Literature DB >> 12096837

International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment.

John A Kanis1, Olof Johnell, Chris De Laet, Bengt Jonsson, Anders Oden, Alan K Ogelsby.   

Abstract

It is recommended that intervention thresholds should be based on absolute fracture risk, but there is a large variation in hip fracture incidence from different regions of the world. The aim of this study was to examine heterogeneity of hip fracture probability in different regions from recent estimates of hip fracture incidence and mortality to adjust intervention thresholds. Ten-year probabilities of hip fracture were computed in men and women at 10-year intervals from the age of 50 years and lifetime risks at the age of 50 years from the hazard functions of hip fracture and death. Lifetime risk at the age of 50 years varied from 1% in women from Turkey to 28.5% in women from Sweden. High lifetime risks in women were associated with high lifetime risks in men (r = 0.83). There also were significant correlations of 10-year risk at any age between men and women. Ten-year probability was standardized to that of men and women from Sweden (set at 1.0). There was a 15-fold range in 10-year probability from 1.24 in Norway to 0.08 in Chile. Countries were categorized by 10-year probabilities comprising very high risk (Norway, Iceland, Sweden, Denmark, and the United States), high risk (China [Taiwan [TW]], Germany, Switzerland, Finland, Greece, Canada, The Netherlands, Hungary, Singapore, Italy, United Kingdom, Kuwait, Australia, and Portugal), medium risk (China [Hong Kong [HK]], France, Japan, Spain, Argentina, and China), and low risk (Turkey, Korea, Venezuela, and Chile). The categorization of hip fracture probabilities can be used to adjust intervention thresholds based on age, sex, and relative risk from a reference population such as Sweden.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12096837     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.7.1237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  194 in total

Review 1.  Genetic aspects of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Takayuki Hosoi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Development and use of FRAX in osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; E V McCloskey; H Johansson; A Oden; O Ström; F Borgström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  Sanford Baim; William D Leslie
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Trabecular microstructure is influenced by race and sex in Black and White young adults.

Authors:  K L Popp; C Xu; A Yuan; J M Hughes; G Unnikrishnan; J Reifman; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Comparative statistical analysis of osteoporosis treatment based on Hungarian claims data and interpretation of the results in respect to cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  P Lakatos; E Tóth; L Szekeres; G Poór; G Héjj; I Marton; I Takács
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Latitude, socioeconomic prosperity, mobile phones and hip fracture risk.

Authors:  O Johnell; F Borgstrom; B Jonsson; J Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Epidemiology of distal forearm fractures in Oslo, Norway.

Authors:  C M Lofthus; F Frihagen; H E Meyer; L Nordsletten; K Melhuus; J A Falch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Bone mineral density at the hip in Norwegian women and men--prevalence of osteoporosis depends on chosen references: the Tromsø Study.

Authors:  Nina Emaus; Tone K Omsland; Luai Awad Ahmed; Guri Grimnes; Monica Sneve; Gro K Berntsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 9.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin; Eric Orwoll
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 10.  Chronic kidney disease and bone fracture: a growing concern.

Authors:  Thomas L Nickolas; Mary B Leonard; Elizabeth Shane
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 10.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.