BACKGROUND: Our study examined the relative contributions of host, pharmacokinetic, and parasitological factors in determining the therapeutic response to artemether-lumefantrine (AL). METHODS: On the northwest border of Thailand, patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria were enrolled in prospective studies of AL treatment (4- or 6-dose regimens) and followed up for 42 days. Plasma lumefantrine concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography; malaria parasite pfmdr1 copy number was quantified using a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay (PCR), and in vitro drug susceptibility was tested. RESULTS: All treatments resulted in a rapid clinical response and were well tolerated. PCR-corrected failure rates at day 42 were 13% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6%-17%) for the 4-dose regimen and 3.2% (95% CI, 1.8%-4.6%) for the 6-dose regimen. Increased pfmdr1 copy number was associated with a 2-fold (95% CI, 1.8-2.4-fold) increase in lumefantrine inhibitory concentration(50) (P=.001) and an adjusted hazard ratio for risk of treatment failure following completion of a 4-dose regimen, but not a 6-dose regimen, of 4.0 (95% CI, 1.4-11; P=.008). Patients who had lumefantrine levels below 175 ng/mL on day 7 were more likely to experience recrudescence by day 42 (adjusted hazard ratio, 17; 95% CI, 5.5-53), allowing prediction of treatment failure with 75% sensitivity and 84% specificity. The 6-dose regimen ensured that therapeutic levels were achieved in 91% of treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: The lumefantrine plasma concentration profile is the main determinant of efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine. Amplification in pfmdr1 determines lumefantrine susceptibility and, therefore, treatment responses when plasma lumefantrine levels are subtherapeutic.
BACKGROUND: Our study examined the relative contributions of host, pharmacokinetic, and parasitological factors in determining the therapeutic response to artemether-lumefantrine (AL). METHODS: On the northwest border of Thailand, patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparummalaria were enrolled in prospective studies of AL treatment (4- or 6-dose regimens) and followed up for 42 days. Plasma lumefantrine concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography; malaria parasite pfmdr1 copy number was quantified using a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay (PCR), and in vitro drug susceptibility was tested. RESULTS: All treatments resulted in a rapid clinical response and were well tolerated. PCR-corrected failure rates at day 42 were 13% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6%-17%) for the 4-dose regimen and 3.2% (95% CI, 1.8%-4.6%) for the 6-dose regimen. Increased pfmdr1 copy number was associated with a 2-fold (95% CI, 1.8-2.4-fold) increase in lumefantrine inhibitory concentration(50) (P=.001) and an adjusted hazard ratio for risk of treatment failure following completion of a 4-dose regimen, but not a 6-dose regimen, of 4.0 (95% CI, 1.4-11; P=.008). Patients who had lumefantrine levels below 175 ng/mL on day 7 were more likely to experience recrudescence by day 42 (adjusted hazard ratio, 17; 95% CI, 5.5-53), allowing prediction of treatment failure with 75% sensitivity and 84% specificity. The 6-dose regimen ensured that therapeutic levels were achieved in 91% of treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: The lumefantrine plasma concentration profile is the main determinant of efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine. Amplification in pfmdr1 determines lumefantrine susceptibility and, therefore, treatment responses when plasma lumefantrine levels are subtherapeutic.
Authors: M T Duraisingh; P Jones; I Sambou; L von Seidlein; M Pinder; D C Warhurst Journal: Mol Biochem Parasitol Date: 2000-04-30 Impact factor: 1.759
Authors: G Lefèvre; S Looareesuwan; S Treeprasertsuk; S Krudsood; U Silachamroon; I Gathmann; R Mull; R Bakshi Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2001 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: C Luxemburger; K L Thwai; N J White; H K Webster; D E Kyle; L Maelankirri; T Chongsuphajaisiddhi; F Nosten Journal: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Date: 1996 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.184
Authors: Theonest K Mutabingwa; Devota Anthony; Archie Heller; Rachel Hallett; Jalal Ahmed; Chris Drakeley; Brian M Greenwood; Christopher J M Whitty Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Apr 23-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Patrice Piola; Carole Fogg; Francis Bajunirwe; Samuel Biraro; Francesco Grandesso; Eugene Ruzagira; Joseph Babigumira; Isaac Kigozi; James Kiguli; Juliet Kyomuhendo; Laurent Ferradini; Walter Taylor; Francesco Checchi; Jean-Paul Guthmann Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Apr 23-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: R N Price; C Cassar; A Brockman; M Duraisingh; M van Vugt; N J White; F Nosten; S Krishna Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Christian Dokomajilar; Samuel L Nsobya; Bryan Greenhouse; Philip J Rosenthal; Grant Dorsey Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: C T Happi; G O Gbotosho; O A Folarin; A Sowunmi; T Hudson; M O'Neil; W Milhous; D F Wirth; A M J Oduola Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Brian M Greenwood; David A Fidock; Dennis E Kyle; Stefan H I Kappe; Pedro L Alonso; Frank H Collins; Patrick E Duffy Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 14.808