Literature DB >> 17245179

Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it's later than you think.

Neil Hyman1, Thomas L Manchester, Turner Osler, Betsy Burns, Peter A Cataldo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leaks are among the most dreaded complications after colorectal surgery. However, problems with definitions and the retrospective nature of previous analyses have been major limitations. We sought to use a prospective database to define the true incidence and presentation of anastomotic leakage after intestinal anastomosis.
METHODS: A prospective database of two colorectal surgeons was reviewed over a 10-year period (1995-2004). The incidence of leak by surgical site, timing of diagnosis, method of detection, and treatment was noted. Complications were entered prospectively by a nurse practitioner directly involved in patient care. Standardized criteria for diagnosis were used. A logistic regression model was used to discriminate statistical variation.
RESULTS: A total of 1223 patients underwent resection and anastomosis during the study period. Mean age was 59.1 years. Leaks occurred in 33 patients (2.7%). Diagnosis was made a mean of 12.7 days postoperatively, including four beyond 30 days (12.1%). There was no difference in leak rate by surgeon (3.6% vs. 2.2%; P = 0.08). The leak rate was similar by surgical site except for a markedly increased leak rate with ileorectal anastomosis (P = 0.001). Twelve leaks were diagnosed clinically versus 21 radiographically. Contrast enema correctly identified only 4 of 10 leaks, whereas CT correctly identified 17 of 19. A total of 14 of 33 (42%) patients had their leak diagnosed only after readmission. Fifteen patients required fecal diversion, whereas 18 could be managed nonoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Anastomotic leaks are frequently diagnosed late in the postoperative period and often after initial hospital discharge, highlighting the importance of prospective data entry and adequate follow-up. CT scan is the preferred diagnostic modality when imaging is required. More than half of leaks can be managed without fecal diversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17245179      PMCID: PMC1876987          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000225083.27182.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  23 in total

1.  Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C S McArdle; D C McMillan; D J Hole
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Complications after colorectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation.

Authors:  Dirk van Geldere; Patrick Fa-Si-Oen; Leslie A Noach; Peter J G M Rietra; Johannes L Peterse; Robert P A Boom
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  The double stapling technique for low anterior resection. Results, modifications, and observations.

Authors:  F D Griffen; C D Knight; J M Whitaker; C D Knight
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients.

Authors:  Arnaud Alves; Yves Panis; Danielle Trancart; Jean-Marc Regimbeau; Marc Pocard; Patrice Valleur
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-02-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Treatment of anastomotic leakage following low anterior colon resection.

Authors:  W J Mileski; R J Joehl; R V Rege; D L Nahrwold
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1988-08

6.  Management of anastomotic leakage after nondiverted large bowel resection.

Authors:  A Alves; Y Panis; M Pocard; J M Regimbeau; P Valleur
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 7.  Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  J Bruce; Z H Krukowski; G Al-Khairy; E M Russell; K G Park
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth G Walker; Stephen W Bell; Matthew J F X Rickard; Daniel Mehanna; Owen F Dent; Pierre H Chapuis; E Leslie Bokey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach.

Authors:  C Eckmann; P Kujath; T H K Schiedeck; H Shekarriz; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Gastrointestinal anastomoses. Factors affecting early complications.

Authors:  R K Jex; J A van Heerden; B G Wolff; R L Ready; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  168 in total

1.  Early detection of anastomotic leakage after elective low anterior resection.

Authors:  Elyamani Fouda; Ayman El Nakeeb; Alaa Magdy; Enas A Hammad; Gamal Othman; Mohamed Farid
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  [Diagnosis and definition of anastomotic leakage from the radiologist's perspective].

Authors:  B D Bundy; H-U Kauczor; L Grenacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Endoscopic intraoperative anastomotic testing may avoid early gastrointestinal anastomotic complications. A prospective study.

Authors:  Eva Lieto; Michele Orditura; Paolo Castellano; Margherita Pinto; Anna Zamboli; Ferdinando De Vita; Carlo Pignatelli; Gennaro Galizia
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Predicting the survival of experimental ischaemic small bowel using intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence angiography.

Authors:  A Matsui; J H Winer; R G Laurence; J V Frangioni
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective right colectomy for cancer: results from a prospective, multicentric study of 1102 patients.

Authors:  Matteo Frasson; Pablo Granero-Castro; José Luis Ramos Rodríguez; Blas Flor-Lorente; Mariela Braithwaite; Eva Martí Martínez; Jose Antonio Álvarez Pérez; Antonio Codina Cazador; Alejandro Espí; Eduardo Garcia-Granero
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Double-layered Nanofibrous Patch for Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage and Peritoneal Adhesions, Experimental Study.

Authors:  Jachym Rosendorf; Marketa Klicova; Lenka Cervenkova; Richard Palek; Jana Horakova; Andrea Klapstova; Petr Hosek; Vladimira Moulisova; Lukas Bednar; Vaclav Tegl; Ondrej Brzon; Zbynek Tonar; Vladislav Treska; David Lukas; Vaclav Liska
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Anastomotic Location Predicts Anastomotic Leakage After Elective Colonic Resection for Cancer.

Authors:  Thibault Voron; Matthieu Bruzzi; Emilia Ragot; Franck Zinzindohoue; Jean-Marc Chevallier; Richard Douard; Anne Berger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Prevention of Perioperative Anastomotic Healing Complications: Anastomotic Stricture and Anastomotic Leak.

Authors:  Kristina L Guyton; Neil H Hyman; John C Alverdy
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2016-06-29

Review 9.  Restorative procedures in colonic crohn disease.

Authors:  Sean T Martin; Jon D Vogel
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-06

Review 10.  Integrated approach to colorectal anastomotic leakage: Communication, infection and healing disturbances.

Authors:  Cloë L Sparreboom; Zhou-Qiao Wu; Jia-Fu Ji; Johan F Lange
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.