Literature DB >> 19068227

Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration.

Lawrence T Cohen1.   

Abstract

In this, the third paper of the series, the loudness of low-rate bursts of electrical pulses was measured as a function of the burst duration, in subjects implanted with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system (three with straight and two with Contour electrode arrays). In order to help distinguish between the contributions of peripheral and more central effects, the ECAP was recorded to the individual pulses comprising the bursts, using the Neural Response Telemetry (NRT) system. At a pulse rate of 250 pulses/s, the ECAP amplitude did not decrease greatly during the bursts: the mean reduction factor was 0.89. The time-constant for summation of the loudness contributions from the pulses comprising a burst was found to be larger than that associated with normal hearing. In addition, the first pulse of a pulse train was found to contribute much more to the overall loudness than did the subsequent pulses, although a corresponding difference was not observed in the ECAP recordings. These results establish a necessary connection between the essentially single-pulse model, developed in the fourth and fifth papers of the series, and the psychophysical data for pulse bursts, but they also have broader implications.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19068227     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  6 in total

1.  Encoding and decoding amplitude-modulated cochlear implant stimuli--a point process analysis.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Eric Shea-Brown; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Audibility emphasis of low-level sounds improves consonant identification while preserving vowel identification for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Susan R S Bissmeyer; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.723

3.  Pitch perception is more robust to interference and better resolved when provided by pulse rate than by modulation frequency of cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Andres Camarena; Susan R S Bissmeyer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.672

4.  A Phenomenological Model Reproducing Temporal Response Characteristics of an Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Fiber.

Authors:  Marko Takanen; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

5.  Modeling of Auditory Neuron Response Thresholds with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Frederic Venail; Thibault Mura; Mohamed Akkari; Caroline Mathiolon; Sophie Menjot de Champfleur; Jean Pierre Piron; Marielle Sicard; Françoise Sterkers-Artieres; Michel Mondain; Alain Uziel
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Learning Pitch with STDP: A Computational Model of Place and Temporal Pitch Perception Using Spiking Neural Networks.

Authors:  Nafise Erfanian Saeedi; Peter J Blamey; Anthony N Burkitt; David B Grayden
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.