Literature DB >> 20182733

Intra-individual comparison of different contrast media concentrations (300 mg, 370 mg and 400 mg iodine) in MDCT.

Florian F Behrendt1, Hubertus Pietsch, Gregor Jost, Martin A Sieber, Sebastian Keil, Cedric Plumhans, Peter Seidensticker, Rolf W Günther, Andreas H Mahnken.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare intra-individual contrast enhancement in multi-detector-row computed tomography (MDCT) using contrast media (CM) containing 300, 370 and 400 mg iodine per ml (mgI/ml).
METHODS: Six pigs underwent repeated chest MDCT using three different CM (iopromide 300, iopromide 370, iomeprol 400). An identical iodine delivery (IDR) rate of 1.5 gI/s and a constant total iodine dose of 300 mg/kg body weight were used. Dynamic CT were acquired at the level of the pulmonary artery, and the ascending and descending aorta. After the time enhancement curves were computed, the pulmonary and aortic peak enhancement, time to peak and plateau time above 300 HU were calculated.
RESULTS: Intra-individual peak contrast enhancement was significantly higher for the 300 mgI/ml contrast medium compared with the 370 and 400 mgI/ml media: pulmonary trunk 595 HU vs 516 HU (p = 0.0093) vs 472 HU (p = 0.0005), and aorta 505 HU vs 454 HU (p = 0.0008) vs 439 HU (p = 0.0001), respectively. Comparison of time to peaks showed no significant difference. Plateau times were significantly longer for the 300 mgI/ml than for the 370 and 400 mgI/ml CM at all anatomical sites.
CONCLUSION: Given normalised IDR and total iodine burden, the use of CM with a standard concentration with 300 mg iodine/ml provides improved contrast enhancement compared with highly concentrated CM in the chest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20182733     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1717-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  25 in total

Review 1.  Multislice CT angiography.

Authors:  M Prokop
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 2.  Use of high concentration contrast media: principles and rationale-vascular district.

Authors:  Dominik Fleischmann
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Hepatic enhancement in multiphasic contrast-enhanced MDCT: comparison of high- and low-iodine-concentration contrast medium in same patients with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Akihiro Furuta; Katsuyoshi Ito; Takeshi Fujita; Shinji Koike; Ayame Shimizu; Naofumi Matsunaga
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Comparison of enhancement, image quality, cost, and adverse reactions using 2 different contrast medium concentrations for routine chest CT on 16-slice MDCT.

Authors:  Bindu N Setty; Dushyant V Sahani; Kathy Ouellette-Piazzo; Peter F Hahn; Jo-Anne O Shepard
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Accuracy of gamma-variate fits to concentration-time curves from dynamic susceptibility-contrast enhanced MRI: influence of time resolution, maximal signal drop and signal-to-noise.

Authors:  T Benner; S Heiland; G Erb; M Forsting; K Sartor
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Contrast enhancement in chest multidetector computed tomography: intraindividual comparison of 300 mg/ml versus 400 mg/ml iodinated contrast medium.

Authors:  Florian F Behrendt; Cedric Plumhans; Sebastian Keil; Georg Mühlenbruch; Marco Das; Peter Seidensticker; Christina Mutscher; Rolf W Günther; Andreas H Mahnken
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model.

Authors:  K T Bae; J P Heiken; J A Brink
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Factors influencing vascular and hepatic enhancement at CT: experimental study on injection protocol using a canine model.

Authors:  J K Han; A Y Kim; K Y Lee; J B Seo; T K Kim; B I Choi; C S Lhee; M C Han
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Hepatic CT enhancement: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in the same patients.

Authors:  T P Chambers; R L Baron; R M Lush; G D Dodd; W J Miller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight.

Authors:  Kazuo Awai; Kumiko Hiraishi; Shinichi Hori
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  8 in total

1.  Contrast medium injection protocol adjusted for body surface area in combined PET/CT.

Authors:  Florian F Behrendt; Marilou Rebière; Andreas Goedicke; Hubertus Pietsch; Karin Palmowski; Christiane K Kuhl; Felix M Mottaghy; Frederik A Verburg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Body size indices to determine iodine mass with contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography of the upper abdomen: does body surface area outperform total body weight or lean body weight?

Authors:  Hiroshi Kondo; Masayuki Kanematsu; Satoshi Goshima; Haruo Watanabe; Hiroshi Kawada; Noriyuki Moriyama; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Contrast agent and radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT by a combination of low tube voltage and advanced image reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  Nico Buls; Gert Van Gompel; Toon Van Cauteren; Koenraad Nieboer; Inneke Willekens; Guy Verfaillie; Paul Evans; Sven Macholl; Ben Newton; Johan de Mey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Improved enhancement in CT angiography with reduced contrast media iodine concentrations at constant iodine dose.

Authors:  Toon Van Cauteren; Gert Van Gompel; Koenraad H Nieboer; Inneke Willekens; Paul Evans; Sven Macholl; Steven Droogmans; Johan de Mey; Nico Buls
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Comparison of Iohexol-380 and Iohexol-350 for Coronary CT Angiography: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Phase 3 Trial.

Authors:  Eun-Ah Park; Whal Lee; Doo Kyoung Kang; Sung Jin Kim; Young-Ju Kim; Yookyung Kim; Yon Mi Sung; Soon-Young Song; Yu-Whan Oh; Hwan Seok Yong; Heon Lee; Eui-Yong Jeon; Gong-Yong Jin; Byoung Wook Choi; Sang-Il Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  More holes, more contrast? Comparing an 18-gauge non-fenestrated catheter with a 22-gauge fenestrated catheter for cardiac CT.

Authors:  Andreas Marco Fischer; Philipp Riffel; Thomas Henzler; U Joseph Schoepf; Andres F Abadia; Richard Robert Bayer; Holger Haubenreisser; Dante Giovagnoli; Alexander Kremer; Stefan O Schoenberg; Joshua Gawlitza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Low kV Computed Tomography of Parenchymal Abdominal Organs-A Systematic Animal Study of Different Contrast Media Injection Protocols.

Authors:  Daniel Overhoff; Gregor Jost; Michael McDermott; Olaf Weber; Hubertus Pietsch; Stefan O Schoenberg; Ulrike Attenberger
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2021-11-29

8.  Dual-energy CT angiography in suspected pulmonary embolism: influence of injection protocols on image quality and perfused blood volume.

Authors:  Aleksander Kosmala; Philipp Gruschwitz; Simon Veldhoen; Andreas Max Weng; Bernhard Krauss; Thorsten Alexander Bley; Bernhard Petritsch
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.357

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.