Literature DB >> 20164268

Evaluation of chromogenic media for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar1, José Cortinas Abrahantes, Wilber Sabiiti, Christine Lammens, Greetje Vercauteren, Margareta Ieven, Geert Molenberghs, Marc Aerts, Herman Goossens.   

Abstract

Rapid laboratory diagnosis is critical for treating, managing, and preventing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. We evaluated and compared the potential for MRSA detection of five chromogenic media, Brilliance MRSA agar (Oxoid), ChromID (bioMérieux), MRSASelect (Bio-Rad), CHROMagar (CHROMagar Microbiology), and BBL-CHROMagar (BD Diagnostics). Media were tested with log serial dilutions (10(0) to 10(6) CFU) of pure isolates of MRSA (n = 60), non-MRSA (n = 27), and defined mixtures thereof simulating clinical samples (n = 84). Further evaluations were done on pre-enriched nasal and groin screening swabs (n = 213) from 165 hospitalized patients. Randomized samples were spiral plated on each medium and independently scored by five investigators for characteristic colonies at 24 and 48 h of incubation. Confirmatory testing of up to five putative MRSA colonies recovered from each medium was done. The cumulative average sensitivity with isolates, mixtures, and clinical samples was the highest for Brilliance MRSA agar (97%) and similar for the other four media (>or=92%). The cumulative average specificity was the highest for BBL-CHROMagar (99%), followed by MRSASelect (98%), CHROMagar (97%), ChromID (89%), and Brilliance MRSA agar (86%). All of the media detected MRSA at 10 and 1 CFU, although at these low loads, few MRSA samples harboring SCCmec type III or IV were misinterpreted as non-MRSA by investigators. False-positive results were mainly due to methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis. For an arbitrary MRSA prevalence of 5% and based on patient sample evaluations, the positive predictive values for BBL-CHROMagar and CHROMagar ( approximately 84%) were the highest. The negative predictive values of all of the media were >or=92% for MRSA prevalences ranging from 5% to 30%. In conclusion, BBL-CHROMagar and CHROMagar gave the best overall results for detection of MRSA, irrespective of the sample concentration, investigator, or incubation period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20164268      PMCID: PMC2849574          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01745-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  21 in total

1.  A novel multiplex real-time PCR assay for rapid typing of major staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec elements.

Authors:  Patrice Francois; Gesuele Renzi; Didier Pittet; Manuela Bento; Daniel Lew; Stephan Harbarth; Pierre Vaudaux; Jacques Schrenzel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Risk factors for developing clinical infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) amongst hospital patients initially only colonized with MRSA.

Authors:  R Coello; J R Glynn; C Gaspar; J J Picazo; J Fereres
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Does nasal cocolonization by methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains occur frequently enough to represent a risk of false-positive methicillin-resistant S. aureus determinations by molecular methods?

Authors:  Karsten Becker; Isabelle Pagnier; Brigitte Schuhen; Frauke Wenzelburger; Alexander W Friedrich; Frank Kipp; Georg Peters; Christof von Eiff
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of three chromogenic media (MRSA-ID, MRSA-Select and CHROMagar MRSA) and ORSAB for surveillance cultures of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  I Nahimana; P Francioli; D S Blanc
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 5.  Control of endemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus--recent advances and future challenges.

Authors:  S Harbarth
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  Impact of a short period of pre-enrichment on detection and bacterial loads of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from screening specimens.

Authors:  L Van Heirstraeten; J Cortiñas Abrahantes; C Lammens; A Lee; S Harbarth; G Molenberghs; M Aerts; H Goossens; S Malhotra-Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Epidemiological study of staphylococcal colonization and cross-infection in two West African Hospitals.

Authors:  M Aires De Sousa; I Santos Sanches; M L Ferro; H De Lencastre
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.431

8.  Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system, and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test.

Authors:  Annie Felten; Bernadette Grandry; Philippe Henri Lagrange; Isabelle Casin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  New real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from specimens containing a mixture of staphylococci.

Authors:  A Huletsky; R Giroux; V Rossbach; M Gagnon; M Vaillancourt; M Bernier; F Gagnon; K Truchon; M Bastien; F J Picard; A van Belkum; M Ouellette; P H Roy; M G Bergeron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of rapid screening and pre-emptive contact isolation for detecting and controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in critical care: an interventional cohort study.

Authors:  Stephan Harbarth; Cristina Masuet-Aumatell; Jacques Schrenzel; Patrice Francois; Christophe Akakpo; Gesuele Renzi; Jerome Pugin; Bara Ricou; Didier Pittet
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  25 in total

1.  Culture-based detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by a network of European laboratories: an external quality assessment study.

Authors:  M Gazin; A Lee; L Derde; M Kazma; C Lammens; M Ieven; M Bonten; Y Carmeli; S Harbarth; C Brun-Buisson; H Goossens; S Malhotra-Kumar
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Evaluation of molecular assays for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Liesbet Van Heirstraeten; Andie Lee; José Cortinas Abrahantes; Christine Lammens; Evelyn Vanhommerig; Geert Molenberghs; Marc Aerts; Stephan Harbarth; Herman Goossens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Transmission rates, screening methods and costs of MRSA--a systematic literature review related to the prevalence in Germany.

Authors:  A Tübbicke; C Hübner; A Kramer; N-O Hübner; S Fleßa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Dutch guideline on the laboratory detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M F Q Kluytmans-van den Bergh; M C Vos; B M W Diederen; C M J E Vandenbroucke-Grauls; A Voss; J A J W Kluytmans
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Performance evaluation of a modified chromogenic medium, ChromID MRSA New, for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from clinical specimens.

Authors:  F Van Hoecke; N Deloof; G Claeys
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 6.  A Decade of Development of Chromogenic Culture Media for Clinical Microbiology in an Era of Molecular Diagnostics.

Authors:  John D Perry
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Cost-benefit analysis from the hospital perspective of universal active screening followed by contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriers.

Authors:  James A McKinnell; Sarah M Bartsch; Bruce Y Lee; Susan S Huang; Loren G Miller
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  Evaluation of sampling locations in pregnant women and newborns for the detection of colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Authors:  M Zamfir; A C Adler; S Kolb; A Dammeyer; L Nasri; L Schomacher; B Karlin; M Franitza; S Hörmansdorfer; C Tuschak; G Valenza; U Ochmann; C Herr
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Efficient processing of MRSA screening specimens by a modified inoculation protocol.

Authors:  Philipp Thelen; Kirsten Hornberg; Axel Hamprecht
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 10.  Chromogenic media for MRSA diagnostics.

Authors:  Zhenbo Xu; Yuchao Hou; Brian M Peters; Dingqiang Chen; Bing Li; Lin Li; Mark E Shirtliff
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.