Literature DB >> 12831489

Spontaneous passage of bile duct stones: frequency of occurrence and relation to clinical presentation.

S E Tranter1, M H Thompson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the spontaneous passage of bile duct stones. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of spontaneous stone passage and relate it to the clinical presentation of the bile duct stone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospectively collected data were studied on a total of 1000 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with or without laparoscopic common duct exploration. Comparisons were made between 142 patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS), 468 patients who had no previous or current evidence of duct stones, and 390 patients who had good evidence of previous duct stones but none at the time of cholecystectomy. The evidence used for previous duct stones included a good history of jaundice or pancreatitis. In patients with biliary colic or cholecystitis, abnormal pre-operative liver function tests and/or a dilated common bile duct were taken as evidence of bile duct stones.
RESULTS: Of the 1000 patients studied, 532 had evidence of stones in the common bile duct at some time prior to cholecystectomy. At the time of operation, only 142 patients had bile duct stones. By implication, 80%, 84%, 93% and 55% of patients presenting with pancreatitis, colic, cholecystitis and jaundice (73% overall) had passed their bile duct stones spontaneously. All 4 patients with cholangitis had duct stones at the time of operation.
CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that most bile duct stones (3 in 4) pass spontaneously, especially after pancreatitis, biliary colic and cholecystitis but less commonly after jaundice. Cholangitis appears to be always associated with the presence of duct stones at the time of operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12831489      PMCID: PMC1964371          DOI: 10.1308/003588403321661325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  28 in total

1.  Development and evaluation of a laparoscopic common bile duct exploration simulator and procedural rating scale.

Authors:  Byron F Santos; Taylor J Reif; Nathaniel J Soper; Alexander P Nagle; Deborah M Rooney; Eric S Hungness
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a case-control study comparing the short- and long-term outcomes for a "laparoscopy-first" attitude with the outcome for sequential treatment (systematic endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy).

Authors:  Renato Costi; Antonio Mazzeo; Francesco Tartamella; Christine Manceau; Bernard Vacher; Alain Valverde
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Management of preoperatively suspected choledocholithiasis: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Bilal Kharbutli; Vic Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis: From guidelines to clinical practice.

Authors:  Joana Magalhães; Bruno Rosa; José Cotter
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-16

6.  MRCP is not a cost-effective strategy in the management of silent common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Irene Epelboym; Megan Winner; John D Allendorf
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Endoscopic treatment of duodenal fistula after incomplete closure of ERCP-related duodenal perforation.

Authors:  Dong Wook Yu; Man Yong Hong; Seung Goun Hong
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-06-16

8.  Contemporary management of concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: a survey of Spanish surgeons.

Authors:  Rosa Jorba; Mihai C Pavel; Erik Llàcer-Millán; Laia Estalella; Mar Achalandabaso; Elisabet Julià-Verdaguer; Esther Nve; Erlinda D Padilla-Zegarra; Josep M Badia; Donal B O'Connor; Robert Memba
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Early versus delayed cholecystectomy following endoscopic sphincterotomy for mild biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  Brett D Mador; O Neely M Panton; S Morad Hameed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Mild acute biliary pancreatitis vs cholelithiasis: are there differences in the rate of choledocholithiasis?

Authors:  Rosa Bertolín-Bernades; Luis Sabater-Ortí; Julio Calvete-Chornet; Bruno Camps-Vilata; Norberto Cassinello-Fernández; Miguel Oviedo-Bravo; Purificación Ivorra-García Monco; Raúl Cánovas-de Lucas; Salvador Lledó-Matoses
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.