Literature DB >> 20223077

Prospective evaluation of a selective approach to cholangiography for suspected common bile duct stones.

James Horwood1, Fayaz Akbar, Katherine Davis, Richard Morgan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Common bile duct (CBD) stones can cause serious morbidity or mortality, and evidence for them should be sought in all patients with symptomatic gallstones undergoing cholecystectomy. Routine intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) involves a large commitment of time and resources, so a policy of selective cholangiography was adopted. This study prospectively evaluated the policy of selective cholangiography for patients suspected of having choledocholithiasis, and aimed to identify the factors most likely to predict the presence of CBD stones positively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 501 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for symptomatic gallstones, of whom 166 underwent IOC for suspected CBD stones, were prospectively collected. Suspicion of choledocholithiasis was based upon: (i) deranged liver function tests (past or present); (ii) history of jaundice (past or present) or acute pancreatitis; (iii) a dilated CBD or demonstration of CBD stones on imaging; or (iv) a combination of these factors. Patient demographics, intra-operative findings, complications and clinical outcomes were recorded.
RESULTS: Sixty-four cholangiograms were positive (39%). All indications for cholangiogram yielded positive results. Current jaundice yielded the highest positive predictive value (PPV; 86%). A dilated CBD on pre-operative imaging gave a PPV of 45% for CBD calculi; a history of pancreatitis produced a 26% PPV for CBD calculi. Patients with the presence of several factors suggestive of CBD stones yielded higher numbers of positive cholangiograms. Of the 64 patients having a laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), four (6%) required endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for retained stones (94% successful surgical clearance of the common bile duct) and one (2%) for a bile leak. Of the 335 patients undergoing LC alone, three (0.9%) re-presented with a retained stone, requiring intervention. There were 12 (7%) requiring conversion to open operation.
CONCLUSIONS: A selective policy for intra-operative cholangiography yields acceptably high positive results. Pre-operatively, asymptomatic bile duct stones rarely present following LC; thus, routine imaging of the biliary tree for occult calculi can safely be avoided. Therefore, a rationing approach to the use of intra-operative imaging based on the pre-operative indicators presented in this paper, successfully identifies those patients with bile duct stones requiring exploration. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration, performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon, is a safe and effective method of clearing the bile duct of calculi, with minimal complications, avoiding the necessity for an additional intervention and prolonged hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20223077      PMCID: PMC3080093          DOI: 10.1308/003588410X12628812458293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  27 in total

1.  The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  J C Varghese; R P Liddell; M A Farrell; F E Murray; H Osborne; M J Lee
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  A comparison of laparoscopic ultrasound versus cholangiography in the evaluation of the biliary tree during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J Catheline; N Rizk; G Champault
Journal:  Eur J Ultrasound       Date:  1999-09

3.  Role of selective intra-operative cholangiography during cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Singh; P C Gupta; G Sridar; R N Katariya
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  2000-02

4.  Routine laparoscopic cholangiography: a means of avoiding unnecessary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  H S Khaira; P C Ridings; R H Gompertz
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.878

5.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of intraoperative cholangiography in the prevention of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  David R Flum; Christopher Flowers; David L Veenstra
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Population-based study of cancer risk and relative survival following sphincterotomy for stones in the common bile duct.

Authors:  B M Karlson; A Ekbom; D Arvidsson; J Yuen; U B Krusemo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Laparoscopic ultrasonography during cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M A Röthlin; O Schöb; R Schlumpf; F Largiadèr
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: how selective?

Authors:  J Borjeson; S K Liu; S Jones; N M Matolo
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Spontaneous passage of bile duct stones: frequency of occurrence and relation to clinical presentation.

Authors:  S E Tranter; M H Thompson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Preoperative routine magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  M B Jendresen; J E Thorbøll; S Adamsen; H Nielsen; S Grønvall; O Hart-Hansen
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2002
View more
  19 in total

1.  Timing and nature of presentation of unsuspected retained common bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Michael R Cox; Joel P O Budge; Guy D Eslick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Eleven years of primary closure of common bile duct after choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Nuria Estellés Vidagany; Carlos Domingo Del Pozo; Nuria Peris Tomás; Jose Ángel Díez Ares; Antonio Vázquez Tarragón; Francisco Blanes Masson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Variation in the use of intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kristin M Sheffield; Yimei Han; Yong-Fang Kuo; Courtney M Townsend; James S Goodwin; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Topical nitrate drip infusion using cystic duct tube for retained bile duct stone: A six patients case series.

Authors:  Masatoshi Shoji; Hiroshi Sakuma; Yutaka Yoshimitsu; Tsutomu Maeda; Masuo Nakai; Hiroshi Ueda
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-06-27

Review 5.  Modern approach to cholecysto-choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Lapo Bencini; Cinzia Tommasi; Roberto Manetti; Marco Farsi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-02-16

6.  Contemporary management of concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: a survey of Spanish surgeons.

Authors:  Rosa Jorba; Mihai C Pavel; Erik Llàcer-Millán; Laia Estalella; Mar Achalandabaso; Elisabet Julià-Verdaguer; Esther Nve; Erlinda D Padilla-Zegarra; Josep M Badia; Donal B O'Connor; Robert Memba
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Intraoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage over primary closure of the common bile duct for choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis: a cohort study of 211 cases.

Authors:  Pei Yin; Min Wang; Renyi Qin; Jian Zhang; Guangqin Xiao; Haifeng Yu; Zhiqiang Ding; Yahong Yu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 9.  Evidence-based current surgical practice: calculous gallbladder disease.

Authors:  Casey B Duncan; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Enhanced recovery in the management of mild gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xin Zhao; Da-Zhi Chen; Ren Lang; Zhong-Kui Jin; Hua Fan; Tian-Ming Wu; Xian-Liang Li; Qiang He
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.