Literature DB >> 20194335

The assessment of fracture risk.

Aasis Unnanuntana1, Brian P Gladnick, Eve Donnelly, Joseph M Lane.   

Abstract

Bone mineral density is considered to be the standard measure for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and the assessment of fracture risk. The majority of fragility fractures occur in patients with bone mineral density in the osteopenic range. The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) can be used as an assessment modality for the prediction of fractures on the basis of clinical risk factors, with or without the use of femoral neck bone mineral density. Treatment of osteoporosis should be considered for patients with low bone mineral density (a T-score of between -1.0 and -2.5) as well as a ten-year risk of hip fracture of > or = 3% or a ten-year risk of a major osteoporosis-related fracture of > or = 20% as assessed with the FRAX. Biochemical bone markers are useful for monitoring the efficacy of antiresorptive or anabolic therapy and may aid in identifying patients who have a high risk of fracture. An approach combining the assessment of bone mineral density, clinical risk factors for fracture with use of the FRAX, and bone turnover markers will improve the prediction of fracture risk and enhance the evaluation of patients with osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20194335      PMCID: PMC2827823          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  92 in total

1.  Correlation of femoral and lumbar DXA and calcaneal ultrasound, measured in situ with intact soft tissues, with the in vitro failure loads of the proximal femur.

Authors:  E M Lochmüller; J B Zeller; D Kaiser; F Eckstein; J Landgraf; R Putz; R Steldinger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The short-term effects of conjugated estrogen on bone turnover in older women.

Authors:  K M Prestwood; C C Pilbeam; J A Burleson; F N Woodiel; P D Delmas; L J Deftos; L G Raisz
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Changes in bone density and turnover explain the reductions in incidence of nonvertebral fractures that occur during treatment with antiresorptive agents.

Authors:  Marc C Hochberg; Susan Greenspan; Richard D Wasnich; Paul Miller; Desmond E Thompson; Philip D Ross
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  The management of osteoporosis following hip fracture: have we improved our care?

Authors:  Sachin Bahl; Penelope S Coates; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Alan K Ogelsby
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 6.  [Bone metabolic marker for osteoporosis].

Authors:  Kaori Shidara; Masaaki Inaba
Journal:  Nihon Rinsho       Date:  2009-05

7.  Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures.

Authors:  Ethel S Siris; Ya-Ting Chen; Thomas A Abbott; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Paul D Miller; Lois E Wehren; Marc L Berger
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-24

8.  Comparison of new biochemical markers of bone turnover in late postmenopausal osteoporotic women in response to alendronate treatment.

Authors:  P Garnero; W J Shih; E Gineyts; D B Karpf; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  FRAX and risk of vertebral fractures: the fracture intervention trial.

Authors:  Meghan G Donaldson; Lisa Palermo; John T Schousboe; Kristine E Ensrud; Marc C Hochberg; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  Bone turnover markers: understanding their value in clinical trials and clinical practice.

Authors:  R Civitelli; R Armamento-Villareal; N Napoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  83 in total

1.  Quantitative two-dimensional ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (2D UTE-MT) imaging of cortical bone.

Authors:  Ya-Jun Ma; Anthony Tadros; Jiang Du; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Short-term and long-term orthopaedic issues in patients with fragility fractures.

Authors:  Susan V Bukata; Stephen L Kates; Regis J O'Keefe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Predicting hip and major osteoporotic fractures using administrative data.

Authors:  Huifeng Yun; Elizabeth Delzell; Kristine E Ensrud; Meredith L Kilgore; David Becker; Michael A Morrisey; Jeffrey R Curtis
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-22

Review 4.  Osteoporosis: now and the future.

Authors:  Tilman D Rachner; Sundeep Khosla; Lorenz C Hofbauer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  A guide to improving the care of patients with fragility fractures.

Authors:  Susan V Bukata; Benedict F Digiovanni; Susan M Friedman; Harry Hoyen; Amy Kates; Stephen L Kates; Simon C Mears; Daniel A Mendelson; Fernando H Serna; Frederick E Sieber; Wakenda K Tyler
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2011-01

Review 6.  A Comprehensive Review of the Diagnosis and Pharmacological Management of Crohn's Disease in the Elderly Population.

Authors:  David Kim; Sasha Taleban
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  Osteoporosis, bone mineral density and CKD-MBD: treatment considerations.

Authors:  Jordi Bover; Lucía Bailone; Víctor López-Báez; Silvia Benito; Paola Ciceri; Andrea Galassi; Mario Cozzolino
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.902

8.  Comparison between frailty index of deficit accumulation and fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) in prediction of risk of fractures.

Authors:  Guowei Li; Lehana Thabane; Alexandra Papaioannou; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Evaluation of bone remodeling with (18)F-fluoride and correlation with the glucose metabolism measured by (18)F-FDG in lumbar spine with time in an experimental nude rat model with osteoporosis using dynamic PET-CT.

Authors:  Caixia Cheng; Christian Heiss; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; P Govindarajan; G Schlewitz; Leyun Pan; Reinhard Schnettler; Klaus Weber; Ludwig G Strauss
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-03-08

10.  Evaluation of new bone formation in normal and osteoporotic rats with a 3-mm femur defect: functional assessment with dynamic PET-CT (dPET-CT) using 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose ( (18)F-FDG) and (18)F-fluoride.

Authors:  Caixia Cheng; Volker Alt; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; Leyun Pan; Ulrich Thormann; Reinhard Schnettler; Klaus Weber; Ludwig G Strauss
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.