Literature DB >> 20160979

Will knowledge of gene-based colorectal cancer disease risk influence quality of life and screening behavior? Findings from a population-based study.

Scott Ramsey1, David Blough, Cara McDermott, Lauren Clarke, Robin Bennett, Wylie Burke, Polly Newcomb.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several gene variants conveying a modestly increased risk for disease have been described for colorectal cancer. Patient acceptance of gene variant testing in clinical practice is not known. We evaluated the potential impact of hypothetical colorectal-cancer-associated gene variant testing on quality of life, health habits and cancer screening behavior.
METHODS: First-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients and controls from the Seattle Colorectal Cancer Familial Registry were invited to participate in a web-based survey regarding testing for gene variants associated with colorectal cancer risk.
RESULTS: 310 relatives and 170 controls completed the questionnaire. Quality of life for the hypothetical carrier state was modestly and nonsignificantly lower than current health after adjustment for sociodemographic and health factors. In the positive test scenario, 30% of respondents expressed willingness to change their diet, 25% to increase exercise, and 43% to start colorectal cancer screening. The proportions willing to modify these habits did not differ between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Testing for gene variants associated with colorectal cancer risk may not influence quality of life, but may impact health habits and screening adherence. Changing behaviors as a result of testing may help to reduce cancer incidence and mortality, particularly among those at higher risk for colorectal cancer.
Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Gene variant testing; Polymorphism; Quality of life; Screening behavior

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20160979      PMCID: PMC2760996          DOI: 10.1159/000206346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  49 in total

1.  Shattuck lecture--medical and societal consequences of the Human Genome Project.

Authors:  F S Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal.

Authors:  G W Torrance
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Predictive testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: motivation, illness representations and short-term psychological impact.

Authors:  Erna Claes; Lieve Denayer; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Andrea Boogaerts; Eric Legius
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-11

Review 4.  The new genetics. Psychological responses to genetic testing.

Authors:  T M Marteau; R T Croyle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-28

5.  Psychological impact of genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ellen R Gritz; Susan K Peterson; Sally W Vernon; Salma K Marani; Walter F Baile; Beatty G Watts; Christopher I Amos; Marsha L Frazier; Patrick M Lynch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Health care provider-directed intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among veterans: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Rosario Ferreira; Nancy C Dolan; Marian L Fitzgibbon; Terry C Davis; Nicolle Gorby; Lisa Ladewski; Dachao Liu; Alfred W Rademaker; Franklin Medio; Brian P Schmitt; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Relationship between metabolic enzyme polymorphism and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kun Chen; Qin-Ting Jiang; Han-Qing He
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Psychological distress in women seeking genetic counseling for breast-ovarian cancer risk: the contributions of personality and appraisal.

Authors:  J Audrain; M D Schwartz; C Lerman; C Hughes; B N Peshkin; B Biesecker
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1997

9.  Cancer risk assessment: quality and impact of the family history interview.

Authors:  Harvey J Murff; Daniel Byrne; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 10.  Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States.

Authors:  Hind A Beydoun; May A Beydoun
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 2.506

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Genetic architecture of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ulrike Peters; Stephanie Bien; Niha Zubair
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Laypersons' views of material incentives for enhancing colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Lea Hagoel; Gad Rennert; Paula Feder-Bubis
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  Population sciences, translational research, and the opportunities and challenges for genomics to reduce the burden of cancer in the 21st century.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Steven B Clauser; Andrew N Freedman; Elizabeth M Gillanders; Russ E Glasgow; William M P Klein; Sheri D Schully
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Interest in genetic testing for modest changes in breast cancer risk: implications for SNP testing.

Authors:  K D Graves; B N Peshkin; G Luta; W Tuong; M D Schwartz
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Interest and informational preferences regarding genomic testing for modest increases in colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  A E Anderson; K G Flores; W Boonyasiriwat; A Gammon; W Kohlmann; W C Birmingham; M D Schwartz; J Samadder; K Boucher; A Y Kinney
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 6.  100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  When is Genomic Testing Cost-Effective? Testing for Lynch Syndrome in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Colorectal Cancer and Their Relatives.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-24

8.  Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients up to 70 years of age.

Authors:  Celine H M Leenen; Anne Goverde; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Anja Wagner; Margot G F van Lier; Manon C W Spaander; Marco J Bruno; Carli M Tops; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Hendrikus J Dubbink; Ernst J Kuipers; Winand N M Dinjens; Monique E van Leerdam; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Predictors of patient uptake of colorectal cancer gene environment risk assessment.

Authors:  Michael J Hall; Sharon L Manne; Ronald E Myers; Eileen M Keenan; Andrew M Balshem; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  Determining Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Starting Age of Screening Based on Lifestyle, Environmental, and Genetic Factors.

Authors:  Jihyoun Jeon; Mengmeng Du; Robert E Schoen; Michael Hoffmeister; Polly A Newcomb; Sonja I Berndt; Bette Caan; Peter T Campbell; Andrew T Chan; Jenny Chang-Claude; Graham G Giles; Jian Gong; Tabitha A Harrison; Jeroen R Huyghe; Eric J Jacobs; Li Li; Yi Lin; Loïc Le Marchand; John D Potter; Conghui Qu; Stephanie A Bien; Niha Zubair; Robert J Macinnis; Daniel D Buchanan; John L Hopper; Yin Cao; Reiko Nishihara; Gad Rennert; Martha L Slattery; Duncan C Thomas; Michael O Woods; Ross L Prentice; Stephen B Gruber; Yingye Zheng; Hermann Brenner; Richard B Hayes; Emily White; Ulrike Peters; Li Hsu
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 33.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.