Literature DB >> 25627755

Cost-benefit analysis from the hospital perspective of universal active screening followed by contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriers.

James A McKinnell1, Sarah M Bartsch2, Bruce Y Lee2, Susan S Huang3, Loren G Miller1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To explore the economic impact to a hospital of universal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening. METHODS We used a decision tree model to estimate the direct economic impact to an individual hospital of starting universal MRSA screening and contact precautions. Projected costs and benefits were based on literature-derived data. Our model examined outcomes of several strategies including non-nares MRSA screening and comparison of culture versus polymerase chain reaction-based screening. RESULTS Under baseline conditions, the costs of universal MRSA screening and contact precautions outweighed the projected benefits generated by preventing MRSA-related infections, resulting in economic costs of $104,000 per 10,000 admissions (95% CI, $83,000-$126,000). Cost-savings occurred only when the model used estimates at the extremes of our key parameters. Non-nares screening and polymerase chain reaction-based testing, both of which identified more MRSA-colonized persons, resulted in more MRSA infections averted but increased economic costs of the screening program. CONCLUSIONS We found that universal MRSA screening, although providing potential benefit in preventing MRSA infection, is relatively costly and may be economically burdensome for a hospital. Policy makers should consider the economic burden of MRSA screening and contact precautions in relation to other interventions when choosing programs to improve patient safety and outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25627755      PMCID: PMC4500653          DOI: 10.1017/ice.2014.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  37 in total

1.  Look before you leap: active surveillance for multidrug-resistant organisms.

Authors:  Daniel J Diekema; Michael B Edmond
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  To screen or not to screen for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Lance R Peterson; Daniel J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of factors associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization at time of hospital or intensive care unit admission.

Authors:  James A McKinnell; Loren G Miller; Samantha J Eells; Eric Cui; Susan S Huang
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Nosocomial methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus primary bacteremia: at what costs?

Authors:  M A Abramson; D J Sexton
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated from European medical centres: results of the Daptomycin Surveillance Programme (2002-2004).

Authors:  H S Sader; J M Streit; T R Fritsche; R N Jones
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 6.  Quantifying the impact of extranasal testing of body sites for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization at the time of hospital or intensive care unit admission.

Authors:  James A McKinnell; Susan S Huang; Samantha J Eells; Eric Cui; Loren G Miller
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Active screening in high-risk units is an effective and cost-avoidant method to reduce the rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in the hospital.

Authors:  Megan Clancy; Amy Graepler; Michael Wilson; Ivor Douglas; Jeff Johnson; Connie Savor Price
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  Adverse clinical and economic outcomes attributable to methicillin resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection.

Authors:  John J Engemann; Yehuda Carmeli; Sara E Cosgrove; Vance G Fowler; Melissa Z Bronstein; Sharon L Trivette; Jane P Briggs; Daniel J Sexton; Keith S Kaye
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  The economic impact of Staphylococcus aureus infection in New York City hospitals.

Authors:  R J Rubin; C A Harrington; A Poon; K Dietrich; J A Greene; A Moiduddin
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Cost comparison of MRSA screening and management - a decision tree analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Tübbicke; Claudia Hübner; Nils-Olaf Hübner; Christian Wegner; Axel Kramer; Steffen Fleßa
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  6 in total

1.  Economic Analysis of Veterans Affairs Initiative to Prevent Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections.

Authors:  Richard E Nelson; Vanessa W Stevens; Karim Khader; Makoto Jones; Matthew H Samore; Martin E Evans; R Douglas Scott; Rachel B Slayton; Marin L Schweizer; Eli L Perencevich; Michael A Rubin
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Reply to O'Riordan et al.

Authors:  James A McKinnell; Sarah M Bartsch; Bruce Y Lee; Susan S Huang; Loren G Miller
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.254

3.  Discontinuation of contact precautions with the introduction of universal daily chlorhexidine bathing.

Authors:  J A McKinnell; S J Eells; E Clark; D D Rand; G T Kiet; R Macias-Gil; J M Mendez; S S Huang; E N Milefchik; L G Miller
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 2.451

4.  Evaluation of Patients' Adverse Events During Contact Isolation for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Using a Matched Cohort Study With Propensity Score.

Authors:  JaHyun Kang; Eunjeong Ji; Junghee Kim; Hyunok Bae; Eunyoung Cho; Eu Suk Kim; Myoung Jin Shin; Hong Bin Kim
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-03-01

5.  Cost Analysis of Universal Screening vs. Risk Factor-Based Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Authors:  Virginia R Roth; Tara Longpre; Doug Coyle; Kathryn N Suh; Monica Taljaard; Katherine A Muldoon; Karamchand Ramotar; Alan Forster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Isolation Precautions in the Inpatient Setting.

Authors:  Emily W Gottenborg; Michelle A Barron
Journal:  Hosp Med Clin       Date:  2015-11-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.