canessa; Jorge Briceno
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The value of esophagectomy surgical apgar score (eSAS) in predicting the risk of major morbidity after open esophagectomy.

Authors:  Xue-Zhong Xing; Hai-Jun Wang; Shi-Ning Qu; Chu-Lin Huang; Hao Zhang; Hao Wang; Quan-Hui Yang; Yong Gao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Comparison of prospective risk estimates for postoperative complications: human vs computer model.

Authors:  Robert E Glasgow; Mary T Hawn; Patrick W Hosokawa; William G Henderson; Sung-Joon Min; Joshua S Richman; Majed G Tomeh; Darrell Campbell; Leigh A Neumayer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Surgical Apgar score predicts perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at a high-volume center.

Authors:  M Mura Assifi; John Lindenmeyer; Benjamin E Leiby; Zvi Grunwald; Ernest L Rosato; Eugene P Kennedy; Charles J Yeo; Adam C Berger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Combining the ASA Physical Classification System and Continuous Intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score Measurement in Predicting Postoperative Risk.

Authors:  Monika Zdenka Jering; Khensani N Marolen; Matthew S Shotwell; Jason N Denton; Warren S Sandberg; Jesse Menachem Ehrenfeld
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrew C Prince; Kristine E Day; Chee Paul Lin; Benjamin J Greene; William R Carroll
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Use of the surgical Apgar score to guide postoperative care.

Authors:  J B Haddow; H Adwan; S E Clark; S Tayeh; S S Antonowicz; P Jayia; D W Chicken; T Wiggins; R Davenport; S Kaptanis; M Fakhry; C H Knowles; A S Elmetwally; E Geddoa; M S Nair; I Naeem; S Adegbola; L J Muirhead
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.