Literature DB >> 26628955

Measurement for natural dental neck data of normal adults and its clinical significance on guiding implant restoration.

Mingxu Sun1, Fang Gu1, Junjun Wang2, Chengyuan Zhou1, Junnan Xia1, Hongwei Qin1, Jianjun Yang3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Provide reference basis for the clinical implant restoration to select implant diameter through measuring each data of 7 teeth in the dental neck of bilateral upper and lower jaws of the young volunteers with normal dentition.
METHODS: Select 30 healthy young volunteers with complete dentition but no malocclusion, take cone beam CT (CBCT), measure the mesiodistal and buccolingual distance of the tooth root at 1.5 mm from 14 teeth (bilateral upper and lower jaws) to alveolar crest, trace out the outline of each tooth neck in this layer, calculate the cross sectional area and roundness of each tooth neck according to pixel value calibration, and then carry out statistical processing.
RESULTS: Complete the data collection and processing of mesiodistal length, buccolingual width, cross sectional area, and cross sectional roundness of the dental neck at 1.5 mm from these seven teeth of the bilateral upper and lower jaws to the alveolar crest of 30 volunteers, and calculate the mean value, variance, and reference value range of medical science of each index.
CONCLUSION: CBCT can effectively obtain the image information of the dental neck. Through mimics 10.0 and Photoshop CS3, it is possible to accurately calculate the dental neck length and width, and cross sectional area of each tooth according to CBCT image information. This result can provide reference basis for the implant restoration of the clinical teeth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Natural tooth; cone beam computed tomography; dental implant; measurement

Year:  2015        PMID: 26628955      PMCID: PMC4658844     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  15 in total

1.  Statistical analysis of the diachronic loss of interproximal contact between fixed implant prostheses and adjacent teeth.

Authors:  Hidehiro Koori; Keizo Morimoto; Yoshihiro Tsukiyama; Kiyoshi Koyano
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  Effect of the vertical and horizontal distances between adjacent implants and between a tooth and an implant on the incidence of interproximal papilla.

Authors:  Jose Fabio Gastaldo; Patricia Ramos Cury; Wilson Roberto Sendyk
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  The evaluation of digital panoramic radiographs taken for implant dentistry in the daily practice.

Authors:  Jun-Beom Park
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2010-07-01

4.  Photoelastic stress analysis in prosthetic implants of different diameters: mini, narrow, standard or wide.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Alves Aldiéris Pesqueira; Daniela Micheline Dos Santos; Marcela Filié Haddad; Amália Moreno
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-09-20

5.  Long Term Follow-Up of Dental Implants Placed in Autologous Onlay Bone Graft.

Authors:  Devorah Schwartz-Arad; Ronen Ofec; Galit Eliyahu; Angela Ruban; Nir Sterer
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.932

6.  A study of force distribution of loading stresses on implant-bone interface on short implant length using 3-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ning Kang; Yan-Yun Wu; Ping Gong; Li Yue; Guo-Min Ou
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2014-06-14

7.  Biomechanical finite element analysis of self-tapping implants with different dimensions inserted in two bone qualities.

Authors:  Istabrak Hasan; Friedhelm Heinemann; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.411

8.  Influence of implant diameters on the integration of screw implants. An experimental study in rabbits.

Authors:  C J Ivanoff; L Sennerby; C Johansson; B Rangert; U Lekholm
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Mazyar Moshiri; William C Scarfe; Michael L Hilgers; James P Scheetz; Anibal M Silveira; Allan G Farman
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Vertical Guided Bone Regeneration using Titanium-reinforced d-PTFE Membrane and Prehydrated Corticocancellous Bone Graft.

Authors:  Alessandro Cucchi; Paolo Ghensi
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2014-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.