| Literature DB >> 20199676 |
Sabelo V Dlamini1, Khalid Beshir, Colin J Sutherland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The development of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to chloroquine (CQ) has limited its use in many malaria endemic areas of the world. However, despite recent drug policy changes to adopt the more effective artemisinin-based combination (ACT) in Africa and in the Southern African region, in 2007 Swaziland still relied on CQ as first-line anti-malarial drug.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20199676 PMCID: PMC2845184 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-68
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
pfmdr1 PCR primer sequences and reaction conditions used in Fragments 3 and 4 amplification reactions
| Gene Fragment | Primer name | Primer Sequence | Codons | PCR Cycling conditions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary FR3 | MDRF3N1 | F | 5'-GCATTTTATAATATGCATACTG-3' | 1034, 1042 | 94°C 3 min/[94°C 30 s-56°C 60 s 65°C 50 s] |
| MDRF3R1 | R | 5'-GGATTTCATAAAGTCATCAAC-3' | |||
| Nested FR3 | MDRF3N2 | F | 5'-GGTTTAGAAGATTATTTCTGTA-3' | ||
| MDRF3R1 | R | 5'-GCATTTTATAATATGCATACTG-3' | |||
| Primary FR4 | MDRF4N1 | F | 5'-CAAACCAATCTGGATCTGCAG-3' | 1246 | 94°C 3 min/[94°C 30 s-55°C 60 s-65°C 40 s] |
| MDRF4R1 | R | 5'-CAATGTTGCATCTTCTCTTCC-3' | |||
| Nested FR4 | MDRF4N2 | F | 5'-GATCTGCAGAAGATTATACTG-3' | ||
| MDRF4R1 | R | 5'-CAATGTTGCATCTTCTCTTCC-3' | |||
| FR3 | MDRF3N2 | F | 5'-GGTTTAGAAGATTATTTCTGTA-3' | 96°C 1 min | |
| MDRF3R1 | R | 5'-GCATTTTATAATATGCATACTG-3' | |||
| FR4 | MDRF4N2 | F | 5'-GATCTGCAGAAGATTATACTG-3' | ||
| MDRF4R1 | R | 5'-CAATGTTGCATCTTCTCTTCC-3' | |||
FR - Fragment F - forward R - Reverse
NB: Cycling conditions are the same for primary and nested PCRs.
Prevalence of pfcrt, pfmdr1, pfdhfr and pfdhps haplotypes in Swaziland: 1999 and 2007.
| Gene | n | Genotype/Haplotype | Prevalence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | 2007 | ||||
| 64 (1999) | CVMNK | wild-type | 5 (8%) | 1 (17%) | |
| 6 (2007) | CVIET | mutant | 45 (70%) | 5 (83%) | |
| CVMNK/CVIET | mixed | 14 (22%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| 51 (1999) | 86N | wild-type | 12 (24%) | 4 (67%) | |
| 6 (2007) | 86 | mutant | 37 (73%) | 2 (33%) | |
| 86 | mutant | 2 (4%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| 50 (1999) | 184Y | wild-type | 39 (78%) | 2 (33%) | |
| 6 (2007) | 184 | mutant | 11 (22%) | 4 (67%) | |
| 51 (1999) | 1246D | wild-type | 25 (51%) | 6 (100%) | |
| 6 (2007) | 1246 | mutant | 25 (49%) | 0 (0%) | |
| 50 (1999) | NYD | wild-type | 2 (4%) | 0 (0%) | |
| 6 (2007) | N | single-mutant 1 | 4 (8%) | 4 (67%) | |
| single-mutant 2 | 2 (4%) | 0 (0%) | |||
| NY | single-mutant 3 | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| single-mutant 4 | 15(30%) | 2 (33%) | |||
| double-mutant 1 | 19 (38%) | 0 (0%) | |||
| N | double-mutant 2 | 4(8%) | 0(0%) | ||
| double-mutant 3 | 2(4%) | 0 (0%) | |||
| triple-mutant | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | |||
| 34 (1999) | CNCSI | wild-type | 3 (8%) | 1 (17%) | |
| 6 (2007) | CNCSI/C | mixed | 0 (0%) | 1 (17%) | |
| C | triple-mutant | 28 (82%) | 3 (50%) | ||
| C | mixed | 0 (0%) | 1 (17%) | ||
| C | mixed | 3 (10%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| 27 (1999) | SAKAA | wild-type | 25 (93%) | 6 (100%) | |
| 6 (2007) | S | double-mutant | 2 (7%) | 0 (0%) | |
| 23 (1999) | CNCSI/SAKAA | 3 (13%) | 1 (17%) | ||
| 6 (2007) | C | 18 (78%) | 5(83%) | ||
| C | quintuple-mutant | 2 (9%) | 0 (0%) | ||
NB: CIRNI/CIRNL, CIRNI/CICNI and CNCSI/CIRNI mixed haplotypes have been grouped into CIRNI for analysis of the prevalence of combined dhfr/dhps mutant haplotypes. n = number of successfully genotyped samples. Mutant alleles are in bold for ease of identification.
Figure 1Prevalence of the five most common .