Literature DB >> 12149327

Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system, and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test.

Annie Felten1, Bernadette Grandry, Philippe Henri Lagrange, Isabelle Casin.   

Abstract

Very-low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), or class 1 MRSA, is often misdiagnosed as methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). We evaluated the performances of three methods for detection of low-level methicillin resistance: the disk diffusion method using the cephamycin antibiotics cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux), and the MRSA-screen test (Denka). Detection of the mecA gene by PCR was considered to be the "gold standard." We also determined the sensitivity of the oxacillin disk diffusion method with 5- and 1-microg disks and that of the Oxascreen agar assay with 6 mg of oxacillin liter(-1) for detection of MRSA. We compared the distributions of MICs of oxacillin and cefoxitin by the E-test (AB Biodisk), and those of moxalactam by dilutions in agar, for MRSA and MSSA isolates. The 152 clinical isolates of S. aureus studied were divided into 69 MSSA (mecA-negative) and 83 MRSA (mecA-positive) isolates, including 63 heterogeneous isolates and 26 class 1 isolates (low-level resistance). The cefoxitin and moxalactam disk diffusion tests detected 100% of all the MRSA classes: cefoxitin inhibition zone diameters were <27 mm, and moxalactam inhibition zone diameters were <24 mm. The Vitek 2 system and the MRSA-screen test detected 94 and 97.6% of all MRSA isolates, respectively. The sensitivities of the 5- and 1-microg oxacillin disks were 95.2 and 96.4%, respectively, whereas that of the Oxascreen agar screen assay was 94%. All of the tests except the 1-microg oxacillin disk test were 100% specific. For the class 1 MRSA isolates, the sensitivity of the Vitek 2 test was 92.3%, whereas those of the MRSA-screen test and the disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam were 100%. Therefore, the cefoxitin and moxalactam disk diffusion methods were the best-performing tests for routine detection of all classes of MRSA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12149327      PMCID: PMC120619          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.8.2766-2771.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  27 in total

1.  Phenotypic and molecular typing of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains susceptible to gentamicin isolated in france from 1995 to 1997.

Authors:  J O Galdbart; A Morvan; N El Solh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  [Antibiogram Committee of the French Microbiology Society. Report 2000-2001].

Authors:  C J Soussy; G Carret; J D Cavallo; H Chardon; C Chidiac; P Choutet; P Courvalin; H Dabernat; H Drugeon; L Dubreuil; F Goldstein; V Jarlier; R Leclercq; M H Nicolas-Chanoine; A Philippon; C Quentin; B Rouveix; J Sirot
Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)       Date:  2000-11

3.  Evaluation of three rapid methods for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  L Louie; S O Matsumura; E Choi; M Louie; A E Simor
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Stable classes of phenotypic expression in methicillin-resistant clinical isolates of staphylococci.

Authors:  A Tomasz; S Nachman; H Leaf
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Genotypic identification of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  S C Predari; M Ligozzi; R Fontana
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Increased susceptibility to cephamycin-type antibiotics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus defective in penicillin-binding protein 2.

Authors:  K Murakami; K Nomura; M Doi; T Yoshida
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Comparison of the Vitek Gram-Positive Susceptibility 106 card and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test for determining oxacillin resistance in clinical bloodstream isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  T Yamazumi; S A Marshall; W W Wilke; D J Diekema; M A Pfaller; R N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Emergence of methicillin-resistant clones from cephamycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  K Okonogi; Y Noji; M Kondo; A Imada; T Yokota
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  [Multi-center evaluation of Showa ceftizoxime disk susceptibility test to discriminate between the strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and those susceptible (MSSA)].

Authors:  I Moriyasu; J Igari; N Yamane; T Oguri; A Takahashi; M Tosaka; K Takemori; S Toyoshima; W Minamide
Journal:  Rinsho Byori       Date:  1994-03

10.  Beta-lactam resistance mechanisms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M Franciolli; J Bille; M P Glauser; P Moreillon
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  58 in total

1.  Detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with commercially available tests.

Authors:  Ane B Poulsen; Robert Skov; Lars Pallesen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Cefoxitin does not induce production of penicillin binding protein 2a in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Authors:  Ana Lúcia da Costa Darini; Izabel Cristina Vanzato Palazzo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of the automated phoenix system for potential routine use in the clinical microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  J-L Donay; D Mathieu; P Fernandes; C Prégermain; P Bruel; A Wargnier; I Casin; F X Weill; P H Lagrange; J L Herrmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Is the cefoxitin disk test reliable enough to detect oxacillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci?

Authors:  Eliete A M Frigatto; Antonia M O Machado; Antônio C C Pignatari; Ana C Gales
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of different methods to detect oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and their clinical laboratory utility.

Authors:  G Boşgelmez-Tinaz; S Ulusoy; B Aridoğan; F Coşkun-Ari
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Evaluation of a new chromogenic medium for isolation and presumptive identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from human clinical specimens.

Authors:  J Loulergue; C de Gialluly; V Morange; A Holstein; N van der Mee-Marquet; R Quentin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Comparison of three chromogenic media and enrichment broth media for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from mucocutaneous screening specimens : Comparison of MRSA chromogenic media.

Authors:  C Nonhoff; O Denis; A Brenner; P Buidin; N Legros; C Thiroux; M Dramaix; M J Struelens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Performance of microcalorimetry for early detection of methicillin resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Daniela Baldoni; Heinz Hermann; Reno Frei; Andrej Trampuz; Andrea Steinhuber
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  A study of the intestinal carriage of antibiotic resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Nigerian children.

Authors:  E O Akinkunmi; A Lamikanra
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.927

10.  Disk Diffusion Testing for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci: Does Moxalactam Improve upon Cefoxitin?

Authors:  Marie Bonjean; Elisabeth Hodille; Oana Dumitrescu; Céline Dupieux; Christina Nkoud Mongo; Camille Allam; Mathilde Beghin; Mickael Paris; Ophelie Borrel; Hubert Chardon; Fréderic Laurent; Jean-Philippe Rasigade; Gerard Lina
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.