BACKGROUND: Several gene variants conveying a modestly increased risk for disease have been described for colorectal cancer. Patient acceptance of gene variant testing in clinical practice is not known. We evaluated the potential impact of hypothetical colorectal-cancer-associated gene variant testing on quality of life, health habits and cancer screening behavior. METHODS: First-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients and controls from the Seattle Colorectal Cancer Familial Registry were invited to participate in a web-based survey regarding testing for gene variants associated with colorectal cancer risk. RESULTS: 310 relatives and 170 controls completed the questionnaire. Quality of life for the hypothetical carrier state was modestly and nonsignificantly lower than current health after adjustment for sociodemographic and health factors. In the positive test scenario, 30% of respondents expressed willingness to change their diet, 25% to increase exercise, and 43% to start colorectal cancer screening. The proportions willing to modify these habits did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Testing for gene variants associated with colorectal cancer risk may not influence quality of life, but may impact health habits and screening adherence. Changing behaviors as a result of testing may help to reduce cancer incidence and mortality, particularly among those at higher risk for colorectal cancer.
BACKGROUND: Several gene variants conveying a modestly increased risk for disease have been described for colorectal cancer. Patient acceptance of gene variant testing in clinical practice is not known. We evaluated the potential impact of hypothetical colorectal-cancer-associated gene variant testing on quality of life, health habits and cancer screening behavior. METHODS: First-degree relatives of colorectal cancerpatients and controls from the Seattle Colorectal Cancer Familial Registry were invited to participate in a web-based survey regarding testing for gene variants associated with colorectal cancer risk. RESULTS: 310 relatives and 170 controls completed the questionnaire. Quality of life for the hypothetical carrier state was modestly and nonsignificantly lower than current health after adjustment for sociodemographic and health factors. In the positive test scenario, 30% of respondents expressed willingness to change their diet, 25% to increase exercise, and 43% to start colorectal cancer screening. The proportions willing to modify these habits did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Testing for gene variants associated with colorectal cancer risk may not influence quality of life, but may impact health habits and screening adherence. Changing behaviors as a result of testing may help to reduce cancer incidence and mortality, particularly among those at higher risk for colorectal cancer.
Authors: Ellen R Gritz; Susan K Peterson; Sally W Vernon; Salma K Marani; Walter F Baile; Beatty G Watts; Christopher I Amos; Marsha L Frazier; Patrick M Lynch Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-03-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Rosario Ferreira; Nancy C Dolan; Marian L Fitzgibbon; Terry C Davis; Nicolle Gorby; Lisa Ladewski; Dachao Liu; Alfred W Rademaker; Franklin Medio; Brian P Schmitt; Charles L Bennett Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Muin J Khoury; Steven B Clauser; Andrew N Freedman; Elizabeth M Gillanders; Russ E Glasgow; William M P Klein; Sheri D Schully Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: A E Anderson; K G Flores; W Boonyasiriwat; A Gammon; W Kohlmann; W C Birmingham; M D Schwartz; J Samadder; K Boucher; A Y Kinney Journal: Public Health Genomics Date: 2014-01-14 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Celine H M Leenen; Anne Goverde; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Anja Wagner; Margot G F van Lier; Manon C W Spaander; Marco J Bruno; Carli M Tops; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Hendrikus J Dubbink; Ernst J Kuipers; Winand N M Dinjens; Monique E van Leerdam; Ewout W Steyerberg Journal: Genet Med Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Michael J Hall; Sharon L Manne; Ronald E Myers; Eileen M Keenan; Andrew M Balshem; David S Weinberg Journal: Genome Med Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 11.117
Authors: Jihyoun Jeon; Mengmeng Du; Robert E Schoen; Michael Hoffmeister; Polly A Newcomb; Sonja I Berndt; Bette Caan; Peter T Campbell; Andrew T Chan; Jenny Chang-Claude; Graham G Giles; Jian Gong; Tabitha A Harrison; Jeroen R Huyghe; Eric J Jacobs; Li Li; Yi Lin; Loïc Le Marchand; John D Potter; Conghui Qu; Stephanie A Bien; Niha Zubair; Robert J Macinnis; Daniel D Buchanan; John L Hopper; Yin Cao; Reiko Nishihara; Gad Rennert; Martha L Slattery; Duncan C Thomas; Michael O Woods; Ross L Prentice; Stephen B Gruber; Yingye Zheng; Hermann Brenner; Richard B Hayes; Emily White; Ulrike Peters; Li Hsu Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2018-02-17 Impact factor: 33.883