Literature DB >> 10505997

The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.

J C Varghese1, R P Liddell, M A Farrell, F E Murray, H Osborne, M J Lee.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis in a large group of patients with bile duct stones confirmed at direct cholangiography. Also, to compare bile duct stones confirmed at direct cholangiography. Also, to compare bile duct stone characteristics using the three different investigations, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), MRCP and US.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 191 patients (M:F, 76:115; mean age, 66 years; range, 24-92 years) were investigated by direct cholangiography, MRCP and US. Their final diagnosis as determined at direct cholangiography were choledocholithiasis (n = 34), strictures (n = 47) and normal ducts (n = 110). The direct cholangiographic methods used for diagnosis of choledocholithiasis were ERCP (n = 29), intraoperative cholangiography (n = 3) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (n = 2). The bile duct stone characteristics were compared using ERCP, MRCP and US in the 29 patients in whom stones were exclusively diagnosed by ERCP.
RESULTS: Compared with the final diagnosis, MRCP had a sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 91%, 98% and 97%, respectively, in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. MRCP resulted in three false-negative and three false-positive findings, four of which occurred due to confusion with lesions at the ampulla. US had a sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 38%, 100% and 89%, respectively, in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. ERCP diagnosed more stones and the stones were more proximally distributed within the bile duct at ERCP when compared with MRCP.
CONCLUSION: MRCP has a high diagnostic accuracy (97%), similar to that at direct cholangiography, in the diagnosis of choloedocholithiasis. It has the potential to replace diagnostic ERCP and select patients with choledocholithiasis for therapeutic ERCP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10505997     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(99)90023-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  10 in total

1.  The Value of Magnetic Resonance Cholangio-Pancreatography (MRCP) in the Detection of Choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Ankur Mandelia; Arun Kumar Gupta; Devendra Kumar Verma; Sanjeev Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-09-10

Review 2.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Jing-Jia Mo; Li Lin; Chao-Qun Li; Jian-Feng Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Recurrent acute pancreatitis: clinical profile and an approach to diagnosis.

Authors:  K G Sajith; Ashok Chacko; Amit Kumar Dutta
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Lehel Somogyi; Stephen P. Martin; Charles D. Ulrich
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10

5.  Contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography: comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA and Mn-DPDP in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  K Bae; J B Na; D S Choi; J M Cho; H C Choi; K-N Jeon; M J Park; H Y Choi; J E Kim; S H Chung
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Prospective evaluation of a selective approach to cholangiography for suspected common bile duct stones.

Authors:  James Horwood; Fayaz Akbar; Katherine Davis; Richard Morgan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Accuracy of computed tomographic intravenous cholangiography (CT-IVC) with iotroxate in the detection of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Robert N Gibson; Janette M Vincent; Tony Speer; Neil A Collier; Keith Noack
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-12-31       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Is ERCP really necessary in case of suspected spontaneous passage of bile duct stones?

Authors:  Yuji Sakai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Takeshi Ishihara; Seigo Yukisawa; Tadashi Ohara; Masaru Tsuboi; Yoshihiko Ooka; Kazuki Kato; Kiyotake Katsuura; Michio Kimura; Makoto Takahashi; Kazuhisa Nemoto; Masaru Miyazaki; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Clinical models are inaccurate in predicting bile duct stones in situ for patients with gallbladder.

Authors:  B Topal; S Fieuws; K Tomczyk; R Aerts; W Van Steenbergen; C Verslype; F Penninckx
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Hospital cost categories of one-stage versus two-stage management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  B Topal; K Vromman; R Aerts; C Verslype; W Van Steenbergen; F Penninckx
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.