Literature DB >> 19419318

FRAX and risk of vertebral fractures: the fracture intervention trial.

Meghan G Donaldson1, Lisa Palermo, John T Schousboe, Kristine E Ensrud, Marc C Hochberg, Steven R Cummings.   

Abstract

The validity of the WHO 10-yr probability of major osteoporotic fracture model (FRAX) for prediction of vertebral fracture has not been tested. We analyzed how well FRAX for major osteoporotic fractures, with and without femoral neck BMD (FN BMD), predicted the risk of vertebral fracture. We also compared the predictive validity of FRAX, FN BMD, and prevalent vertebral fracture detected by radiographs at baseline alone or in combination to predict future vertebral fracture. We analyzed data from the placebo groups of FIT (3.8-yr follow-up, n = 3221) with ORs and areas under receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves (AUC). FRAX with and without FN BMD predicted incident radiographic vertebral fracture. The AUC was significantly greater for FRAX with FN BMD (AUC = 0.71) than FRAX without FN BMD (AUC = 0.68; p = 0.002). Prevalent vertebral fracture plus age and FN BMD (AUC = 0.76) predicted incident radiographic vertebral fracture as well as a combination of prevalent vertebral fracture and FRAX with FN BMD (AUC = 0.75; p = 0.76). However, baseline vertebral fracture status plus age and FN BMD (AUC = 0.76) predicted incident radiographic vertebral fracture significantly better than FRAX with FN BMD (AUC = 0.71; p = 0.0017). FRAX for major osteoporotic fractures (with and without FN BMD) predicts vertebral fracture. However, once FN BMD and age are known, the eight additional risk factors in FRAX do not significantly improve the prediction of vertebral fracture. A combination of baseline radiographic vertebral fracture, FN BMD, and age is the strongest predictor of future vertebral fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19419318     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.090511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  31 in total

1.  Five-year follow-up study of a kidney-tonifying herbal Fufang for prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis and fragility fractures.

Authors:  Wei-Min Deng; Peng Zhang; Hai Huang; You-Gao Shen; Qin-Hua Yang; Wei-Li Cui; Yang-Shu He; Song Wei; Zhu Ye; Fang Liu; Ling Qin
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Guidance for the prevention of bone loss and fractures in postmenopausal women treated with aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer: an ESCEO position paper.

Authors:  R Rizzoli; J J Body; A DeCensi; A De Censi; J Y Reginster; P Piscitelli; M L Brandi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Predictive value of FRAX for fracture in obese older women.

Authors:  Melissa Premaor; Richard A Parker; Steve Cummings; Kris Ensrud; Jane A Cauley; Li-Yung Lui; Theresa Hillier; Juliet Compston
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Obesity, bone density relative to body weight and prevalent vertebral fracture at age 62 years: the Newcastle thousand families study.

Authors:  H A Rudman; F Birrell; M S Pearce; S P Tuck; R M Francis; L Treadgold; K Hind
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Increased fracture risk assessed by fracture risk assessment tool in Greek patients with Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Sotirios Terzoudis; Christos Zavos; John Damilakis; John Neratzoulakis; Daphne Anna Dimitriadi; Maria Roussomoustakaki; Elias A Kouroumalis; Ioannis E Koutroubakis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  High precision semiautomated computed tomography measurement of lumbar disk and vertebral heights.

Authors:  Sovira Tan; Jianhua Yao; Lawrence Yao; Michael M Ward
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Discriminative value of FRAX for fracture prediction in a cohort of Chinese postmenopausal women.

Authors:  E Y N Cheung; C H Bow; C L Cheung; C Soong; S Yeung; C Loong; A Kung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  A comparison of prediction models for fractures in older women: is more better?

Authors:  Kristine E Ensrud; Li-Yung Lui; Brent C Taylor; John T Schousboe; Meghan G Donaldson; Howard A Fink; Jane A Cauley; Teresa A Hillier; Warren S Browner; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14

9.  Assessment of individual fracture risk: FRAX and beyond.

Authors:  Joop P W van den Bergh; Tineke A C M van Geel; Willem F Lems; Piet P Geusens
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 10.  A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX : A report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Helena Johansson; Anders Odén; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.